Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Sc42 or Md321t?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 08:41 AM
  #31  
stevep360's Avatar
stevep360
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
From: Northumberland
Default

My sc46 is mental on the standard 2.0 l block. So god knows what it will be like on a 2.1.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 09:03 AM
  #32  
scoobyken's Avatar
scoobyken
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

Isn't that gona be laggy Steve?
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 11:02 AM
  #33  
JohnD's Avatar
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 1
From: Havering, Essex
Default

I've been considering further changes on my STi Currently using an MD321H, GT spec headers with Harvey's up-pipe, 650 inj., Hyperflow CAI, full 3" Milltek system but still retaining the top mount IC It's nudging 400 with 365lbft It spools quite well an pulls from around 3300.
I would consider an SC46 billet and go to front mount IC but would be reluctant to loose the spooling characteristics I've got. A good road car is one that pulls from way down but we know this not available with these turbo cars and adjust driving style to compensate, but there comes a point where it simply becomes a chore having to keep the revs way up to make the whole lot work on the public road!
Who is using the SC46 on a 2ltr and what are the spool characteristics like?

JohnD
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 11:46 AM
  #34  
specialx's Avatar
specialx
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,313
Likes: 0
From: WWW.SCOOBYCLINIC.COM
Default

Originally Posted by stevie1982
Ads read the first 10 words in my orginal post ;-)

The OP was asking about a 450+ turbo hence why I said the 321t would suit his needs as the sc42 won't make that power on pump fuel as its a 420bhp turbo ;-) also stated that a non billet turbo would take some time to get going on a standard 2.0 as TX said 4500rpm and that to forget about the bhp target and your sc42 would have better spool and be better suited for his needs.
Doh!!! lol Sorry Dude!!!
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 12:09 PM
  #35  
Anger's Avatar
Anger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 30
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by jura11
New Billet T is suited like 2.0 or 2.1,we are running 490bhp on 2.1L

Older T is laggy on 2.0L,but new spools nicely as said on 2.0L or 2.1L


Jura
But the T spools better than a 20g....it isn't that laggy at all as Simon JGM will back up

Did you drive a 2.0 with a T ?
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2012 | 12:21 PM
  #36  
jura11's Avatar
jura11
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,523
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Anger
But the T spools better than a 20g....it isn't that laggy at all as Simon JGM will back up

Did you drive a 2.0 with a T ?
Yes i dove T on the 2.0L STi,still pulls well on the 2.0L,but if you are comparing to the Billet T feels laggy,tried both like normal T or Billet T,both on the 2.0L

On 2.1L i've tried only Billet T




Jura
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2012 | 03:30 PM
  #37  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

Anger;10656241]But the T spools better than a 20g....it isn't that laggy at all as Simon JGM will back up

Did you drive a 2.0 with a T ?
It rather sounds that your conclusion is based on a cheapo Chinese copy TD05-20G.
My experience, all based on 2 litres on road petrol is that the SC42 will outspool an MD321T but the 321T will have greater headline bhp.
Also compare the prices. I am not sure a comparison with an SC42 and MD321 is particularly relevant. 420 bhp turbo against 450 plus turbo.
I have a hybrid 20G on one of my Subaru Wagons on road fuel. 1 bar in 4th at 3160 rpm which I think is good and last rolling road was 422 bhp. Some 20Gs are head and shoulders above others.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2012 | 03:42 PM
  #38  
jura11's Avatar
jura11
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,523
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by harvey
It rather sounds that your conclusion is based on a cheapo Chinese copy TD05-20G.
My experience, all based on 2 litres on road petrol is that the SC42 will outspool an MD321T but the 321T will have greater headline bhp.
Also compare the prices. I am not sure a comparison with an SC42 and MD321 is particularly relevant. 420 bhp turbo against 450 plus turbo.
I have a hybrid 20G on one of my Subaru Wagons on road fuel. 1 bar in 4th at 3160 rpm which I think is good and last rolling road was 422 bhp. Some 20Gs are head and shoulders above others.
SC42 can outspool MD321T,but if you comparing to the billet T,not sure how this compare,i know from mine experience billet T works amazingly.Comparing non billet turbo to billet is in my view little bit unfair.

More relevant will be test of the SC46 vs MD321T both are billet,both are 450bhp turbo,worth to do back to back tests

Second thing worth to do test both turbo with your Up pipe like on ported headers and GT spec


Jura
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2012 | 03:53 PM
  #39  
Infected by sti's Avatar
Infected by sti
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,221
Likes: 0
From: Cardiff
Default

If some one buys my SC42 I may just get an LM420 or 450 and put this issue to bed.


Is this for sale?

Cheers!
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 10:19 AM
  #40  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

I am referring to an MD321T. Billet.

