Hammas leader


Not quick enough with the edit!
riginally Posted by k9l3 View Post
funny you all laughing at me seen as i am not welsh because i am from london so who is the stupid not mentioning no names banni the fanni. i heard muslims like donkeys is that right . you should know
Last edited by banny sti; Nov 21, 2012 at 02:29 PM.
that is what i said and i were stating something that was true welsh like sheep muslims like donkeys
Last edited by k9l3; Nov 21, 2012 at 02:35 PM.
Tehran does nothing and we all go on as usual?
Iran wouldn't even have to respond immediately. A simple blockage of the Straits of Homuz and the fear of Iran's potental response or that of it's proxies would:
- send the markets into freefall
- send the cost of a barrel of oil spiralling 2 or 3 times overnight.
Within 6-10 days the UK would be close to standstill (like the tanker driver's strike but this time months to recover as stockpiling would be world-wide).
Next I'd expect Tehran to do a deal with North Korea (if it hasn't already) on a device smuggled into the USA in components to put be put together over there by agents already in place. Remember Tehran's been planning too ....
We'd move from here to nightmare in 24 hours.
Tell me how your scenario plays out.
I mean come on, you would wouldn't you?
http://api.ning.com/files/1FgbTLUe5o...180&height=261
Last edited by Shaid; Nov 21, 2012 at 02:38 PM.
Okay i'll be honest with you. It is true. We do like Donkeys.
I mean come on, you would wouldn't you?
http://api.ning.com/files/1FgbTLUe5o...180&height=261
I mean come on, you would wouldn't you?
http://api.ning.com/files/1FgbTLUe5o...180&height=261
Okay i'll be honest with you. It is true. We do like Donkeys.
I mean come on, you would wouldn't you?
http://api.ning.com/files/1FgbTLUe5o...180&height=261
I mean come on, you would wouldn't you?
http://api.ning.com/files/1FgbTLUe5o...180&height=261
its silly putting a post up regarding this as it just makes people dispute . the world should come together but i doubt it ever could. i think we should ban religion 1st make everyone the same and that be start . or we can just use water pistols
Race? .... naa ignore that too
I know maybe we'll fight over coffee? ...... naaa thats done too
Don’t see why I should come with you when I can still come when I like (though I've heard it’s easier with a sheep! )
And now I’ve got the blue pills I don’t need to use a water pistol filled with milk anymore (though Mrs SouthWalesSam says she preferred the taste of the milk!
And now I’ve got the blue pills I don’t need to use a water pistol filled with milk anymore (though Mrs SouthWalesSam says she preferred the taste of the milk!
Israel attacks Iran and then ...?
Tehran does nothing and we all go on as usual?
Iran wouldn't even have to respond immediately. A simple blockage of the Straits of Homuz and the fear of Iran's potental response or that of it's proxies would:
- send the markets into freefall
- send the cost of a barrel of oil spiralling 2 or 3 times overnight.
Within 6-10 days the UK would be close to standstill (like the tanker driver's strike but this time months to recover as stockpiling would be world-wide).
Next I'd expect Tehran to do a deal with North Korea (if it hasn't already) on a device smuggled into the USA in components to put be put together over there by agents already in place. Remember Tehran's been planning too ....
We'd move from here to nightmare in 24 hours.
Tell me how your scenario plays out.
Tehran does nothing and we all go on as usual?
Iran wouldn't even have to respond immediately. A simple blockage of the Straits of Homuz and the fear of Iran's potental response or that of it's proxies would:
- send the markets into freefall
- send the cost of a barrel of oil spiralling 2 or 3 times overnight.
Within 6-10 days the UK would be close to standstill (like the tanker driver's strike but this time months to recover as stockpiling would be world-wide).
Next I'd expect Tehran to do a deal with North Korea (if it hasn't already) on a device smuggled into the USA in components to put be put together over there by agents already in place. Remember Tehran's been planning too ....
We'd move from here to nightmare in 24 hours.
Tell me how your scenario plays out.
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 19,156
Likes: 15
From: To the valley men!
Israel attacks Iran and then ...?
Tehran does nothing and we all go on as usual?
Iran wouldn't even have to respond immediately. A simple blockage of the Straits of Homuz and the fear of Iran's potental response or that of it's proxies would:
- send the markets into freefall
- send the cost of a barrel of oil spiralling 2 or 3 times overnight.
