Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

GT3582R or GT4094?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 26, 2013 | 09:20 PM
  #1  
seventune's Avatar
seventune
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 233
Likes: 8
From: North London
Default GT3582R or GT4094?????

Hey people,

Having a hard time keeping a sensible on this one....

My MD321T is a little worse for ware and I'm replacing it with a GT3582R. Its on a 2.1ltr stroker + supporting ancillaries yada yada.

Now the reason for the title id that I have to buy the GT35 but I have in my possession a pair of GT4094's that will be going on my 20B RX7..... but that's not even close to being ready for the engine let alone the turbos etc...

My question is views on the GT40 on the scoob. Oh and this is literally the car I drive to and from work in every day its not a weekend warrior.

Last edited by seventune; Sep 26, 2013 at 10:01 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2013 | 09:29 PM
  #2  
jura11's Avatar
jura11
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,523
Likes: 1
Default

Hi there


Not sure,but GT3582R can be too little bit big for 2.1L,depends on cams and what fuel you will be using,but you can find this turbo laggier,GT4094 not sure how will perform on 2.1L,but I would say will be laggy

You will be running AVCS?

For reasonable spool GTX4094 you will need 2.35L with AVCS and NOS which helps with spool up

Maybe GTX3576 or something like GT30 .63AR will be better suited yours car


Jura
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2013 | 10:00 PM
  #3  
seventune's Avatar
seventune
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 233
Likes: 8
From: North London
Default

35 would be fine for the 2.1. It's an extremely well balanced turbo. The issue is I don't need to buy a 40. I have 2!
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2013 | 10:30 PM
  #4  
seventune's Avatar
seventune
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 233
Likes: 8
From: North London
Default

Also I mean what constitutes laggy over a 35? Are we saying the 40 will come in 500 rpm later? 1,000 rpm later? Anyone got any experience with one?
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2013 | 10:45 PM
  #5  
jura11's Avatar
jura11
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,523
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by seventune
35 would be fine for the 2.1. It's an extremely well balanced turbo. The issue is I don't need to buy a 40. I have 2!
Yes can be perfect with right setup

Speak over here with MartynJ or AlanJ@EngineTuner about the GT4094,I think they tried GTX4094 on the 2.1L


Jura
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2013 | 10:55 PM
  #6  
seventune's Avatar
seventune
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 233
Likes: 8
From: North London
Default

Yeah,

Not saying that its a goer or weather it would work, but would be interesting. RCM's GSII runs a EJ20 with 4094. Appreciated engine specs are just a touch different to mine !
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 02:38 AM
  #7  
4evernewbie's Avatar
4evernewbie
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Telford
Default

Originally Posted by seventune
RCM's GSII runs a EJ20 with 4094. Appreciated engine specs are just a touch different to mine !
RCM spend a LOT of time and money on research on the best way to spend time and money!

Gobstopper 1 (can we call it that now?) had a rather large dose of NOS to improve spool/lag, god knows what Gobstopper 2 is running but it'll be hardcore either way.
I'm in the process of fitting a 35R to my 2.1 so I'm hoping it won't be a bad option.

Paul
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 04:58 AM
  #8  
stonejedi's Avatar
stonejedi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,439
Likes: 149
Default

I'm with Jura on this one a Gt30 and a 2.1 stroker is a ideal match up I know plenty of 2.35 cars run the Gt35r but even quite a few of them are reverting back to the Gt30 i guess it all comes down to what supporting mods you have to aid the spool up with the bigger turbos as said by 4evernewbie olley from RCM uses a lot of NOS to get those bigger turbos spinning up,so I would have to think that yes the 4094 turbo would be quite laggy on your car.SJ.

Last edited by stonejedi; Sep 27, 2013 at 05:07 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 07:16 AM
  #9  
H4RDY-P1's Avatar
H4RDY-P1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield
Default

The gt40 will be totally pointless for road use,it might just come on boost before you get to work.
Im also in the process of fitting a gt35 to my 2.1 and im worried this is gonna be laggy.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2013 | 09:59 AM
  #10  
seventune's Avatar
seventune
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 233
Likes: 8
From: North London
Default

35 isn't too large at all. You have to get the ancillaries right.correct size intercooler not ridiculously oversized so you lose turbo efficiency but not too small that you loose thermal efficiency of the core. Right sized pipe work etc. Match that with the right size exhaust you have very manageable car.

Yeah to be honest I kind know the 40 is too big, but when you have two of them sitting on the shelf stearing at you you have to ask the questions.

I did speak to rcm this morning. It's not the 40 is too large for the 2.1 as it will spool it. Just end up with a narrow power band for a road car.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drewtts
Subaru
29
Apr 14, 2014 11:47 AM
chasey
ScoobyNet General
12
Nov 18, 2013 07:29 AM
stonejedi
Subaru Parts
25
Nov 12, 2013 01:13 PM
jura11
Member's Gallery
32
Jun 30, 2013 07:46 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 AM.