SATA Raid Cards
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
SATA Raid Cards
Does one exist that does the following:
Supports Raid 5
Supports Online Spares
Supports Background Rebuilding
A plus would also be supports more than 4 disks??
Reasonable Price
Ive been working with HP SmartArray controllers too long which do all the above and more on scsi
David
Supports Raid 5
Supports Online Spares
Supports Background Rebuilding
A plus would also be supports more than 4 disks??
Reasonable Price
Ive been working with HP SmartArray controllers too long which do all the above and more on scsi
David
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
theres lots more at scan than there is at ccl.. cant believe I didnt look on the scan website!
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cambs
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi David,
If you are after proper controlers:
http://www.areca.com.tw/index/html/ do some intresting stuff,
various uk retailers stock their stuff such as http://www.xcase.co.uk/acatalog/Controller_Cards.html
and just in case you looking to build a SAN, fiber channel is dead long live iSCSI
If you are after proper controlers:
http://www.areca.com.tw/index/html/ do some intresting stuff,
various uk retailers stock their stuff such as http://www.xcase.co.uk/acatalog/Controller_Cards.html
and just in case you looking to build a SAN, fiber channel is dead long live iSCSI
#6
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
you really recon fibrechannel is dead? **** Iscsi thats dead before it began.. try SAS..
Not looking to build a SAN. Just want around 1.2Tb of storage on my server at home
Not looking to build a SAN. Just want around 1.2Tb of storage on my server at home
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cambs
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[quote=David_Wallis]you really recon fibrechannel is dead? **** Iscsi thats dead before it began.. try SAS..
Nope, iSCSI is a bit different, I dont think you tried it so don't understand its potential
iSCSI uses SCSI like disk attachment over Ethernet and IP instead of fiberchannel. So you have virtauly no distance limitation (within latency limits) and its availible to your whole LAN/MAN etc as any IP service and the cost is reduced by a huge factor.
Nope, iSCSI is a bit different, I dont think you tried it so don't understand its potential
iSCSI uses SCSI like disk attachment over Ethernet and IP instead of fiberchannel. So you have virtauly no distance limitation (within latency limits) and its availible to your whole LAN/MAN etc as any IP service and the cost is reduced by a huge factor.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I know exactly what iSCSI is, I just think its uses are limited, I think its perfectly good in the right environment. IE blade servers and a big SAN such as the HP MSA's / IBM ESS and maybe so you can mirror disks easily between data centres or have a proper cluster, but I just dont like the idea of it and havent seen many instances of it apart from on NAS boxes, but we'll ignore that! as I have a dislike for NAS devices.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM