3" Exhaust STI 8 Dyno results
#1
We have the dyno graphs up on our web site of a recent trip to the dyno with an STI 8 with a 3" exhaust (no cats) and a stock STI 8.
110kw vs 70kw @ 3700Rpm
145Kw @ 6000Rpm vs 132Kw @ 5800Rpm
Only mod was the exhaust, no boost controller or such like YET.
Check them out on www.subaruclub.co.za under events, Dyno days, All results, sort by model under MY03 STI 8. Also interesting what happened on the STI after 3800, seems to have spiked and then pulled back, any comments on what could be causing this?
110kw vs 70kw @ 3700Rpm
145Kw @ 6000Rpm vs 132Kw @ 5800Rpm
Only mod was the exhaust, no boost controller or such like YET.
Check them out on www.subaruclub.co.za under events, Dyno days, All results, sort by model under MY03 STI 8. Also interesting what happened on the STI after 3800, seems to have spiked and then pulled back, any comments on what could be causing this?
#2
Is this the point at which the AVCS kicks in? It certainly looks odd, and is presumably fueling/timing/boost/airflow related.
For ease of use, here are links straight to the graphs:
Standard
3" exhaust
Duncan
For ease of use, here are links straight to the graphs:
Standard
3" exhaust
Duncan
#3
A Company in Australia called APS fitted a Turbo back 3" exhaust on a stock STI03 ( no ECU upgrade ) and found that the booost spiked up to 23psi at certain rpms which is very risky
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMHO, that looks just like boost spiking. I believe it's caused primarily by the wastegate duty cycle being mapped to overcome the restriction caused by the exhaust (step forward JB or others to tell me I'm spouting rubbish!). Remove the restriction, and the boost overshoots. An analogy is pushing a wardrobe hard - if the wardrobe is suddenly disappears, you'll shoot forward and fall over.
Common on STi7s with decat exhausts on - the standard fix was to increase the restrictor size to about 1.2 or 1.25mm in order to slow the spool up a bit. Other option is a proper remap which alters the wastegate duty cycle.
Common on STi7s with decat exhausts on - the standard fix was to increase the restrictor size to about 1.2 or 1.25mm in order to slow the spool up a bit. Other option is a proper remap which alters the wastegate duty cycle.
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Sorry was in France. From the 3" graph it is obviously overboosting and probably detting with it with that sort of spike. Lots of previous threads on this for the searching.
Also look out for boost creep. Very dodgy because no active knock control in the area where boost creep occurs, very high EGBP, high charge temp, risk of turbo overspeed, pollution of the fresh charge with exhaust gases, detonation. Pretty bad news.
Also look out for boost creep. Very dodgy because no active knock control in the area where boost creep occurs, very high EGBP, high charge temp, risk of turbo overspeed, pollution of the fresh charge with exhaust gases, detonation. Pretty bad news.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: STi8 G spec (400+hp)
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I experienced boost spiking around 24psi during first test of a 2.5' single cat plus Blitz 3' center and BB on my STi03...
A 1.1mm restrictor (instead of 0.9mm) solved the overboosting issue with a maximum 1.25b in 6th gear now, without any noticeable slowing during spool up.
Did any remaper (such as JB) compared std STi7 and STi8 WG solenoid duty tables ? I've got the feeling they are slightly different.
A 1.1mm restrictor (instead of 0.9mm) solved the overboosting issue with a maximum 1.25b in 6th gear now, without any noticeable slowing during spool up.
Did any remaper (such as JB) compared std STi7 and STi8 WG solenoid duty tables ? I've got the feeling they are slightly different.
Trending Topics
#9
Thanks for all the advice guys, to get this care back to a relatively "safe" state what would you suggest?
Would changing the restrictor be sufficient or should we be looking at either a remap or a boost controller of some sorts?
Regards
JohnB
Would changing the restrictor be sufficient or should we be looking at either a remap or a boost controller of some sorts?
Regards
JohnB
#10
A proper remap is the best thing you could do. If you don´t want to spend the money you could change the restictor to about 1.2 mm (standard restrictor size for the "normal" WRX) to avoid boost spikes when the turbo is spinning up. Furthermore look at your boost gauge if you drive in 5th and 6th gear at high revs (above 6.000 RPM), the boost shouldn´t exceed 1.0 bar to keep it safe!
Mark.
Mark.
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Don't have the STi 8 ROM files so don't know. I could get them if needed but I haven't done an STi 8 yet so not needed them. Maybe Bob or Pat or Ecutek would help.
[Edited by john banks - 4/6/2003 10:29:06 PM]
[Edited by john banks - 4/6/2003 10:29:06 PM]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Car Parts For Sale
1
18 November 2015 07:49 AM