Second thing worth to do test both turbo with your Up pipe like on ported headers and GT spec
I am prepared to do this but over 400 bhp the ported headers and matched uppipe have generally lost the edge to GT2 tubular headers and my trick uppipe. Unfortunately the GT2 supplied uppipe greatly slugs spool and responsiveness.

At 450 bhp or thereabouts there is absolutely no point testing my ported headers and matched uppipe against my GT2 Spec tubular headers with 3 bolt trick uppipe. The tubular hedaers and trick uppipe will have it every time. Subject to the turbo, at around 400 bhp it is worth considering moving from ported headers and matched uppipe to tubular GT2 Spec and trick uppipe. The GT2 tubular headers and trick uppipe come at a cost however.
These figures are not set in stone as it depends on the turbo and the rest of the spec.
What would be very interesting would be testing an SC42 and MD321T with tubular GT Spec headers and uppipe as supplied against tubular GT 2 Spec headers fitted with my trick uppipe. This would demonstrate the outstanding gains to be had from the trick uppipe. I am quite happy to provide a trick uppipe for these tests providing they are carried out on a well controlled rolling road and the same rolling road is used on all tests. Subject to what we are doing we also have fitting facilities here in Darlington to fit the uppipe(s).
As all of the trick uppipe users that previously ran the GT Spec uppipe can tell you, the improvements in spool, crispness and torque are quite remarkable so much so that I now do a trick 2 bolt uppipe purely for use on GT1 Spec 2 bolt flange header sets that are no longer produced but there are many of them in service, particularly on older cars.
Do not confuse the trick 2 bolt and 3 bolt for use on GT Spec and GT2 Spec tubular headers with the purpose designed uppipes (2 bolt) to replace the OE uppipe where standard Subaru headers are in use or supplied with ported headers and matched uppipe.

Note that once the trick uppipe, 2 bolt or 3 bolt is fitted a remap is required because it makes such a big difference that you need fuel in the map that much earlier as earlier spool is promoted.

Last edited by harvey; Jun 10, 2012 at 10:21 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 10:39 AM
  #41  
Infected by sti's Avatar
Infected by sti
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,221
Likes: 0
From: Cardiff
Default

Hi Harvey how much would a set of gt2 spec headers and trick uppipe for 53 uk blob sti be? I am looking to upgrade my turbo shortly tho, so is there different pipes for different turbos as I'm unsure? If so would it be best to wait untill I have purchased the turbo and go from there?

Kind regards
Craig
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 11:41 AM
  #42  
stevie1982's Avatar
stevie1982
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,023
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by specialx
Doh!!! lol Sorry Dude!!!
Haha no worries pal, I thunk the OP would he better off with one of you sc42's and scrap the idea of a certain figure and stick with a drivable road car. A 321t in my opinion would be far to laggy albeit a hoot at the too end with when it kicks in but the faster spool would make for a more fun road car.

Just my view but soo many people get carried away with wanting a car with xxx bhp when in fact a car with half of that can be more useable to an "average" driver. Very few can use all of the power at 300 let alone 450+, don't get me wrong its all very nice and puts a smile on your face but other than the straight line stuff what's the point of having a car you can't use properly.

Just my two pence worth but a well set up car with a little more power in the hands of most will be more fun to drive that one with 450+
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 12:27 PM
  #43  
JohnD's Avatar
JohnD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,252
Likes: 1
From: Havering, Essex
Default

Originally Posted by stevie1982
Just my view but soo many people get carried away with wanting a car with xxx bhp when in fact a car with half of that can be more useable to an "average" driver. Very few can use all of the power at 300 let alone 450+, don't get me wrong its all very nice and puts a smile on your face but other than the straight line stuff what's the point of having a car you can't use properly.

Just my two pence worth but a well set up car with a little more power in the hands of most will be more fun to drive that one with 450+
I posted quite recently on another "*** bhp is not enough" thread and said pretty well the same thing but also admitting that, like most others, the thought of 'a little bit more' tends to overcome all sensibility!
I VERY rarely use WOT (last time was on a rolling road!) and sometimes, after a little blast, think "that felt quite good" then check the AVC-R to find I've used a max. of 65% throttle!
It hasn't stopped me from following this thread to contemplate the next stage

JohnD
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 01:25 PM
  #44  
stevie1982's Avatar
stevie1982
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,023
Likes: 0
Default

i agree John its noice to have the power, my last classic was running 480bhp and was a cracking car but as you say i probably used a simialr % of the throttle in most occasissions all though it was a fun % lol

look at the times set at the Ring by Lichfield in the type 20/25's and the times set at the isle of man TT course in the new impreza none of them are running huge power but are not exactly slow are they. the £1000's of pounds spent on forging etc is it really worth it

imo the sc42 will do the job !
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 04:59 PM
  #45  
ad uk's Avatar
ad uk
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 0
From: breaking 420 bhp high spec classic
Default

