Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

WRX vs STI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24 November 2013, 08:49 PM
  #151  
scoobyboy1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
scoobyboy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Willenhall, West Midlands
Posts: 7,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joshnosh
theres a decent looking topmount on the bay for 130 or so
i shoudnt need to get my injectors changed. i wount be using them much (wheres the evil smiley when you need it!)
£130 is a good price, compared to 2005 when I paid £250

Changed mine to STi pinks back then, depends what turbo you going for if your going to change them!
Old 24 November 2013, 08:51 PM
  #152  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Donnie Brasco 46
Your answer....

2.5 STI PPP
316 BHP
332llbs
0-60 - 4.8
0-100 - 12.2
30-70 - 4.7

2.5 WRX PPP
266 BHP
310 llbs
0-60 - 5.3
0-100 - 14
30-70 - 5.2
Looks to me like the 2.0L WRX PPP is still the daddy.
Old 24 November 2013, 08:52 PM
  #153  
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Standing Up
Posts: 16,742
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Makes good reading, utter fiction in reality Most PPP WRX's don't make anywhere near 261bhp as claimed, mine certainly didn't and nor did my mates When questioned the dealer wasn't that excited about the PPP either

Generic maps FTL
Old 24 November 2013, 08:53 PM
  #154  
scoobyboy1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
scoobyboy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Willenhall, West Midlands
Posts: 7,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bustaMOVEs
Lol you spent £12k on mods and kept the chocolate brakes
AP 6 Pots at the front with 356mm discs!!!

Standard brakes on the back!!!
Old 24 November 2013, 08:54 PM
  #155  
joshnosh
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
joshnosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: bedfordshire, UK
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scoobyboy1
£130 is a good price, compared to 2005 when I paid £250

Changed mine to STi pinks back then, depends what turbo you going for if your going to change them!
no turbo change probably
i want my car to boost early and spool fast
haha ill just have to run lower power when im not on gas if the injectors cant hanndle it
Old 24 November 2013, 08:57 PM
  #156  
Donnie Brasco 46
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Donnie Brasco 46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Herts
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scoobyboy1
So a Blob WRX PPP does the same 0-60 as a 2.5 STi PPP

Must be a Prodrive masterpiece the blob WRX PPP, have Prodrive come up with anything quicker since then???
Those figures are available for everyone to read on the prodrive website - they're not plucked out of the sky. what can't speak can't lie...

I find them surprising too bearing in mind the extra torque of the 2.5. Maybe the hawkeye is heavier? Just a guess
Old 24 November 2013, 09:06 PM
  #157  
bustaMOVEs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
bustaMOVEs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The 2dr club
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scoobyboy1
AP 6 Pots at the front with 356mm discs!!!

Standard brakes on the back!!!
Ah lol, let you off, the red gave it away but ap are red too
Old 24 November 2013, 09:11 PM
  #158  
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Standing Up
Posts: 16,742
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joshnosh
why would you assume that?
Because you implied your age prohibited the purchase of an STi

An STi will be cheaper to insure than a WRX with retro fitted parts to get to the 'same' spec
Old 24 November 2013, 09:22 PM
  #159  
SRSport
Scooby Regular
 
SRSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 3,360
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would love to get a Spec D STI but the weak engines going pop means that a WRX would be the only consideration. Not much point in having the go faster version when it's sitting stationary on the hard shoulder.
Old 24 November 2013, 09:27 PM
  #160  
pflowers
Scooby Regular
 
pflowers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cymru
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think I am right in saying the STI wont reach 60 in second gear whereas the WRX will so that's why the WRX is quicker on paper due to one less gear change?
Old 24 November 2013, 09:31 PM
  #161  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by pflowers
I think I am right in saying the STI wont reach 60 in second gear whereas the WRX will so that's why the WRX is quicker on paper due to one less gear change?
yes correct
Old 24 November 2013, 09:32 PM
  #162  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SRSport
I would love to get a Spec D STI but the weak engines going pop means that a WRX would be the only consideration. Not much point in having the go faster version when it's sitting stationary on the hard shoulder.
the 2.5 wrx engine has the same issues
Old 24 November 2013, 09:36 PM
  #163  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 53
Makes good reading, utter fiction in reality Most PPP WRX's don't make anywhere near 261bhp as claimed, mine certainly didn't and nor did my mates When questioned the dealer wasn't that excited about the PPP either

