Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Mitchell-gate...now £1/3 million.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05 November 2013, 04:15 PM
  #31  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Miniman
But Martin only trolls F1's posts. F1 tries it on with everyone (with an attitude attached).

On balance I'd rather F1 fecked off as it would make NSR a much nicer place to debate stuff.
So sorry to disappoint you, been here since 1999 so I don't think I'll be going anywhere soon You have a nice day now

Last edited by f1_fan; 05 November 2013 at 04:16 PM.
Old 05 November 2013, 04:15 PM
  #32  
Worlasshasansti
Scooby Regular
 
Worlasshasansti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Newcastle upon tyne
Posts: 1,100
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Countries a joke I would just keep throwing money at it regardless, politicians seem to do **** all for us using any common sense and police aren't allowed to do anything as the government don't let let them, **** the both of em I say

Mick
Old 05 November 2013, 04:17 PM
  #33  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
What, you think the sentence they got wasn't derisory? And FAR less than you or I would have got? FAR less than I've seen given for speeding?

And anyway, what does Huhne have to do with this debate?
Nothing at all.

I was just pointing out that your track record on judging these situations isn't exactly 100%

btw - an awful lot of people at the time thought his punishment was far more than 'you or I' could expect


Chris Huhne and Vicky Pryce's crimes do not fit the heavy punishment
Old 05 November 2013, 05:35 PM
  #34  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan


That is your opinion and it is just that, an opinion not a fact!


You may try looking in the mirror next time you say that
Old 05 November 2013, 05:44 PM
  #35  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
You may try looking in the mirror next time you say that
Why? Do I need the view of an ugly **** whilst I say it?
Old 05 November 2013, 06:26 PM
  #36  
Mouser
Scooby Regular
 
Mouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Why? Do I need the view of an ugly **** whilst I say it?
Good one!
Old 05 November 2013, 07:49 PM
  #37  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Nothing at all.

I was just pointing out that your track record on judging these situations isn't exactly 100%

btw - an awful lot of people at the time thought his punishment was far more than 'you or I' could expect


Chris Huhne and Vicky Pryce's crimes do not fit the heavy punishment
I don't doubt that some people thought the punishment was over the top, but when someone can get a year's imprisonment for thinking about setting fire to a speed camera, and when someone can get a year inside for speeding, and THEN lose his lifelong job as well...now THOSE are a bit harsh.

You or I would have gone to prison for longer than the Huhnes, stayed in longer and you know it.

Oh, and I did admit to being wrong at the time, so
Old 05 November 2013, 09:25 PM
  #38  
toneh
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
toneh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Yes I am absolutely suggesting the case be dropped.

1) It is not a huge issue to most people, just people like you. It happens every day with police, politicians and media to normal everyday people and just because this is one of Cameron's mates does not make it a huge isse.

2) it has been investigated TWICE already and 'the truth' cannot be found as both parties are lying and it is now one word against another. Given who it is that's involved I doubt the truth could ever be extracted even with torture as I think the truth is an alien concept to these people!

3) Aside from Cameron and a few other policitians and senior policemen who cares what was said? I care more about wasting yet more of our money flogging a dead horse.

Finally why do you believe most policticans are so honourable when just abotu everything else illustrates with facts that they are not! You are utterly deluded or maybe you are shacked up with one or something weirder!!
Totally agree with f1 on this , we know the police lie , politicians lie , I doubt the truth will come out
And even if it did , what would change ( **** all )
That aside who gives a **** when it's costing this much
For such a trivial issue that is comparable with kids in a playground
Old 05 November 2013, 09:56 PM
  #39  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar

You or I would have gone to prison for longer than the Huhnes, stayed in longer and you know it.
I disagree with your stated opinion and would be interested to hear how you have managed to come to this seemingly unequivocal opinion/conclusion.
The sentences looked pretty par for the course to me, but having said that, I am not professionally involved in the criminal justice system
Are you?
Old 05 November 2013, 11:37 PM
  #40  
Midlife......
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Midlife......'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 11,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

.........listened to the two police officers today on the news and they don't make the police look good at all.

