Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Labour to re-introduce 50% Tax Rate ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28 January 2014, 11:32 PM
  #31  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by c_maguire
As long as it is 'One person, one vote' the easiest way to win an election will always be to buy off the lowest common denominator. It's cheaper and there is a herd mentality.

There is one caveat of course.
And that involves ensuring they actually do vote at all.
I kind of agree with this, generally we insist that politician tell us what we want to hear... oh and then get all stroppy because they cannot actually deliver.

Not sure I understand what you mean by 'lowest common denominator' though?
Old 28 January 2014, 11:45 PM
  #32  
Ciaran
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Ciaran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Curlew FPSO
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They need higher tax bands in my eyes. 50% when somebody earns 101k is harsh if they earn £500k not so much so. Footballers earn millions and only pay 10% more tax than me I fail to see how that is fair?
I pay tens of thousands of £s a year tax. We have a child and get what back? Sweet FA that's what really annoys me!
Old 29 January 2014, 12:33 AM
  #33  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ciaran
They need higher tax bands in my eyes. 50% when somebody earns 101k is harsh if they earn £500k not so much so. Footballers earn millions and only pay 10% more tax than me I fail to see how that is fair?
I pay tens of thousands of £s a year tax. We have a child and get what back? Sweet FA that's what really annoys me!
The problem isn't that footballers 'only' get taxed 10% more than you, it's that we've all got so used to the idea of handing over 40% and more of our hard-earned to the government that we think it's totally normal now.
Old 29 January 2014, 08:53 AM
  #34  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
“No man in this country is under the smallest obligation, moral or other, so to arrange his legal relations to his business or to his property as to enable the Inland Revenue to put the largest possible shovel into his stores. The Inland Revenue is not slow – and quite rightly – to take every advantage which is open to it under the taxing statutes for the purpose of depleting the taxpayer’s pocket. And the taxpayer is, in like manner, entitled to be astute to prevent, so far as he honestly can, the depletion of his means by the Revenue.” - Lord Clyde
Yes but avoiding tax through being a one man business is of questionable legality which is my point, not that it is somehow 'immoral'. Read the article.
Old 29 January 2014, 08:56 AM
  #35  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ciaran
I pay tens of thousands of £s a year tax. We have a child and get what back? Sweet FA that's what really annoys me!
Your child is presumably going to use the NHS and could use a state funded school?

Why should I pay for your crotch fruit as a single and childless man? We can go on like this all day.
Old 29 January 2014, 09:03 AM
  #36  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Your child is presumably going to use the NHS and could use a state funded school?

Why should I pay for your crotch fruit as a single and childless man? We can go on like this all day.
Quite a valid point TBH, I'm childless as well but spend six months of the year offshore, maybe I should only pay 50% council tax as I only use 50% of the water, refuse and everything else that everyone else does?
Old 29 January 2014, 09:24 AM
  #37  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

I object to any maintenance of the roads north of Worksop

I rarely travel north of Worksop and when I do I have a large 4x4

After all it is not as if they produce much wealth for the country (jock land maybe an exception)

Last edited by hodgy0_2; 29 January 2014 at 09:26 AM.
Old 29 January 2014, 09:36 AM
  #38  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Yes but avoiding tax through being a one man business is of questionable legality which is my point, not that it is somehow 'immoral'. Read the article.
I have read the article, I wouldn't have posted it up if I didn't! If the agreed services provided through the limited company as stated in the contract with the client puts you outside the scope of IR35, what exactly are you saying is 'of questionable legalitiy' with this arrangement?
Old 29 January 2014, 10:04 AM
  #39  
Butkus
Scooby Regular
 
Butkus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ciaran
They need higher tax bands in my eyes. 50% when somebody earns 101k is harsh if they earn £500k not so much so. Footballers earn millions and only pay 10% more tax than me I fail to see how that is fair?
I pay tens of thousands of £s a year tax. We have a child and get what back? Sweet FA that's what really annoys me!
I don't understand your argument about the tax rate for the footballer being unfair? You say 'only 10%' more than you, but that is 10% extra on a huge amount of money, so he is actually paying huge multiples more than you (I take it you're a 40% tax payer, therefore under £150k/year). Let's say the footballer earns £2m/year, he is going to be paying nigh on £1m in tax (slightly less given the lower tax rate on his lower earnings). So it's all relative.

I actually think we should all have the same personal allowance, then everyone pays the same rate beyond that. No higher rate, no super tax etc. The people who earn more, pay more. Tiered rates are unfair.
Old 29 January 2014, 10:17 AM
  #40  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Butkus
I don't understand your argument about the tax rate for the footballer being unfair? You say 'only 10%' more than you, but that is 10% extra on a huge amount of money, so he is actually paying huge multiples more than you (I take it you're a 40% tax payer, therefore under £150k/year). Let's say the footballer earns £2m/year, he is going to be paying nigh on £1m in tax (slightly less given the lower tax rate on his lower earnings). So it's all relative.

I actually think we should all have the same personal allowance, then everyone pays the same rate beyond that. No higher rate, no super tax etc. The people who earn more, pay more. Tiered rates are unfair.
You'd have to increase the rate by some margin if everyone started paying the same rate, don't forget the 1% who are the top rate payers account for a third of all the income tax revenue.
Old 29 January 2014, 10:31 AM
  #41  
Butkus
Scooby Regular
 
Butkus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
You'd have to increase the rate by some margin if everyone started paying the same rate, don't forget the 1% who are the top rate payers account for a third of all the income tax revenue.
Yes, my argument is more one of principle rather than practicality. You're earning more, therefore you're paying more, so why does the rate have to go up at certain points? A bit like the stamp duty thresholds - more expensive house equals bigger tax bill, so why is the percentage increased too?

Perhaps an argument might be that if it wasn't paid in income tax it would be paid through other means - people with higher disposable income would spend more etc etc.
Old 29 January 2014, 01:50 PM
  #42  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
I have read the article, I wouldn't have posted it up if I didn't! If the agreed services provided through the limited company as stated in the contract with the client puts you outside the scope of IR35, what exactly are you saying is 'of questionable legalitiy' with this arrangement?
I'm too busy now to read the thing again but it mentions 'disguised employment' and that there is legislation which HRMC can arm itself with; if all your 'contracting' is with the same company and you wind up your 'business' only to resurrect it again (so you can realise your 'profit' via liquidation). In no way does the article say this avoidance scheme is cut and dried. It's murky and could get you in trouble was my impression.
Old 29 January 2014, 03:01 PM
  #43  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
I'm too busy now to read the thing again but it mentions 'disguised employment' and that there is legislation which HRMC can arm itself with; if all your 'contracting' is with the same company and you wind up your 'business' only to resurrect it again (so you can realise your 'profit' via liquidation). In no way does the article say this avoidance scheme is cut and dried. It's murky and could get you in trouble was my impression.
It is possible you can get caught out by HMRC, but if you do your homework, get confirmation that your contract is IR35 'friendly' and you stay within the terms and condition of the contract, then there is no problem, hence why HMRC have had very limited success with this legislation despite the hundreds of thousands of contractors out there and the millions of contracts fulfilled over the years.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scoobhunter722
ScoobyNet General
52
20 October 2015 04:32 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
InTurbo
ScoobyNet General
21
30 September 2015 08:59 PM
crazyspeedfreakz
ScoobyNet General
5
29 September 2015 05:04 PM
Littleted
Computer & Technology Related
0
25 September 2015 08:44 AM



Quick Reply: Labour to re-introduce 50% Tax Rate ...



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24 AM.