9/12 Apple Day

Apple were very late to adopting USB, haven't adopted USB3 and gone with Thunderbolt now.
I would suggest they had zero to little influence on the adoption of USB.
(To be fair, FireWire was quick, easy, chainable, but stupid expensive).
Do Apple have the majority share in computer sales currently? No, but do the ideas they pioneer permeate through the rest of the industry? Yes.

So now you're backtracking to say it was only manufacturers of Mac peripherals? Well why didn't you say so in the first place.
If a Retina 30", 27" or 21.5" display ever happens, it'll be necessary. Otherwise it's a white elephant. But the design is supremely elegant. Probably the last such design from Apple now the accountants are in charge.
Dropping the 3 1/4" floppy was also something Apple led the way with and which was also a good idea - by that stage their capacity was woefully inadequate to be of any practical use. Again, this was something other manufacturers adopted soon afterwards. Sure, you could of course build/specify a PC without a floppy drive, but at the time, most people didn't even though they probably never used it.
Apple have now dropped the CD/DVD drive from their latest gen MacBook Pros and Mac Minis. Of course, netbooks have never had them so whilst Apple might not be the first to do this, I believe they the first to drop it from one of their flagship products and I'm sure other manufacturers will follow suit.
I didn't say Apple forced all manufacturers to make nothing but USB devices - the only manufacturers that would have been "forced" down the USB peripheral path would have been those that only made Mac specific products.
One thing is for sure though, which is that after Apple made the shift to a USB only product, other manufacturers followed suit because it was a good idea for users as well as device and peripheral manufacturers.
I'm also not saying that Apple products are the be all and end all - some stuff I like, some stuff I don't. The last little discussion on this thread was in response to someone saying that Steve Jobs' influence hadn't affected them. Whereas I happen to think it probably has and used USB as an example of where Jobs/Apple's influence possibly had had an impact upon them.
In hindsight, USB may not have been the best example I could have chosen but what I was attempting to illustrate was that, as with many things, Apple did something that others then followed suit with (again, I'm referring to switching to only USB, rather than USB itself).
Now of course, Apple may well be in a better position to be able to do this because the psuedo-religious following surrounding their products allows them to take more of a risk than another manufacturer like Dell or HP. After all, if you use OSX, you only have one choice of hardware manufacturer (excluding hackingtoshes). Whereas if you use Windows or Linux, you can easily replace your Dell with an HP and still have broadly the same user experience.
Whether you are an Apple fan or not, it's hard to argue that they have not been massive technology innovators. Whether that remains the case, we shall see, but without Jobs, I think they will find it a lot harder.
Anyway, this has all turned a bit serious and I'm probably guilty of taking the bait, but I've had a couple of beers at the end of the week and I'm feeling a touch loquacious (yes, I know, I'm sad and I'm wasting my life
) so if anyone is still up and reading this carp, I suggest you have a beer too and move on to discussing more important topics No. You are confusing external, chainable, manageable and Raidable hard disk storage with Thunderbolt. It's a totally different kettle of fish. Thunderbolt is designed to be a high bandwidth, function agnostic interconnect. It'll fail outside Apple Pro users due to cost.
If a Retina 30", 27" or 21.5" display ever happens, it'll be necessary. Otherwise it's a white elephant. But the design is supremely elegant. Probably the last such design from Apple now the accountants are in charge.
If a Retina 30", 27" or 21.5" display ever happens, it'll be necessary. Otherwise it's a white elephant. But the design is supremely elegant. Probably the last such design from Apple now the accountants are in charge.
Last edited by Gigsy; Oct 6, 2012 at 01:17 AM.
You have this wrong too. It wasn't until the introduction of the iMac that they went with USB as a majority (but still included FW400 or 800). A good two years (ish) after the majority of Wintel boxes went that way. I.e. late to the USB party.
The Wright Brothers put an engine on an already working glider, I can think of better examples than that.
The point is that the Windows machines had a host of other connections on them too. The iMac just had USB. You seem to have missed that in what I said.
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Which is completely meaningless, if iMac's only represented a tiny percentage of total computer sales at the time, as they did.
Apple have acknowledged the purple halo that afflicts the iPhone 5, basically become a better photographer. 
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4436

http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4436
Apple have acknowledged the purple halo that afflicts the iPhone 5, basically become a better photographer. 
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4436

http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4436