Maybe it was sliced and diced to make it look that way.

Shaun
Old 06 November 2013, 07:35 AM
  #41  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

When the police try to "verbal" a cabinet minister and get caught out - it is never going to end up looking good for the police.
It is interesting that so many wanted to believe the story in the first instance and also that the police involved were happy to run it out. I am not sure which of the two groups I have a lower opinion of.
A rather hopeless state of affairs is it not?
Old 06 November 2013, 07:54 AM
  #42  
toneh
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
toneh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cster
When the police try to "verbal" a cabinet minister and get caught out - it is never going to end up looking good for the police.
It is interesting that so many wanted to believe the story in the first instance and also that the police involved were happy to run it out. I am not sure which of the two groups I have a lower opinion of.
A rather hopeless state of affairs is it not?
Wouldn't say hopeless , more childish and pathetic
Old 06 November 2013, 09:03 AM
  #43  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
But surely this IS now the point: no-one will be held accountable because it's down to their word against his.

And it's laughable to think that either a politician or a police officer would NOT tell lies.

Even if someone WERE found to have lied...what EXACTLY would happen?

A politician would resign as a minister and be re-appointed six months down the line after an apology.
A police officer would either get a reprimand, or be allowed to retire on full benefits.
Would you rather this sort behaviour by the Police goes unchecked? Their misconduct resulted in a senior minister resigning from the cabinet. Whether the truth comes out at this stage is irrelevent and what this inquiry will do is send out a message that all those in the Police force on all levels are publically accountable for their conduct. I do not want a Police force that thinks it can lie, cheat and conspire and be allowed get away with it. What kind of message will that send out?!
Old 06 November 2013, 09:36 AM
  #44  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
Would you rather this sort behaviour by the Police goes unchecked? Their misconduct resulted in a senior minister resigning from the cabinet. Whether the truth comes out at this stage is irrelevent and what this inquiry will do is send out a message that all those in the Police force on all levels are publically accountable for their conduct. I do not want a Police force that thinks it can lie, cheat and conspire and be allowed get away with it. What kind of message will that send out?!
So in your opinion is Mitchell completely innocent in all this?
Old 06 November 2013, 10:49 AM
  #45  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,635
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
So in your opinion is Mitchell completely innocent in all this?
No far from it, he swore at the Police, there is no denying that and Mitchell has admitted this. However, what is in question is the conduct of the Police in trying to stitch up a cabinet minister.
Old 06 November 2013, 10:57 AM
  #46  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
No far from it, he swore at the Police, there is no denying that and Mitchell has admitted this. However, what is in question is the conduct of the Police in trying to stitch up a cabinet minister.
OK that's my thinking too, but the problem is we have two sets of wrongdoers here from organisations not always known for their truth and honesty and hence I just don't think we'll ever really get to the truth of the matter.

At a time when cuts to the police were high profile maybe swearing at them wasn't such a good idea on Mitchell's part, but then embellishing the truth was even less of a good idea on the part of the police involved (whether they decided to do that off their own backs or under 'advice' from other officers)!
Old 06 November 2013, 11:32 AM
  #47  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cster
I disagree with your stated opinion and would be interested to hear how you have managed to come to this seemingly unequivocal opinion/conclusion.
The sentences looked pretty par for the course to me, but having said that, I am not professionally involved in the criminal justice system
Are you?
No, but I compared the severity of speeding with perverting the course of justice, and assumed, naively as it seems, that the latter was by FAR the more serious....

And as for going equipped for arson.....it's a joke.
Old 06 November 2013, 11:35 AM
  #48  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
Would you rather this sort behaviour by the Police goes unchecked? Their misconduct resulted in a senior minister resigning from the cabinet.
What misconduct? They still say he said it, their word against his.

