Notices
Computer & Technology Related Post here for help and discussion of computing and related technology. Internet, TVs, phones, consoles, computers, tablets and any other gadgets.

'Super Duper' Memory really essential?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17 September 2005, 05:18 PM
  #1  
djuk
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
djuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 'Super Duper' Memory really essential?

I'm going to be upgrading my motherboard and processor this week and now I'm considering what RAM to fit.

Currently I run 768mb of PC2100 DDR (3 sticks from different manufacturers) which to be fair has run absolutely fine.

The thing is things seem to have gone a bit wierd in the memory market since I last purchased and theres now products like Crucial Ballistix, OCZ premium, etc which are all a bit more expensive.

Now I do play a bit of CS:S and Battlefield2 but I'm by no means a 'serious' gamer and I've not really had major performance issues on my current system which is an Athlon XP 2200 running at 1800mhz with 768mb PC2100 DDR and a Radeon 9800 Pro 128mb DDR graphics card.

So do I pay through the nose for 'performance' memory or would something like OCZ's or Crucial's standard PC3200 offerings be adequate.

The new system will consist of a DFI Lanparty UT nforce3 motherboard with an athlon 3000 64bit processor.

Thx

David
Old 17 September 2005, 06:00 PM
  #2  
russell hayward
Scooby Regular
 
russell hayward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just upgraded by system to AMD64 3800+, A8nsli board and find my Kingston memory is working fine.

Obviously the dearer it is usually means it can run more agressive timing and can also be a bit more overclock friendly

I personally would go for the standard memory and buy a better processor
Old 17 September 2005, 07:46 PM
  #3  
jfrf
Scooby Regular
 
jfrf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

standard memory is fine as far as im concerned. the amount of memory is more important to me.
battlefiled 2 runs smoother with at leatst 1.3 gig if youare running high graphics settings
I recently upgraded from 1 gig to 2.
Old 18 September 2005, 02:57 PM
  #4  
Smurf2k
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Smurf2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by the broken lamp post
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Go for Twinmos memory, Not as pricey as the likes of crucial, ocz or kingston but just as good and its clockable too
Old 18 September 2005, 08:18 PM
  #5  
jpor
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jpor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Corsair value is quite good too. Apprrently the CL rating isn't important these days with DDR RAM.
Old 18 September 2005, 09:19 PM
  #6  
porlkertus
Scooby Regular
 
porlkertus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Performance memory is really for those of us who wish to squeeze the absolute maximum from a rig.

If you dont game much - its not for you.

Kingston, Crucial, Corsair and Twinmos are all fine.
Old 18 September 2005, 09:26 PM
  #7  
djuk
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
djuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was actually going to buy some basic crucial memory earlier but managed to ****** a good deal on 2 x 256mb sticks of Crucial Ballistix PC3200 on ebay at the last second so I will see how they go
Old 19 September 2005, 06:22 PM
  #8  
Daz34
Scooby Regular
 
Daz34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: here
Posts: 10,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djuk
I was actually going to buy some basic crucial memory earlier but managed to ****** a good deal on 2 x 256mb sticks of Crucial Ballistix PC3200 on ebay at the last second so I will see how they go

The problem you have there is that you will soon find that 512mb won't be enough for the likes of BF2 and will need to add more which means upto four sticks af RAM. This is more likely to impede performance than having 2 x 512mb or 2 x 1024mb.
Old 19 September 2005, 06:56 PM
  #9  
djuk
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
djuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Daz34
The problem you have there is that you will soon find that 512mb won't be enough for the likes of BF2 and will need to add more which means upto four sticks af RAM. This is more likely to impede performance than having 2 x 512mb or 2 x 1024mb.
Well maybe given the good deal I got on the first two I can squeeze another couple of sticks into the budget. I'm not sure I'm so up on the technology that I'd notice the difference between the 4 x 256mb and 2 x 512mb configs.

Last edited by djuk; 19 September 2005 at 06:58 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimBowen
ICE
5
02 July 2023 01:54 PM
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
XRS
Computer & Technology Related
18
16 October 2015 01:38 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
InTurbo
ScoobyNet General
21
30 September 2015 08:59 PM



Quick Reply: 'Super Duper' Memory really essential?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:55 AM.