Windows
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Windows
OK - I accept it is not the most recent release - XP - but Windows is truly awful!
I needed to do a quick email check this morning that ended up taking over 20 minutes on my clients Windows machine. Just waking it up from its slumber involved four minutes of disk thrashing before it would respond. Then additional countless minutes trying to connect to public wifi.
I eventually gave up. Opened my Mac, connected in a few seconds, into webmail in a few seconds. Sorted.
Why there are so many Windows supporters baffles me - have they all been brainwashed by Gates and Balmer et al?
Of course you cannot knock the marketing machine at Microsoft, style over substance, getting just about every manufacturer to send out PCs and Laptops preloaded with this crap.
I needed to do a quick email check this morning that ended up taking over 20 minutes on my clients Windows machine. Just waking it up from its slumber involved four minutes of disk thrashing before it would respond. Then additional countless minutes trying to connect to public wifi.
I eventually gave up. Opened my Mac, connected in a few seconds, into webmail in a few seconds. Sorted.
Why there are so many Windows supporters baffles me - have they all been brainwashed by Gates and Balmer et al?
Of course you cannot knock the marketing machine at Microsoft, style over substance, getting just about every manufacturer to send out PCs and Laptops preloaded with this crap.
Last edited by Trout; 13 December 2010 at 07:42 AM.
#3
I switch our 8 year old xp office pc on and go and have breakfast as it takes that long to fire up.
My laptop with W7 however only takes a few seconds.
And it doesn't appear to be getting any worse over time as previous versions do.
I would like a MAC and will no doubt get one soon.
My laptop with W7 however only takes a few seconds.
And it doesn't appear to be getting any worse over time as previous versions do.
I would like a MAC and will no doubt get one soon.
Last edited by MMT WRX; 13 December 2010 at 08:00 AM.
#4
Scooby Senior
XP stripped bare is OK. Windows 7 is pretty good, but every now and then the disguise slips and you find NT on your machine.
I do find it amusing when people bash OSX, but use Windows.
I do find it amusing when people bash OSX, but use Windows.
Trending Topics
#9
This is really only a debate if run on the same spec hardware and same age operating system.
Even if machines were both of a similar spec, comparing an aged XP against a current OS X is still an unfair fight.
Even if machines were both of a similar spec, comparing an aged XP against a current OS X is still an unfair fight.
#10
#15
Scooby Regular
it is the shared DLL architecture that causes this type of slowdown
interestingly Mickysoft/Windows are moving to virtualising applications -- which in a roundabout way is taking Mickysoft back to the days of DOS
interestingly Mickysoft/Windows are moving to virtualising applications -- which in a roundabout way is taking Mickysoft back to the days of DOS
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 13 December 2010 at 08:01 PM.
#23
Scooby Regular
reason most like wondows is it familier,IE 80% of the world use it in business and pleasure,
If yout IT litrate theres no doubt the MAC is a nice pimp machine with a great opp sys, just look at the ipad and Iphone cracking machine in fact best in class.
Its all down to what people are used to
my works laptop takes 20 mins to boot because of all the **** work puts on policies etc etc, plus the hardware is utter IBM pooness.
But my windows 7 on my I7 PC with 12 gig ram SSd drive is the fastest ive seen.
ive still not succomb to buy a mac id like 1 for the reliablilty, i,ll still boot camp it though.
If yout IT litrate theres no doubt the MAC is a nice pimp machine with a great opp sys, just look at the ipad and Iphone cracking machine in fact best in class.
Its all down to what people are used to
my works laptop takes 20 mins to boot because of all the **** work puts on policies etc etc, plus the hardware is utter IBM pooness.
But my windows 7 on my I7 PC with 12 gig ram SSd drive is the fastest ive seen.
ive still not succomb to buy a mac id like 1 for the reliablilty, i,ll still boot camp it though.
#24
Whats the fascination with Mac's
Horrid machines, back in the 80,s and still horrid now
who wants a machine that you had to tell it to eject a disc.
And then would make you wait whilst it wiped a program disk, because there
was no manual eject button and insisted on no write protection on said disk.
Still if early learning style stuff floats your boat its up to you.
I'll stick with windows, might be clunky and have probs, but it works
Mart
Horrid machines, back in the 80,s and still horrid now
who wants a machine that you had to tell it to eject a disc.
And then would make you wait whilst it wiped a program disk, because there
was no manual eject button and insisted on no write protection on said disk.
Still if early learning style stuff floats your boat its up to you.
I'll stick with windows, might be clunky and have probs, but it works
Mart
#25
Scooby Senior
Marty360 McFly, welcome to the year 2010. Unfortunately all the Mac features you hated back in the 80's have been adopted by all top notch operating systems here in your future. You bet on Betamax, now hop back in the Delorean and find some Apple love.
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Yep. That'll be it. Plus, how much memory in the machine?
The *corporate* builds I've used have been truly awful speed-wise, purely down to the ridiculous SW that *has* to be installed.
Dave
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
hardcoreimpreza
Computer & Technology Related
21
11 October 2015 03:40 PM