Originally Posted by jonc
Whether the truth comes out at this stage is irrelevent and what this inquiry will do is send out a message that all those in the Police force on all levels are publically accountable for their conduct.
And will this do that? I don't believe it will.

Originally Posted by jonc
I do not want a Police force that thinks it can lie, cheat and conspire and be allowed get away with it.
We already HAVE that police force...have you never had any dealings with them?
Old 06 November 2013, 01:12 PM
  #49  
Bonehead
Scooby Regular
 
Bonehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

About time this was put to bed and Mitchell justs says I was wrong to swear at the officers and we agree to disagree what was actually said.
If he had not sworn at the officers there would never have been a problem. Lets reverse it and the police officers had sworn at him. Probably the sack by now. What a farce and what a disgrace this present Tory government and in particular this Home Secretary who appoints her own 'independent' advisor on Police pay and conditions as her HMIC.
The only people who do not seem to suffer from independent reviews on pay and conditions are ? YES you guessed it the pigs to the trough MPs. What a disgrace. Mitchell needs to be big enough and just apologise and move on.
Old 06 November 2013, 01:13 PM
  #50  
Bonehead
Scooby Regular
 
Bonehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
We already HAVE that police force...have you never had any dealings with them?
What a load of childish bs
Old 06 November 2013, 01:26 PM
  #51  
CrisPDuk
Scooby Regular
 
CrisPDuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Cheshire end of the emasculated Cat & Fiddle
Posts: 9,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bonehead
What a load of childish bs
You obviously don't deal with the police 'service' on a regular basis
Old 06 November 2013, 01:30 PM
  #52  
Bonehead
Scooby Regular
 
Bonehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CrisPDuk
You obviously don't deal with the police 'service' on a regular basis
Yeah I do
Old 06 November 2013, 01:53 PM
  #53  
classic Subaru Si
Scooby Regular
 
classic Subaru Si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: location, location, location
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You've been blatantly lied to by the police before? You must be a 1st.. Happened to me on several occasions over the years, friends and family too.
Old 06 November 2013, 03:51 PM
  #54  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bonehead
What a load of childish bs
Yawn...another know-nothing keyboard warrior.

I have evidence to back up my comment.
What do YOU have?
Old 06 November 2013, 06:04 PM
  #55  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Bonehead
Mitchell needs to be big enough and just apologise and move on.
He got the sack for saying something that he didn't say -
and you say he should apologise and move on.
I like your style.
Old 06 November 2013, 06:34 PM
  #56  
mrmadcap
Scooby Regular
 
mrmadcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: manchester
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
So in your opinion is Mitchell completely innocent in all this?
Yes because he should have been respected as a member of the government, if the police don't respect the government and tell lies what chance does the little man on the street have in receiving justice and fair play.

They only acted like they did because at the time their pensions were being knobbled.
Old 06 November 2013, 08:24 PM
  #57  
Bonehead
Scooby Regular
 
Bonehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
Yawn...another know-nothing keyboard warrior.

I have evidence to back up my comment.
What do YOU have?
Go on then back up your evidence, and im no no nothing keyboard warrior
Old 07 November 2013, 12:02 AM
  #58  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are you in the Police then.
Old 07 November 2013, 09:34 AM
  #59  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bonehead
Go on then back up your evidence, and im no no nothing keyboard warrior
I've been lied to, twice, lied about, once.
My son has been lied to, twice, one time the officer told him he HAD to give DNA....he didn't.

My younger son has been lied to once.

NOT mistakes, LIES, deliberate lies.

Your turn.
Old 07 November 2013, 11:07 AM
  #60  
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
neil-h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
I've been lied to, twice, lied about, once.
My son has been lied to, twice, one time the officer told him he HAD to give DNA....he didn't.

My younger son has been lied to once.

NOT mistakes, LIES, deliberate lies.

Your turn.
He kinda asked for evidence. Of the 6 occassions you've listed you've only actually given evidence of one.


Quick Reply: Mitchell-gate...now £1/3 million.....



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:45 PM.