Labour to re-introduce 50% Tax Rate ...
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure I understand what you mean by 'lowest common denominator' though?
#32
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Curlew FPSO
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They need higher tax bands in my eyes. 50% when somebody earns 101k is harsh if they earn £500k not so much so. Footballers earn millions and only pay 10% more tax than me I fail to see how that is fair?
I pay tens of thousands of £s a year tax. We have a child and get what back? Sweet FA that's what really annoys me!
I pay tens of thousands of £s a year tax. We have a child and get what back? Sweet FA that's what really annoys me!
#33
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
They need higher tax bands in my eyes. 50% when somebody earns 101k is harsh if they earn £500k not so much so. Footballers earn millions and only pay 10% more tax than me I fail to see how that is fair?
I pay tens of thousands of £s a year tax. We have a child and get what back? Sweet FA that's what really annoys me!
I pay tens of thousands of £s a year tax. We have a child and get what back? Sweet FA that's what really annoys me!
#34
“No man in this country is under the smallest obligation, moral or other, so to arrange his legal relations to his business or to his property as to enable the Inland Revenue to put the largest possible shovel into his stores. The Inland Revenue is not slow – and quite rightly – to take every advantage which is open to it under the taxing statutes for the purpose of depleting the taxpayer’s pocket. And the taxpayer is, in like manner, entitled to be astute to prevent, so far as he honestly can, the depletion of his means by the Revenue.” - Lord Clyde
#35
Why should I pay for your crotch fruit as a single and childless man? We can go on like this all day.
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quite a valid point TBH, I'm childless as well but spend six months of the year offshore, maybe I should only pay 50% council tax as I only use 50% of the water, refuse and everything else that everyone else does?
#37
Scooby Regular
I object to any maintenance of the roads north of Worksop
I rarely travel north of Worksop and when I do I have a large 4x4
After all it is not as if they produce much wealth for the country (jock land maybe an exception)
I rarely travel north of Worksop and when I do I have a large 4x4
After all it is not as if they produce much wealth for the country (jock land maybe an exception)
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 29 January 2014 at 09:26 AM.
#38
I have read the article, I wouldn't have posted it up if I didn't! If the agreed services provided through the limited company as stated in the contract with the client puts you outside the scope of IR35, what exactly are you saying is 'of questionable legalitiy' with this arrangement?
#39
They need higher tax bands in my eyes. 50% when somebody earns 101k is harsh if they earn £500k not so much so. Footballers earn millions and only pay 10% more tax than me I fail to see how that is fair?
I pay tens of thousands of £s a year tax. We have a child and get what back? Sweet FA that's what really annoys me!
I pay tens of thousands of £s a year tax. We have a child and get what back? Sweet FA that's what really annoys me!
I actually think we should all have the same personal allowance, then everyone pays the same rate beyond that. No higher rate, no super tax etc. The people who earn more, pay more. Tiered rates are unfair.
#40
I don't understand your argument about the tax rate for the footballer being unfair? You say 'only 10%' more than you, but that is 10% extra on a huge amount of money, so he is actually paying huge multiples more than you (I take it you're a 40% tax payer, therefore under £150k/year). Let's say the footballer earns £2m/year, he is going to be paying nigh on £1m in tax (slightly less given the lower tax rate on his lower earnings). So it's all relative.
I actually think we should all have the same personal allowance, then everyone pays the same rate beyond that. No higher rate, no super tax etc. The people who earn more, pay more. Tiered rates are unfair.
I actually think we should all have the same personal allowance, then everyone pays the same rate beyond that. No higher rate, no super tax etc. The people who earn more, pay more. Tiered rates are unfair.
#41
Perhaps an argument might be that if it wasn't paid in income tax it would be paid through other means - people with higher disposable income would spend more etc etc.
#42
I have read the article, I wouldn't have posted it up if I didn't! If the agreed services provided through the limited company as stated in the contract with the client puts you outside the scope of IR35, what exactly are you saying is 'of questionable legalitiy' with this arrangement?
#43
I'm too busy now to read the thing again but it mentions 'disguised employment' and that there is legislation which HRMC can arm itself with; if all your 'contracting' is with the same company and you wind up your 'business' only to resurrect it again (so you can realise your 'profit' via liquidation). In no way does the article say this avoidance scheme is cut and dried. It's murky and could get you in trouble was my impression.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post