apple's market share plummets
#31
Scooby Regular
o so the new mac can take 8 core chips then? o wait, it can only cope with 12, let me get the calculator out for you,
6 + 6 = 12
8 + 8 = 16
12 is less than 16, so it cant use the latest hardware, or did your apple tell you 8+8=12?
lmao, jack you can try to make it sound all singing all dancing as much as you want, the fact is it isn't and is behind.
6 + 6 = 12
8 + 8 = 16
12 is less than 16, so it cant use the latest hardware, or did your apple tell you 8+8=12?
lmao, jack you can try to make it sound all singing all dancing as much as you want, the fact is it isn't and is behind.
#32
It's kind of like that Rob, but only if the master is a **** and the dog makes him look a bigger one.
Tidgy, we're talking about the future, Samsung are still making iPhone chips, but they couldn't keep the contract, hopefully they'll be in better shape for 2015 and will win it back. Don't forget Samsung have been blowing a lot of cash on Marketing and not a lot on Development. I hope you enjoyed the adverts and sponsorship.
Tidgy, we're talking about the future, Samsung are still making iPhone chips, but they couldn't keep the contract, hopefully they'll be in better shape for 2015 and will win it back. Don't forget Samsung have been blowing a lot of cash on Marketing and not a lot on Development. I hope you enjoyed the adverts and sponsorship.
#33
Scooby Senior
I'm already used to it and it's great, Samsung make great chips and I still love my TV after all these years. They can't write an operating system though, so have to make do with freeware for their own devices, they should invest in making an OS rather than sponsoring the Olympics.
#34
Scooby Senior
o so the new mac can take 8 core chips then? o wait, it can only cope with 12, let me get the calculator out for you,
6 + 6 = 12
8 + 8 = 16
12 is less than 16, so it cant use the latest hardware, or did your apple tell you 8+8=12?
lmao, jack you can try to make it sound all singing all dancing as much as you want, the fact is it isn't and is behind.
6 + 6 = 12
8 + 8 = 16
12 is less than 16, so it cant use the latest hardware, or did your apple tell you 8+8=12?
lmao, jack you can try to make it sound all singing all dancing as much as you want, the fact is it isn't and is behind.
#35
Scooby Regular
The mac can't run that much ram either can it?
just because the apps you use wont jack doesn't mean others will, apple is not cutting edge tech, never has been.
Were talkin profesional apps here, not playing around at home.
#36
Scooby Senior
Cutting Edge Network Modelling, probably not, wrong market, too many neckbeards.
How does Final Cut Pro work on your network modelling machines? I'd put a bet it would take you weeks to install, then it would fall over every five minutes, what benefit are your extra numbers now?
How does Final Cut Pro work on your network modelling machines? I'd put a bet it would take you weeks to install, then it would fall over every five minutes, what benefit are your extra numbers now?
#37
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
Hi Jack
Must agree with Tidgy as you know many people rather use Adobe Premiere Pro than Final Cut,its not just home based producers etc.but mainly they're used by many professional studios,TV,Post production companies etc
Mac Pro is great machine,if its worth not sure,when you can build similar PC for lot less and will/can run MacOSX without the single issue
In professional apps I'm using PC,its tried and tested in many apps and mainly support from companies
If I would buy something what I want to use mainly at home, probably I would think get MacBook,but after owning one,not sure if I would buy again one
Jura
Must agree with Tidgy as you know many people rather use Adobe Premiere Pro than Final Cut,its not just home based producers etc.but mainly they're used by many professional studios,TV,Post production companies etc
Mac Pro is great machine,if its worth not sure,when you can build similar PC for lot less and will/can run MacOSX without the single issue
In professional apps I'm using PC,its tried and tested in many apps and mainly support from companies
If I would buy something what I want to use mainly at home, probably I would think get MacBook,but after owning one,not sure if I would buy again one
Jura
#38
Scooby Regular
Cutting Edge Network Modelling, probably not, wrong market, too many neckbeards.