Within 6-10 days the UK would be close to standstill (like the tanker driver's strike but this time months to recover as stockpiling would be world-wide).
Next I'd expect Tehran to do a deal with North Korea (if it hasn't already) on a device smuggled into the USA in components to put be put together over there by agents already in place. Remember Tehran's been planning too ....
We'd move from here to nightmare in 24 hours.
Tell me how your scenario plays out.
Tehran does nothing and we all go on as usual?
Iran wouldn't even have to respond immediately. A simple blockage of the Straits of Homuz and the fear of Iran's potental response or that of it's proxies would:
- send the markets into freefall
- send the cost of a barrel of oil spiralling 2 or 3 times overnight.
Within 6-10 days the UK would be close to standstill (like the tanker driver's strike but this time months to recover as stockpiling would be world-wide).
Next I'd expect Tehran to do a deal with North Korea (if it hasn't already) on a device smuggled into the USA in components to put be put together over there by agents already in place. Remember Tehran's been planning too ....
We'd move from here to nightmare in 24 hours.
Tell me how your scenario plays out.
If Isreal/West cuts off the snakes head (the governmanet of Iran with a strategic strike) using Mossad who would know?
Sail around the Cape instead of going through Straits of Hormuz, longer but not a game stopper, how did we manage when Iran and Iraq where at it like ten men? They know better than to block it as they would be ham strung themselves, sanctions are biting and hurting them.
Or pump Scotland dry before they get independence.
North Korea are on their knees and will rattle their sabre's at the South but not anything bigger. Rhetoric and failed missle launches are proof.
The other Arab nations around the Gulf know which side their bread is buttered and will back any threat to them poised by Iran.
Then again, peace could break out and everyone will hug and kiss
.
Last edited by eggy790; Nov 21, 2012 at 03:43 PM.
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 19,156
Likes: 15
From: To the valley men!
I can see Isreal is losing ground in the sympathy stakes but the likes of the Huffington, well.
I know they bombed a facility in Iraq, but I don't believe they have ever attacked Iran (unless you are referring to some sort of cyber attack?)
Correct me if I'm wrong of course
Last edited by Martin2005; Nov 21, 2012 at 04:22 PM.
@Trooper_1815
"Cut off the snake's head", Mossad to the rescue, "pump Scotland dry".
What's your regular read? Boy's Own?
And North Sea oil is light, sweet crude. it's not used to make diesel.
I'm not aware of any previous attack by Israel on Iran, though Israel did launch an attack on Saddam's Iraq back in the mid 80's. It didn't announce it in advance, it just got on with it. Unlike back then, Iran is better armed, had time to get ready and it's facilities are deeper underground. It's proxy network of jihadists is well funded and better deployed for retaliation.
Poor as it is North Korea is one of the world's biggest trader is illlicit arms.
And you underestimate the attraction of an 'Arab bomb' in a Middle & Far East that thinks the West has pushed it around for too long. Iran would have strong support if it sold itself as the nuke-holding Guardian and Protector of the 1.3 billion strong nation of Islam.
In any case, Iran wouldn't even need a real bomb. In the immediate heightened tension 2 or 3 of its proxy groups could simplely announce their suicide squads have planted large devices in 3 US cities on a 24 hour delay. The effect on the US economy would be like the recent hurricane but larger and wider panic as everyone grabs their supplies and guns and point their 4x4s off into the desert.
I've never read any Fredrick Forsyth. I only read non-fiction.
I am analyst and a contrarian. I talk, I listen, I watch and I read. And I try to get behind the headlines and the posturing and I try to think through what I'd do if it were me in that position.
"Cut off the snake's head", Mossad to the rescue, "pump Scotland dry".
What's your regular read? Boy's Own?
And North Sea oil is light, sweet crude. it's not used to make diesel.
I'm not aware of any previous attack by Israel on Iran, though Israel did launch an attack on Saddam's Iraq back in the mid 80's. It didn't announce it in advance, it just got on with it. Unlike back then, Iran is better armed, had time to get ready and it's facilities are deeper underground. It's proxy network of jihadists is well funded and better deployed for retaliation.
Poor as it is North Korea is one of the world's biggest trader is illlicit arms.
And you underestimate the attraction of an 'Arab bomb' in a Middle & Far East that thinks the West has pushed it around for too long. Iran would have strong support if it sold itself as the nuke-holding Guardian and Protector of the 1.3 billion strong nation of Islam.
