Engine Warning Light Help???
#1
Whilst at Japfest yesterday I fitted an ITG air filter to my STI7 After about 10 minutes into the journey home an orange engine light came on above the temp guage any idea why this might happen???
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Scoobysport, Basildon, UK
Posts: 4,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Or it could be telling you that there is a problem that may or may not be related to the fitting of the filter.
I see you are in Essex. Not sure who you bought the filter from but we have all of the Subaru diagnostic equipment and there is no charge to tell you what has gone wrong.
I see you are in Essex. Not sure who you bought the filter from but we have all of the Subaru diagnostic equipment and there is no charge to tell you what has gone wrong.
#6
Twatful
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Grew up and don't drive Scoobs anymore!
Posts: 9,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have you tried a fault check?
Simply connect the 2 black connectors(jumper 5) under the dash and count the flashes. Do a search for the full instructions and fault codes.
http://www.saxonfields.freeserve.co.uk/Scooby%20Page/ECU%20Diag%20Page.htm
Simply connect the 2 black connectors(jumper 5) under the dash and count the flashes. Do a search for the full instructions and fault codes.
http://www.saxonfields.freeserve.co.uk/Scooby%20Page/ECU%20Diag%20Page.htm
#7
Scooby Regular
Nick1
You are wrong mate
Pete will proably defend the ITG as I know he has sold loads of these and has had few complaints back... so fair play to Pete
However, I am on MAF no 4 in 2 years and most people feel that when fitted 100% correctly the infamous green gunk cannot get through the filter to the MAF side of things... but even after ensuring perfect fitting the gunk has permeated the other side of the filter and undoubtedly will get sucked into the MAF
This is obviously only MY opinion and the MAFs are well know for failing even under standard paper filtration BUT from experience (4 MAFs and 1 new engine later ) I would stay well away from anything oil based when dealing with an MY99 car.
Cheers
You are wrong mate
Pete will proably defend the ITG as I know he has sold loads of these and has had few complaints back... so fair play to Pete
However, I am on MAF no 4 in 2 years and most people feel that when fitted 100% correctly the infamous green gunk cannot get through the filter to the MAF side of things... but even after ensuring perfect fitting the gunk has permeated the other side of the filter and undoubtedly will get sucked into the MAF
This is obviously only MY opinion and the MAFs are well know for failing even under standard paper filtration BUT from experience (4 MAFs and 1 new engine later ) I would stay well away from anything oil based when dealing with an MY99 car.
Cheers
Trending Topics
#8
SiPie, I am now confused. The ITG filter I fitted is not an foam filter you soak in oil. It's just a replacement sponge filter.
I beleive if you change these after about 30,000 miles you should be fine
I beleive if you change these after about 30,000 miles you should be fine
#9
Scooby Regular
ITG Panel filter is oil based.
You touch it and you get green gunk on your hands
Unless ITG make a dry filter
I had the ITG Panel filter from Sccobyworld that cost around £40 if that's the one.........
You touch it and you get green gunk on your hands
Unless ITG make a dry filter
I had the ITG Panel filter from Sccobyworld that cost around £40 if that's the one.........
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Solihull
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nick
The chain of events could go as follows
New filter allows contamination of the airflow meter which then misses some of the air passing the sensor which means the engine gradually runs leaner. Short term this may mean it's faster, immediately before it blows up at your expense...
If we could find a filter that we were happy about we would be selling it. Our best suggestion is keep changing the std paper filter at shorter intervals than recommended if you think it's going to cause any restriction with increasing mileage.
Mike
The chain of events could go as follows
New filter allows contamination of the airflow meter which then misses some of the air passing the sensor which means the engine gradually runs leaner. Short term this may mean it's faster, immediately before it blows up at your expense...
If we could find a filter that we were happy about we would be selling it. Our best suggestion is keep changing the std paper filter at shorter intervals than recommended if you think it's going to cause any restriction with increasing mileage.
Mike
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Scoobysport, Basildon, UK
Posts: 4,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since the re-design of the MAF from the notoriously weak 99/00 version, I am not aware of one single MAF failure on a new age car (Nick has a 2001/2 STi).
If someone has had a failure, PLEASE post up here and let us have the details and tell us what filter it was with.
This doesn't surprise me as the new age MAF sensor is much better designed and the 90deg bends that the air must go through will have any contaminants centrifuged out of the sample air before it gets to the sensor wire.
As SiPie said above, 99/00 MAFs will fail with whatever filter you use and are getting a reputation as being consumables on these cars.
If someone has had a failure, PLEASE post up here and let us have the details and tell us what filter it was with.
This doesn't surprise me as the new age MAF sensor is much better designed and the 90deg bends that the air must go through will have any contaminants centrifuged out of the sample air before it gets to the sensor wire.
As SiPie said above, 99/00 MAFs will fail with whatever filter you use and are getting a reputation as being consumables on these cars.
