Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

Bug / Blob STi mechanical power reserves

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09 September 2004, 02:48 PM
  #1  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Bug / Blob STi mechanical power reserves

Anybody comment on:

Above cars with 6 spd will withstand 400lb ft as an everyday drive for a reasonable mileage (say 50k mls +)

That is to say no internal mods - just, turbo, IC and ECU

Suggestions for lowest cost safe upgrade for 03 Blob STi for over 350lb ft - no additional lag
Old 09 September 2004, 03:24 PM
  #2  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

IMHO, the earlier STis with forged pistons are strong, but the pistons may pick up in the bores when hot at serious power and torque levels. The later STis with hypereutectic pistons are reasonably strong, but may be less likely to pick up. I reckon the 6 speed is good for 400 lbft but I've only done 1/4 of your 50k mileage so far at this level.

If you want no additional lag then you either keep the original turbo, or you upgrade to twin scroll, or increase the capacity. IC is quite good already, ECU remapped will support a lot of power and torque.

400 lbft will require a lot of boost on a 2.0, don't think anyone has done it at 350-400 lbft on standard internals for a long time.

I reckon your best chance for reliability is to run a 2.5 with something like a 20G and run it at 350 lbft IMHO, but it is all opinion as no one has done it for 50k mls+.

Other opinions will differ, but for torque at low boost the EJ257 is obviously king of the standard engines, but is not standard on models you are looking at (yet), may never be.

If you want to hold that torque to the top - ie make serious power, you'll need to upgrade the injectors probably.

You might be best starting with exhaust, fuel pump and remap and see how you feel about it then?
Old 09 September 2004, 03:34 PM
  #3  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
IMHO, the earlier STis with forged pistons are strong, but the pistons may pick up in the bores when hot at serious power and torque levels. The later STis with hypereutectic pistons are reasonably strong, but may be less likely to pick up. I reckon the 6 speed is good for 400 lbft but I've only done 1/4 of your 50k mileage so far at this level.

If you want no additional lag then you either keep the original turbo, or you upgrade to twin scroll, or increase the capacity. IC is quite good already, ECU remapped will support a lot of power and torque.

400 lbft will require a lot of boost on a 2.0, don't think anyone has done it at 350-400 lbft on standard internals for a long time.

I reckon your best chance for reliability is to run a 2.5 with something like a 20G and run it at 350 lbft IMHO, but it is all opinion as no one has done it for 50k mls+.

Other opinions will differ, but for torque at low boost the EJ257 is obviously king of the standard engines, but is not standard on models you are looking at (yet), may never be.

If you want to hold that torque to the top - ie make serious power, you'll need to upgrade the injectors probably.

You might be best starting with exhaust, fuel pump and remap and see how you feel about it then?
What mods are u running to get 400? (thanks for detailed answer above by the way)

How far do u think we can go just with pump, exhaust and re-map with 30k + mls expectancy - TSL claim 333 - customers say cant feel difference between T333 and PPP - however cant help thinking a real 350 lb ft has to be felt?! - If practical on 2 litre why did Ian feel need to go to expense of 2.5?
Old 09 September 2004, 03:59 PM
  #4  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

2.5 - very little lag, less octane hungry.

The turbo will determine the top end power above all else.

333 is about as far as you can go, really depends on the rollers, some 333s show less than 300 on some rollers for example.
Old 09 September 2004, 04:05 PM
  #5  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
2.5 - very little lag, less octane hungry.

The turbo will determine the top end power above all else.

333 is about as far as you can go, really depends on the rollers, some 333s show less than 300 on some rollers for example.
a 333 with PPP power - brilliant!

The 2.5 makes sense right up to the point you find out you have to take your nice new engine out and throw it away and keep the heads if you are lucky!!!

Why on earth isnt IM / Prodrive ordering some US 2.5 spec engined Euro cars and doing a proper Prodrive upgrade - sure it could be done for under £30k - where it needs to be..
Old 09 September 2004, 04:15 PM
  #6  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Because for 262 to 300 BHP the 2.0 is ideal for a factory car, it revs high, is reliable and matches the gearbox.

You'll need serious boost to get 400 lbft out of a 2.0, and I'm not sure the stock piston clearances are up to it. A 2.5 feels unstressed kicking out this torque. The best 2.0s rev a lot nicer though up top. There are so many potential candidates for strong motors, but they all share rather small bearings so high mileage and silly torque are unlikely to go together.

Last edited by john banks; 09 September 2004 at 04:17 PM.
Old 09 September 2004, 10:03 PM
  #7  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by john banks
Because for 262 to 300 BHP the 2.0 is ideal for a factory car, it revs high, is reliable and matches the gearbox.

You'll need serious boost to get 400 lbft out of a 2.0, and I'm not sure the stock piston clearances are up to it. A 2.5 feels unstressed kicking out this torque. The best 2.0s rev a lot nicer though up top. There are so many potential candidates for strong motors, but they all share rather small bearings so high mileage and silly torque are unlikely to go together.
so your 'recipe to fit the bill, Jim?'
Old 09 September 2004, 11:08 PM
  #8  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

For 350 lbft on a new age STi get a JDM twin scroll STI and modify it as per Bob Rawle's thread, IIRC:

Fuel pump
ECU remap
Exhaust
Intake
Actuator
3 port solenoid
A dash of NF octane booster as you might run on an STi import anyway - say 2ml/litre.

If you can't get a twin scroll car you could consider retrofitting the twin scroll stuff, or you could go the 2.5 route with a single scroll turbo:

EJ257 block, headgaskets
TD05-16G for 350 lbft or TD05-20G for 400 lbft
Fuel pump
ECU remap
Exhaust
Intake
3 port solenoid
Old 10 September 2004, 11:16 AM
  #9  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
For 350 lbft on a new age STi get a JDM twin scroll STI and modify it as per Bob Rawle's thread, IIRC:

Fuel pump
ECU remap
Exhaust
Intake
Actuator
3 port solenoid
A dash of NF octane booster as you might run on an STi import anyway - say 2ml/litre.

If you can't get a twin scroll car you could consider retrofitting the twin scroll stuff, or you could go the 2.5 route with a single scroll turbo:

EJ257 block, headgaskets
TD05-16G for 350 lbft or TD05-20G for 400 lbft
Fuel pump
ECU remap
Exhaust
Intake
3 port solenoid
thanks for helpful reply - will try and findBobs thread - what is IIRC?
Old 10 September 2004, 12:44 PM
  #10  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

if I recall correctly
Old 10 September 2004, 01:00 PM
  #11  
GRIFF007
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GRIFF007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by john banks
if I recall correctly

ah so!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ATWRX
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
88
01 February 2016 07:28 PM
Reshard1977
Wanted
2
17 September 2015 11:02 AM
Reshard1977
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
3
14 September 2015 01:54 PM
Dan-
Drivetrain
0
14 September 2015 10:13 AM
GONZO01
ScoobyNet General
12
14 September 2015 09:12 AM



Quick Reply: Bug / Blob STi mechanical power reserves



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:23 AM.