In any case, Iran wouldn't even need a real bomb. In the immediate heightened tension 2 or 3 of its proxy groups could simplely announce their suicide squads have planted large devices in 3 US cities on a 24 hour delay. The effect on the US economy would be like the recent hurricane but larger and wider panic as everyone grabs their supplies and guns and point their 4x4s off into the desert.
I've never read any Fredrick Forsyth. I only read non-fiction.
I am analyst and a contrarian. I talk, I listen, I watch and I read. And I try to get behind the headlines and the posturing and I try to think through what I'd do if it were me in that position.
@JTaylor
No. I'm not, but there's really not a lot we can do about it.
But we can try and drag Netanyahu to the negotiating table to settle this festering sore of a 60-year dispute and allow a two state solution.
Our (the West's) failure to do this ramps up tension in the region, breeds hatred, ruins our daily lives on tube and bus and at the airport and gives the likes of Armedinajhad and the fundamentalist, controlling mullahs the credibility they clearly lack with their own people.
No. I'm not, but there's really not a lot we can do about it.

But we can try and drag Netanyahu to the negotiating table to settle this festering sore of a 60-year dispute and allow a two state solution.
Our (the West's) failure to do this ramps up tension in the region, breeds hatred, ruins our daily lives on tube and bus and at the airport and gives the likes of Armedinajhad and the fundamentalist, controlling mullahs the credibility they clearly lack with their own people.
@JTaylor
No. I'm not, but there's really not a lot we can do about it.
But we can try and drag Netanyahu to the negotiating table to settle this festering sore of a 60-year dispute and allow a two state solution.
Our (the West's) failure to do this ramps up tension in the region, breeds hatred, ruins our daily lives on tube and bus and at the airport and gives the likes of Armedinajhad and the fundamentalist, controlling mullahs the credibility they clearly lack with their own people.
No. I'm not, but there's really not a lot we can do about it.

But we can try and drag Netanyahu to the negotiating table to settle this festering sore of a 60-year dispute and allow a two state solution.
Our (the West's) failure to do this ramps up tension in the region, breeds hatred, ruins our daily lives on tube and bus and at the airport and gives the likes of Armedinajhad and the fundamentalist, controlling mullahs the credibility they clearly lack with their own people.
That is what they believe now, but they will change once a political path is finally found.
Let's not forget that Sinn Fein were dead set against power sharing, but today they share power with their former deadly enemies.
Let's not forget that Sinn Fein were dead set against power sharing, but today they share power with their former deadly enemies.
@JTaylor
Like Shaid says you have to talk to Hamas. They are the elected government in Gaza. And Fatah as well.
People don't want to talk to Hamas because:
"it's their stated AIM to wipe out the state of Israel and push the Israelis into the sea."
Yet they are happy to shake hands with Israel who have wiped out the state of Palestine (it's on the map of the Holy (?) Land in my KJV Bible printed in the 1940s but it ain't there now).
And in building it's southern buffer zone / no man's land Israel has driven 1.8 million Palestinians into a 6 mile wide strip on the edge the sea.
Many on on here keep pointing out that Hamas has talked about doing it but don't seem to have noticed that Israel have actually done it.
And why would Netanyahu consider a two state solution when a real Palestine state could have it's own army and weapons and Israel would lose its carefully consructed wide buffer zones of a neutered Lebanon to the North, an unarmed, chaotic West Bank to the East and the hell hole that's Gaza to the South?
Like Shaid says you have to talk to Hamas. They are the elected government in Gaza. And Fatah as well.
People don't want to talk to Hamas because:
"it's their stated AIM to wipe out the state of Israel and push the Israelis into the sea."
Yet they are happy to shake hands with Israel who have wiped out the state of Palestine (it's on the map of the Holy (?) Land in my KJV Bible printed in the 1940s but it ain't there now).
And in building it's southern buffer zone / no man's land Israel has driven 1.8 million Palestinians into a 6 mile wide strip on the edge the sea.
Many on on here keep pointing out that Hamas has talked about doing it but don't seem to have noticed that Israel have actually done it.
And why would Netanyahu consider a two state solution when a real Palestine state could have it's own army and weapons and Israel would lose its carefully consructed wide buffer zones of a neutered Lebanon to the North, an unarmed, chaotic West Bank to the East and the hell hole that's Gaza to the South?