#16
Scooby Regular
If someone has had a failure, PLEASE post up here and let us have the details and tell us what filter it was with.
March 2002
ITG Panel Filter
Failure resulting in rough running and hunting idle
--------------------
July 2002
ITG Panel Filter
Failure resulting in rough running and hunting idle
--------------------
November 2002
Standard paper filtration
Failure resulting in rough running and hunting idle.
However cause could also have been attributed to failed O2 sensor at same time [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]
--------------------
January 2003
ITG Panel Filter
Failure resulting in under fuelling and a big sort of bang and a big sort of VISA bill for £3,567.85
However the above is a bit of a grey area as 2 HT leads were worn and dealer identified cause of piston melt as unburnt fuel building in cyclinder 2 then finally HT lead did it's stuff helping create a spark and BOOM and MAF changed as precaution (along with fuel pump, oil pump etc etc)
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Scoobysport, Basildon, UK
Posts: 4,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sipie
I thought you had a 99/00 and I agree just how fragile the sensor is in these.
Nick has a Sti7 and from Mike's post he has also never heard of one of the new age MAFs failing. Its a shame you can't retro fit these.
I thought you had a 99/00 and I agree just how fragile the sensor is in these.
Nick has a Sti7 and from Mike's post he has also never heard of one of the new age MAFs failing. Its a shame you can't retro fit these.
#18
Scooby Regular
Yeah...
Don't worry Pete. It is a MY99 that I have and isn't hindsight a wonderful thing
And as you mentioned, I'm going to treat the MAF as a consumable and change it annually (If I keep the car that long anyway!!!)
Cheers Pete
[Edited by SiPie - 5/19/2003 5:03:47 PM]
Don't worry Pete. It is a MY99 that I have and isn't hindsight a wonderful thing
And as you mentioned, I'm going to treat the MAF as a consumable and change it annually (If I keep the car that long anyway!!!)
Cheers Pete
[Edited by SiPie - 5/19/2003 5:03:47 PM]
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Scoobysport, Basildon, UK
Posts: 4,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL at Mike
For a tiny moment there I thought we had a straight answer from you
Nick
If you pop by, I will put your car on the Select Monitor and let you know why the light came on.
For a tiny moment there I thought we had a straight answer from you
Nick
If you pop by, I will put your car on the Select Monitor and let you know why the light came on.
#21
Hi Pete thanks for the offer and your comments here I am not over your way for a couple of weeks as I live near Braintree/Witham. I am off to Cornwall on Friday and a little worried so I may have to pop into XS to see if they can read it for me as they are just around the corner.
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2000
Location: MY00,MY01,RX-8, Alfa 147 & Focus ST :-)
Posts: 10,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I'll pitch in here too. Over 30000 miles using ITG filters - absolutely no problems.
Chris (MY01 WRX)
Just to balance things up, on my old car (UK MY00), over 42000 miles, I used K&N, ITG, a standard paper filter and an HKS 'mushroom' with and without a resonator (mainly I think because I was curious) - never had a problem with any of these either. Could it be something to do with the quality of the fitting in the first place?
Chris
[Edited by Chris L - 5/19/2003 11:16:34 PM]
Chris (MY01 WRX)
Just to balance things up, on my old car (UK MY00), over 42000 miles, I used K&N, ITG, a standard paper filter and an HKS 'mushroom' with and without a resonator (mainly I think because I was curious) - never had a problem with any of these either. Could it be something to do with the quality of the fitting in the first place?
Chris
[Edited by Chris L - 5/19/2003 11:16:34 PM]
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Solihull
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chaps
Let me just clarify something.
NO filter other than the std paper filter meets Subaru filtration standards for the later cars and therefore fitment of such would potentially put the car outside warranty. It doesn't matter whether your Subaru dealer supplies it, it still doesn't meet the standards and is therefore not covered.
If you dealer is 'turning a blind eye' with any potential warranty claim (however unlikely) he too is defrauding Subaru UK. The same applies to decat exhausts as well as other engine mods like dumpvalves and ECU remaps.
Regards
Mike
Let me just clarify something.
NO filter other than the std paper filter meets Subaru filtration standards for the later cars and therefore fitment of such would potentially put the car outside warranty. It doesn't matter whether your Subaru dealer supplies it, it still doesn't meet the standards and is therefore not covered.
If you dealer is 'turning a blind eye' with any potential warranty claim (however unlikely) he too is defrauding Subaru UK. The same applies to decat exhausts as well as other engine mods like dumpvalves and ECU remaps.
Regards
Mike
#28
I have the same orange light on my STI8 after a few days. Its something to do with the Cat's etc on my car. The car runs with a one Cat system whereas when it was made it had two. Basically it means the car isnt happy with the emmisions so BING the light comes on. My dealer is purchasing a new unit from Scooby sport which makes this go away. I aint technical sorry but thats the best i can explain it
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MightyArsenal
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
6
25 September 2015 08:31 PM