100mph is 4th at 7krpm on a 95wrx is this right?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Middlesbrough
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
100mph is 4th at 7krpm on a 95wrx is this right?
Ok after a long running problem on my 95 wrx ive finally traced it to the speedo converter (I Think) when I have it on the speedo is wrong and without it its still loads wrong. I know the speed is correct as I have a road angel gps with speedo readout. The car does 100mph in forth at 7krpm is this right? I know they are low geared but previous cars ive had would do 100mph in third (VR6 Golf, Nissan 200sx) could the car have a different gearbox which would explain why the speedo is so far out, without the converter the speedo reads 210kmh at 100mph, the speedo clocks havent had a cover put on them to convert to mph just a sticker to cover the kmh. The car speedo only goes to 240kmh and 100mph is 210kmh, it reads just over double when the converter should be 1:6.
My only guess is its got a different gear box
any ideas?
cheers simon
My only guess is its got a different gear box
any ideas?
cheers simon
#2
Originally Posted by 200sxsimon
Ok after a long running problem on my 95 wrx ive finally traced it to the speedo converter (I Think) when I have it on the speedo is wrong and without it its still loads wrong. I know the speed is correct as I have a road angel gps with speedo readout. The car does 100mph in forth at 7krpm is this right? I know they are low geared but previous cars ive had would do 100mph in third (VR6 Golf, Nissan 200sx) could the car have a different gearbox which would explain why the speedo is so far out, without the converter the speedo reads 210kmh at 100mph, the speedo clocks havent had a cover put on them to convert to mph just a sticker to cover the kmh. The car speedo only goes to 240kmh and 100mph is 210kmh, it reads just over double when the converter should be 1:6.
My only guess is its got a different gear box
any ideas?
cheers simon
My only guess is its got a different gear box
any ideas?
cheers simon
#4
Originally Posted by 200sxsimon
cheers for the reply red suns. Ok now just gotta figure out why the speedo is so far out.
cheers simon
cheers simon
if its a ver1 its a cable type speedo, ver2 are different.... hope this helps
#5
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Middlesbrough
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok how do I know if its ver 1 or 2 its a cable driven speedo, the clocks I have say sti at the bottom under the trip and go up to 240kmh but even in kmh the speedo is nearly double the actual speed could i have the wrong ver for the cable and gearbox?
cheers simon
cheers simon
Originally Posted by Red Suns
is it a Version 1 or 2?
if its a ver1 its a cable type speedo, ver2 are different.... hope this helps
if its a ver1 its a cable type speedo, ver2 are different.... hope this helps
#7
100mph = 160kph divide mph by 5 then multiply by 8
just a thought. If you have a geared converter, is it possible to fit ar$e about face so instead of reducing the cable speed, to the head, it's increasing it?
i.e. at 100 mph on gps, g/box would run the std cable set up for 160kph. Converter ratio (if fitted wrong) would increase this to read 256 kph.
Standard clock, on mine before conversion and MPH sticker reads to 180kph which is 112.5 mph which is the limiter setting on imports.
Hope all that makes sense and not cr@p
just a thought. If you have a geared converter, is it possible to fit ar$e about face so instead of reducing the cable speed, to the head, it's increasing it?
i.e. at 100 mph on gps, g/box would run the std cable set up for 160kph. Converter ratio (if fitted wrong) would increase this to read 256 kph.
Standard clock, on mine before conversion and MPH sticker reads to 180kph which is 112.5 mph which is the limiter setting on imports.
Hope all that makes sense and not cr@p
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
matt12
ScoobyNet General
59
08 November 2015 09:15 PM
Ravimal3
General Technical
9
22 September 2015 06:44 AM
KevMac
ScoobyNet General
7
10 February 2001 11:13 PM