How does Final Cut Pro work on your network modelling machines? I'd put a bet it would take you weeks to install, then it would fall over every five minutes, what benefit are your extra numbers now?
How does Final Cut Pro work on your network modelling machines? I'd put a bet it would take you weeks to install, then it would fall over every five minutes, what benefit are your extra numbers now?
i presume you drink water? by network modeling i mean hydraulic networks, whole citys and such, without them you'd be struggling now adays to get water to your taps.
Boils down to mac's don't start with the raw power and arn't expandable enough, no mater how you try to swing it jack, they wont do the job we need the machiens to do.
#39
Scooby Regular
Apple make products that just work. If you don't want to fiddle or don't need anything too demanding then its hard to overlook an Apple product.
If you like to "play" with tech then I wouldn't recommend Apple because their architecture is deliberately restrictive to prevent screw ups by the user.
There is a guy in work here who has Mac's at home and he swears by them. Sullies himself everyday using a windows PC. He sees it as the intellectuals choice. He also believes he isn't brainwashed by marketing hype
If you like to "play" with tech then I wouldn't recommend Apple because their architecture is deliberately restrictive to prevent screw ups by the user.
There is a guy in work here who has Mac's at home and he swears by them. Sullies himself everyday using a windows PC. He sees it as the intellectuals choice. He also believes he isn't brainwashed by marketing hype
#40
Once you get into the 'workstation' market, then all the major manufacturers in that market make systems that 'just work'.
Apple are no different to any other manufacturer in that market, and indeed are usually bypassed unless there is a specific Mac-only requirement. The new Mac Pro is only attractive if you have such a requirement - as a general workstation it is easily outclassed by other systems.
Apple are no different to any other manufacturer in that market, and indeed are usually bypassed unless there is a specific Mac-only requirement. The new Mac Pro is only attractive if you have such a requirement - as a general workstation it is easily outclassed by other systems.
#41
Scooby Senior
The Mac Pro is squarely aimed at people who run Apple software. Let's say I get a new job, if I see a Mac Pro I can crack on, now you could build me a PC that will help me do my job but you'd be spending more in labour than the savings you've made by using DIY.
Apple are very different to any other manufacturer, they produce the hardware to run their software, that's unique and envied.
Saying that the Mac Pro is **** because it has a few lower number in a couple of places is laughable.
Apple are very different to any other manufacturer, they produce the hardware to run their software, that's unique and envied.
Saying that the Mac Pro is **** because it has a few lower number in a couple of places is laughable.
#42
Scooby Regular
#43
Scooby Senior
#44
The Mac Pro is squarely aimed at people who run Apple software. Let's say I get a new job, if I see a Mac Pro I can crack on, now you could build me a PC that will help me do my job but you'd be spending more in labour than the savings you've made by using DIY.
Apple are very different to any other manufacturer, they produce the hardware to run their software, that's unique and envied.
Saying that the Mac Pro is **** because it has a few lower number in a couple of places is laughable.
Apple are very different to any other manufacturer, they produce the hardware to run their software, that's unique and envied.
Saying that the Mac Pro is **** because it has a few lower number in a couple of places is laughable.
#46
Which is basically exactly what I said.
Simply not true I'm afraid - 'proper' workstations will come working out the box from the supplier. You might have to install and activate application software, but that is no different to a Mac.
Don't make the mistake of assuming all workstations are running Windows - they may well be running Linux or Unix, depending on the use case.
It's certainly not unique (Sun/Oracle and Solaris comes immediately to mind), and in terms of 'envy' it's a double-edged sword when you start making hardware elements proprietary, as it makes it far more difficult for a company to produce a hardware product that would work cross-platform; something like a capture card, or a GPGPU like the Tesla cards as examples.
It comes back to what we have already agreed on - a Mac Pro is only appealing to someone who specifically needs to run in an OSX environment. As soon as that absolute requirement dissipates (software available on other platform for example) then the Mac Pro no longer makes any sense other than a pure aesthetic choice. Not that there're anything wrong with that.
