wastegate pressure
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Just because the wastegate pressure is the same doesn't mean the ECU has to run the same boost, and that some turbos don't flow better than others.
The actual opening pressure depends on exhaust flow through the turbine, exhaust back pressure, wastegate size and bleeding off of boost from the actuator diaphragm by the wastegate solenoid.
But the actual arm will move at 0.5 bar +- tolerances. Boost control is achieved by making the diaphragm see only a proportion of the compressor outlet pressure. This is achieved closed loop (with variable gain depending on boost error) depending on boost targets, max/min duty cycles with compensations on some models for temperature/pressure.
[Edited by john banks - 1/20/2003 11:11:10 PM]
The actual opening pressure depends on exhaust flow through the turbine, exhaust back pressure, wastegate size and bleeding off of boost from the actuator diaphragm by the wastegate solenoid.
But the actual arm will move at 0.5 bar +- tolerances. Boost control is achieved by making the diaphragm see only a proportion of the compressor outlet pressure. This is achieved closed loop (with variable gain depending on boost error) depending on boost targets, max/min duty cycles with compensations on some models for temperature/pressure.
[Edited by john banks - 1/20/2003 11:11:10 PM]
#5
It doesnt matter what flow rates etc you have thru the exhaust turbine - pressure is pressure- as soon as the pressure reaches a certain limit the wastegate/pressure relief valve whatever u want to call it will open. I think wot u are talking about is bleed valves which fool the wastegate into thinking that the pressure is lower than it actually is - hence u get more boost before the wastegate opens. I dont think these are standard fit on production cars so there must be a difference in springing in the wastegate or if it is electronically controlled a difference in the ecu programming???
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Yes, suppose so. What I am saying is that the factory boost controller is an electronically controlled bleed, so yes the ECUs have different duty cycles and boost targets. In addition, some turbos are not far away from boost creep and others have the wastegate blown open easily at high RPM by EXHAUST flow not by boost pressure on the actuator. The different cars also have different restrictors off the compressor outlet which adjusts the control bandwidth of the factory boost contoller - which is narrow on the crap flowing 2 port solenoid models.
The ECU boost control on the Scooby is pretty standard stuff for a factory turbo car and there is lots of stuff out there on this method of control.
Fair to say that the boost control is a multivariable phenomenon, and not reducible to one single factor like wastegate spring strength.
[Edited by john banks - 1/21/2003 9:22:39 PM]
The ECU boost control on the Scooby is pretty standard stuff for a factory turbo car and there is lots of stuff out there on this method of control.
Fair to say that the boost control is a multivariable phenomenon, and not reducible to one single factor like wastegate spring strength.
[Edited by john banks - 1/21/2003 9:22:39 PM]
#7
In a way I see where your coming from but it sounds like a complicated solution to an easy problem. There's not much point in having a wastegate designed to open at a certain boost pressure if the exhaust vacuum created sucks the wastegate open at high RPM!
This means that the diaphragm is not actually doing anything??
The simplest and most effective way of increasing boost would be to just change the cracking pressure of the valve would it not?
This means that the diaphragm is not actually doing anything??
The simplest and most effective way of increasing boost would be to just change the cracking pressure of the valve would it not?
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Yes. Since exhaust back pressure on a small turbo can be considerably higher than boost pressure (and the boost pressure that the actuator sees is reduced by the work of the factory boost controller). The exhaust housing is just too small so the wastegate flap is literally blown open. Stronger wastegate helps, but you can have a x.y bar actuator on a turbo which will not make that boost at high RPM.
#10
Is the wastegate opening controlled through the ecu from a pressure sensor in the intake system and activated by a solenoid or is it just a mechanical valve? Do the systems vary depending on MY or are they all utilising the same design??
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Yes it can. Alter the manifold pressure sensor signal and change the size of the restrictor. This method let me run 22 PSI and 295 BHP on a 215 BHP car (with a few breathing mods and a different turbo). Cost £5 if you are any good with a soldering iron.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Nah, I meant the MAP signal modifier was a fiver, but just make sure it isn't detting if you are going to do this! It is engine blow up no problemo scenario if you get it wrong.
On the MY99/00 UK fuel cut is about 4V on the MAP sensor (17.6 PSI). The car as standard aims for 13.7 PSI held boost. About 0.1 V per PSI very approx, so to defend from 12.6 PSI you need a clamp above 3.5 V, ideally you would have it step back in to give a new fuel cut.
Someone somewhere will have a link to the DIY FCD thread....
On the MY99/00 UK fuel cut is about 4V on the MAP sensor (17.6 PSI). The car as standard aims for 13.7 PSI held boost. About 0.1 V per PSI very approx, so to defend from 12.6 PSI you need a clamp above 3.5 V, ideally you would have it step back in to give a new fuel cut.
Someone somewhere will have a link to the DIY FCD thread....
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
http://www.scoobynet.co.uk/bbs/threa...D=70491&Page=1
Here is one of them If that doesn't faze you there is a DIY EBC using a uC and a further DIY FCD thread entitled "DIY FCD results" which had my final cheapo really simple design, but it does mean soldering and making up a board with an 8 pin DIL on it. In the end I had the offer to remap ECUs instead - much easier but it was all good fun and I learned a lot from all the bolt ons
Here is one of them If that doesn't faze you there is a DIY EBC using a uC and a further DIY FCD thread entitled "DIY FCD results" which had my final cheapo really simple design, but it does mean soldering and making up a board with an 8 pin DIL on it. In the end I had the offer to remap ECUs instead - much easier but it was all good fun and I learned a lot from all the bolt ons
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Do lots of research first, and be paranoid about detonation. Good luck and don't blame me if it goes pear shaped. No reason it should, but use caution. Seeing your profile I expect you know what you are doing.
Knocklink is a good idea, nay essential.
Knocklink is a good idea, nay essential.
#20
On the fuels side of things I am experimenting with a setup for running on methanol fuel. Not sure if a scooby has been run on MeOH before. Taking it one step at a time at the moment. I have another car that I use as a bench test. Its not only the ignition and fueling that are to be dealt with but other things like corrosion, lubricity and the problems encountered with hygroscopic fuels. Applying it to turbo engines is the next step!
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
There was a recent thread (well last few months anyway) about naughty fuels, additives etc and these octane mad guys were using paint thinners IIRC. Andy F has used methanol through an injector, think he has also put it in the tank.
#22
You cant just use methanol as a direct replacement for gasoline as the densities and volumes required are all different. A lot of people say yeh I tried methanol and i got loads more power. Its all bull****, I calculated that replacing with methanol will actually cut power. You only see the benefits when you modify the fueling and compression ratio. Approx twice the volume of methanol is required when cf gasoline so..........
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aaron_ions
General Technical
14
25 September 2015 02:33 PM
aaron_ions
General Technical
1
17 September 2015 10:42 AM