Generic maps FTL
The 2001-2005 Newage WRX wasn't allowed to challenge, or surpass for that matter, the STI, the PPP figures were closer to 225 than 261 and the Cat up-pipe might as well be known as an 'STI blush saving device.'

As for 0-60 I can imagine both are about 5.5 in standard trim with an actual 261bhp WRX making the STI wish it could trade its 265bhp enabling gearbox, block and brakes for a jet engine...

I rolling roaded my PPP at AET and found it gave 187.3 at the wheels. After a remap I got to the prophesied 260bhp and I've yet to see an STI, mainly classics, get within 30 yards of my car when I'm up to the legal limit.
Old 24 November 2013, 09:38 PM
  #164  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
The 2001-2005 Newage WRX wasn't allowed to challenge, or surpass for that matter, the STI, the PPP figures were closer to 225 than 261 and the Cat up-pipe might as well be known as an 'STI blush saving device.'

As for 0-60 I can imagine both are about 5.5 in standard trim with an actual 261bhp WRX making the STI wish it could trade its 265bhp enabling gearbox, block and brakes for a jet engine...

I rolling roaded my PPP at AET and found it gave 187.3 at the wheels. After a remap I got to the prophesied 260bhp and I've yet to see an STI, mainly classics, get within 30 yards of my car when I'm up to the legal limit.
who are you trying to convince?? my mrs has a wrx mapped to nearly 280bhp and my sti will destroy it on road and drag strip, we even have a video.

5 runs at pod guess the result

5-0 to the sti
Old 24 November 2013, 09:41 PM
  #165  
Kwik
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Kwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gone Dark
Posts: 6,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
who are you trying to convince?? my mrs has a wrx mapped to nearly 280bhp and my sti will destroy it on road and drag strip, we even have a video.

5 runs at pod guess the result

5-0 to the sti
But you run a front mount and had yours mapped at RCM didnt you?.
Old 24 November 2013, 09:44 PM
  #166  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Kwik
But you run a front mount and had yours mapped at RCM didnt you?.
yes but emma also has had hers mapped at rcm by the same mapper and runs launch control.
Old 24 November 2013, 09:45 PM
  #167  
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Standing Up
Posts: 16,742
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
who are you trying to convince?? my mrs has a wrx mapped to nearly 280bhp and my sti will destroy it on road and drag strip, we even have a video.

5 runs at pod guess the result

5-0 to the sti
My mapped PPP WRX was 270/272 and while it was awesome and I could drive it pretty well it was slow compared to my Spec D, STi Wagon and GC8 WRX lol Comparing it to my current RA Spec C would just be silly
Old 24 November 2013, 09:46 PM
  #168  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pflowers
I think I am right in saying the STI wont reach 60 in second gear whereas the WRX will so that's why the WRX is quicker on paper due to one less gear change?
My WRX would keep up with any car to 60-70ish but as soon as you hit 3rd it feels like you've parked up.

I had a blast from the lights with a classic STI once and I was gone, must have been a 60 foot lead within seconds, then all of a sudden I approached 3rd, it felt like slow motion and I could actually hear his Turbo spool up from quite a distance behind. I presume after a casual launch his 2nd gear was coming to life, it must have been huge but deadly laggy. He was certainly coming, but luckily the road ran out.
Old 24 November 2013, 09:47 PM
  #169  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 53
My mapped PPP WRX was 270/272 and while it was awesome and I could drive it pretty well it was slow compared to my Spec D, STi Wagon and GC8 WRX lol Comparing it to my current RA Spec C would just be silly
thats the comedy point here, even at the same power the sti is still faster.