I never said it was ****, I said it was outclassed, and not by a 'few lower numbers'. I can supply you a 4-socket workstation with up to 40 cores and GPGPUs that will sit under your desk. Yes, it will be a 'boring' black box, and yes it will be rather louder, but you buy such a system for performance, which it has in spades.
Let's say I get a new job, if I see a Mac Pro I can crack on, now you could build me a PC that will help me do my job but you'd be spending more in labour than the savings you've made by using DIY.
Don't make the mistake of assuming all workstations are running Windows - they may well be running Linux or Unix, depending on the use case.
Apple are very different to any other manufacturer, they produce the hardware to run their software, that's unique and envied.
It comes back to what we have already agreed on - a Mac Pro is only appealing to someone who specifically needs to run in an OSX environment. As soon as that absolute requirement dissipates (software available on other platform for example) then the Mac Pro no longer makes any sense other than a pure aesthetic choice. Not that there're anything wrong with that.
Saying that the Mac Pro is **** because it has a few lower number in a couple of places is laughable.
#47
Scooby Senior
I doubt anyone will be buying it to run anything other than OSX so comparing it to a 40 core Windows workstation is a waste of time. As big a waste of time as saying the Mac Pro is outdated because it has however many less of whatever, which brought us here. Hopefully Tidgy has learnt something.
#49
Scooby Senior
Of course they're not, but if you want a PC - and that's what we're talking about here - then you have Windows, Linux and OSX unless you want to be picky.
#51
Scooby Regular
The Mac Pro is squarely aimed at people who run Apple software. Let's say I get a new job, if I see a Mac Pro I can crack on, now you could build me a PC that will help me do my job but you'd be spending more in labour than the savings you've made by using DIY.
Apple are very different to any other manufacturer, they produce the hardware to run their software, that's unique and envied.
Saying that the Mac Pro is **** because it has a few lower number in a couple of places is laughable.
Apple are very different to any other manufacturer, they produce the hardware to run their software, that's unique and envied.
Saying that the Mac Pro is **** because it has a few lower number in a couple of places is laughable.
wow you changed your tune quickly, you were syaing it was all singing all dancing, now your saying its a big improvment over existing mac, yet not as good as a pc can be speced up to?
#52
Scooby Senior
#53
Scooby Senior
"You really have no idea what you're talking about. Which Mac Pro is more up to date than the unreleased Mac Pro? Please don't reply with a Windows or Linux PC, I couldn't take that much laughter on such a hot day."
In response to you stating that the unreleased Mac Pro was out of date.
Same tune.
#54
Scooby Regular
#56
Scooby Regular
Not true. Here's my original response
"You really have no idea what you're talking about. Which Mac Pro is more up to date than the unreleased Mac Pro? Please don't reply with a Windows or Linux PC, I couldn't take that much laughter on such a hot day."
In response to you stating that the unreleased Mac Pro was out of date.
Same tune.
"You really have no idea what you're talking about. Which Mac Pro is more up to date than the unreleased Mac Pro? Please don't reply with a Windows or Linux PC, I couldn't take that much laughter on such a hot day."
In response to you stating that the unreleased Mac Pro was out of date.
Same tune.
the bold underlined comment you quoted is the important bit lol way to shoot yourself in the foot jack.
So how long a day do you spend learning apple marketing BS, is it a 4 hour a day job?
#57
If you want "workstation class" performance and scalability then you go with Windows or Linux/Unix. The Mac Pro, whilst it looks nice and actually has quite an innovative construction, but ask any professional what they want out of a workstation, it looking nice and small will only be a minor consideration if at all for something that spends most of it's life under a desk or in a cabinet. Ultimately it is restricted by it's design.
Last edited by jonc; 18 July 2013 at 01:17 PM.
#58
Scooby Senior
OK Jon, what do you suggest as I need a new desktop, an old Mac Pro as it looks like a PC box? I can't do my job without OSX and according to Tidgy there's better out there, what are my options?
#60
Scooby Senior