Photoshop 7 help - URGENT
#1
I have just installed Photoshop 7 but when I try to run it then it says
Please help as I am tearing my hair out now. Why won't it work?
[Edited by Badger Stuffer - 4/15/2003 10:02:55 AM]
"Crogram Files\Abobe\Photoshop7.0\photoshop.exe is not a valid Win 32 application.
[Edited by Badger Stuffer - 4/15/2003 10:02:55 AM]
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Gloucestershire, home of the lawnmower.
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe because C:\program Files\Abobe\Photoshop7.0\photoshop.exe is not a Win32 application ?
Maybe because it a rip off copy ?
Go buy the genuine package and then you won't have any problems.
Bloody pirates.
Ian
[Edited by IWatkins - 4/15/2003 10:49:48 AM]
Maybe because it a rip off copy ?
Go buy the genuine package and then you won't have any problems.
Bloody pirates.
Ian
[Edited by IWatkins - 4/15/2003 10:49:48 AM]
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Gloucestershire, home of the lawnmower.
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cmon, you were asking for a rip off copy on this very forum just the other day. So I'll stick by my deduction that it is a rip off copy.
Whether it works or not for you, I couldn't care less.
Try thinking about those people who write software for a living. Sales of software keeps them in a job.
Cheers
Ian
Whether it works or not for you, I couldn't care less.
Try thinking about those people who write software for a living. Sales of software keeps them in a job.
Cheers
Ian
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I doubt anyones being 'ripped off' here tbo.
If someone, for whatever reason, cannot or will not pay £600 for Photoshop 7 then who exactly is losing out here?
Adobe is losing nothing as it is highly unlikely that an individual would buy it at such a high price anyway, self employed graphics artist excluded.
Now if a large company or corporation decided to add a few extra client machines with said software (which they do all the time) then Adobe is deffo getting ripped off now, as these companies can well afford it.
Wierd logic I know, but this logic was applied in a test case in the USA where a young lad had pirated software worth thousands on his PC. The lads lawyer argued on the above grounds and the case was flung out.
And no I do not condone software piracy, but I still doubt if Adobe or anyone else has lost money or has been 'ripped off' by Badger Stuffer 'aquiring' a 'free' copy (if he even did).
If someone, for whatever reason, cannot or will not pay £600 for Photoshop 7 then who exactly is losing out here?
Adobe is losing nothing as it is highly unlikely that an individual would buy it at such a high price anyway, self employed graphics artist excluded.
Now if a large company or corporation decided to add a few extra client machines with said software (which they do all the time) then Adobe is deffo getting ripped off now, as these companies can well afford it.
Wierd logic I know, but this logic was applied in a test case in the USA where a young lad had pirated software worth thousands on his PC. The lads lawyer argued on the above grounds and the case was flung out.
And no I do not condone software piracy, but I still doubt if Adobe or anyone else has lost money or has been 'ripped off' by Badger Stuffer 'aquiring' a 'free' copy (if he even did).
Trending Topics
#8
It is a full working copy that have got via FTp from a very nice Scoobynetter. It is only so that I can play around with pictures for posting on here and I would never have bought it for that money just for the little use it will get.
All the "Piracy" posters....Have you never: recorded a cd, recorded off the radio, downloaded anything and cracked it, etc.
People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
All the "Piracy" posters....Have you never: recorded a cd, recorded off the radio, downloaded anything and cracked it, etc.
People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Blow Dog
Non Scooby Related
4
16 September 2001 12:22 PM