Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

Dawes Devices AFR meter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27 March 2002, 02:21 AM
  #1  
jfwilfley
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
jfwilfley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Hello from Colorado. Darren Dawes suggested I ask here if anyone has experience hooking up his afr meter to the subaru o2 sensor that reads in the 0-,9v range. On the '02 WRX US model the speculation is that the o2 sensor may be too far aft in the system to be accurate and that reading to only .9v may not be enough. Any expreience here would be much appreciated by us both. Thank you, jfwilfley@aol.com
Old 27 March 2002, 08:26 AM
  #2  
mutant_matt
Scooby Regular
 
mutant_matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: London
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

I'm not sure if I understood your post but hopefully this *may* help:

1. The Lambda (o2) sensor in the mid section is not used for fueling - it's there to detect if the cats are working.

2. The Lambda sensor in the Downpipe is the one used for fueling and AFAIK, is the same as the <MY01. The useful output range for this sensor is 0.7 - 0.9v. I think that the Dawes AFR meter reads this range so all you should have to do is connect it to the Front Lambda wire feed (at the ECU is my prefered point) and that's pretty much it.

(this is all based on the MY01 Lambda output being the same as the MY00)

Matt
Old 27 March 2002, 08:38 AM
  #3  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

The MY01 front sensor is wideband and incompatible with the Dawes meter. The I-club guys find the read sensor works reasonably well with a short delay in the results. Look for 830mV, 850mV and 870mV at 5-10, 10-15, and 15+ PSI respectively over 3000RPM. It also gets richer up the rev range. Most cars are about 20mV higher (richer) than this.
Old 27 March 2002, 01:36 PM
  #4  
jfwilfley
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
 
jfwilfley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thanks for the input on this. I'll go ahead and try the rear sensor and see what I get. Since I don't have any radical modifications, I'm sure I'll be ok. jfw
Old 27 March 2002, 02:30 PM
  #5  
mutant_matt
Scooby Regular
 
mutant_matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: London
Posts: 7,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Thing is though John, looking at the STi 7 trace from the EcuTek site, from 3000rpm up, that car (with PE exhaust) is running 0.95v which has gotta be too rich. It seems to me that the rear sensor is similar but not the same to the MY00 front sensor? (on my run with just a PPP BB (so still really rich), the most I got was 0.91v.

What do you think?

Matt
Old 27 March 2002, 02:50 PM
  #6  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Yes it seems the rear sensor on Bugeyes is similar/same to the Classic's only sensor.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimBowen
ICE
5
02 July 2023 01:54 PM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
XRS
Computer & Technology Related
18
16 October 2015 01:38 PM
Nick_Cat
Computer & Technology Related
2
26 September 2015 08:00 AM
Townsend94
ScoobyNet General
4
23 September 2015 07:21 AM



Quick Reply: Dawes Devices AFR meter



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:56 AM.