the longer gearing to get to 60 in 2 gears rather then three mean nothing in the real world.
Old 24 November 2013, 09:47 PM
  #170  
bustaMOVEs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
bustaMOVEs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The 2dr club
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
yes but emma also has had hers mapped at rcm by the same mapper and runs launch control.
Yes but Emma can't drive for **** and just crashes at roundabouts
Old 24 November 2013, 09:49 PM
  #171  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 53
My mapped PPP WRX was 270/272 and while it was awesome and I could drive it pretty well it was slow compared to my Spec D, STi Wagon and GC8 WRX lol Comparing it to my current RA Spec C would just be silly
It'll feel slower because of the long ratios and it's heavier. Trust me it'll hurtle to 60 if you are brave with the revs and change smooth into 2nd.

Forget 3rd, just slam on and make like you've proved your point!!!
Old 24 November 2013, 09:49 PM
  #172  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bustaMOVEs
Yes but Emma can't drive for **** and just crashes at roundabouts
this is true but luckily there are none of those at santa pod
Old 24 November 2013, 09:51 PM
  #173  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
It'll feel slower because of the long ratios and it's heavier. Trust me it'll hurtle to 60 if you are brave with the revs and change smooth into 2nd.

Forget 3rd, just slam on and make like you've proved your point!!!
yeh what do you know, wasting all that money on those stis and spec cs you have.

should of just bought a wrx.
Old 24 November 2013, 09:51 PM
  #174  
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Standing Up
Posts: 16,742
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
thats the comedy point here, even at the same power the sti is still faster.

the longer gearing to get to 60 in 2 gears rather then three mean nothing in the real world.
Indeed, peak power is pretty uninteresting, it's what's beneath the VF35's map curve that is going to be of far more interest than that under the TD04's
Old 24 November 2013, 09:53 PM
  #175  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
thats the comedy point here, even at the same power the sti is still faster.

the longer gearing to get to 60 in 2 gears rather then three mean nothing in the real world.
On the short country roads around Wakey it's everything, there's nothing could escape Billy unless it was a rare 3rd gear straight.

Jesus I just left it in 2nd racing a 380bhp Evo 5 for 5 miles, I was never off the boost! That's also when I discovered a strange smell.
Old 24 November 2013, 09:57 PM
  #176  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tubbytommy
yeh what do you know, wasting all that money on those stis and spec cs you have.

should of just bought a wrx.
When I nearly hit the back of an RS4 through rapid 2nd gear acceleration SPEC C nearly came into my head quicker than what the airbag would have.
Old 24 November 2013, 09:57 PM
  #177  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
On the short country roads around Wakey it's everything, there's nothing could escape Billy unless it was a rare 3rd gear straight.

Jesus I just left it in 2nd racing a 380bhp Evo 5 for 5 miles, I was never off the boost! That's also when I discovered a strange smell.
sorry i was talking facts i didnt realise we were discussing your fast and furious dreams.


i like many above have had a wrx and know what they are like in fact my mrs still has a tuned one, the sti will beat it hands down i suggest you try one.
Old 24 November 2013, 09:58 PM
  #178  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Seriously though when I first got the WRX I thought it was very slow, I was launching at 3k and changing at 6k. Everything spanked me, in a last desperate bid I launched against an STI at 5k and changed at 7,200 and it was a revelation.

Then you know what came?
Old 24 November 2013, 10:02 PM
  #179  
jayallen
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
jayallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Fabulist Hunter
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
Seriously though when I first got the WRX I thought it was very slow, I was launching at 3k and changing at 6k. Everything spanked me, in a last desperate bid I launched against an STI at 5k and changed at 7,200 and it was a revelation.

Then you know what came?
Your mum woke you up for school?
Old 24 November 2013, 10:03 PM
  #180  
53
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (41)
 
53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Standing Up
Posts: 16,742
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Wakefield Liberty City



Quick Reply: WRX vs STI



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:15 PM.