What's the sc46 like on a 2.0 classic without avc heads with Sti 4 heads ? I've just got one for my build it's an sc46 billet
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 05:08 PM
  #46  
prodriverules's Avatar
prodriverules
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 11,769
Likes: 1
From: C+K MOTORS
Default

Originally Posted by ad uk
What's the sc46 like on a 2.0 classic without avc heads with Sti 4 heads ? I've just got one for my build it's an sc46 billet
It will be a touch laggy if not kept up the gears but will pull hard when in boost!
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 06:25 PM
  #47  
ad uk's Avatar
ad uk
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 0
From: breaking 420 bhp high spec classic
Default

I've been told it won't be really laggy tho?
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 07:23 PM
  #48  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

GT2 Spec headers are £445. Trick uppipe currently £149. The price will be reviewed shortly. That comes DEI heat wrapped, slip jointed to reduce the possibility of cracking the headers and five new Subaru studs.
Wrapping the headers £105.
The choices between ported headers and matched uppipe all DEI heat wrapped £369 exchange or the above. There are six uppipes for ported headers or replacement OE subject to turbo and there are four uppipes for 2 bolt trick for use with GT1 header sets only and a choice of four uppipes for 3 bolt for use with GT2 header sets only. All trick uppipes are currently £149 and all matched uppipes are currently £139. All obviously heat wrapped, slip jointed and supplied with Subaru studs.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 07:34 PM
  #49  
prodriverules's Avatar
prodriverules
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 11,769
Likes: 1
From: C+K MOTORS
Default

Originally Posted by ad uk
I've been told it won't be really laggy tho?
That's why I said a touch Ad,it won't be bad but on the same hand it won't be like a vf34 or td05 for example.
Put it this way if you were travelling along in top gear at 60-65 you will need to change down a peg to get it moving in any sort of quick time instead of just putting your foot down like with the example turbos
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 07:51 PM
  #50  
scoobyken's Avatar
scoobyken
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

I did find that my current 20g was laggy like that, changing down gears to put revs up! But with the trick up pipe, I'm seeing a big improvement.. just turbo lacking the power n kick I'm after.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 07:58 PM
  #51  
ad uk's Avatar
ad uk
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 0
From: breaking 420 bhp high spec classic
Default

Originally Posted by prodriverules
That's why I said a touch Ad,it won't be bad but on the same hand it won't be like a vf34 or td05 for example.
Put it this way if you were travelling along in top gear at 60-65 you will need to change down a peg to get it moving in any sort of quick time instead of just putting your foot down like with the example turbos
Cheers bud if it's to laggy a spot of meth it is lol
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 08:17 PM
  #52  
Anger's Avatar
Anger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 30
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by harvey
It rather sounds that your conclusion is based on a cheapo Chinese copy TD05-20G.
My experience, all based on 2 litres on road petrol is that the SC42 will outspool an MD321T but the 321T will have greater headline bhp.
Also compare the prices. I am not sure a comparison with an SC42 and MD321 is particularly relevant. 420 bhp turbo against 450 plus turbo.
I have a hybrid 20G on one of my Subaru Wagons on road fuel. 1 bar in 4th at 3160 rpm which I think is good and last rolling road was 422 bhp. Some 20Gs are head and shoulders above others.
If thats what Andy F sells
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2012 | 08:21 PM
  #53  
Anger's Avatar
Anger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 30
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by stevie1982
Haha no worries pal, I thunk the OP would he better off with one of you sc42's and scrap the idea of a certain figure and stick with a drivable road car. A 321t in my opinion would be far to laggy albeit a hoot at the too end with when it kicks in but the faster spool would make for a more fun road car.

Just my view but soo many people get carried away with wanting a car with xxx bhp when in fact a car with half of that can be more useable to an "average" driver. Very few can use all of the power at 300 let alone 450+, don't get me wrong its all very nice and puts a smile on your face but other than the straight line stuff what's the point of having a car you can't use properly.

Just my two pence worth but a well set up car with a little more power in the hands of most will be more fun to drive that one with 450+
But then some of us use our cars for track and quarter a lot and need that extra power to not be left behind
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2012 | 09:42 PM
  #54  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

Originally Posted by Anger
If thats what Andy F sells
Lots of reasons for poor spool. Crap turbo, crap mapping, crap spec, wrong uppipe/headers just to name a few. On a 2 litre 1 bar before 3200 rpm from a 420 plus bhp turbo is not bad going.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2012 | 01:30 PM
  #55  
MrNoisy's Avatar
MrNoisy
Supporting Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,096
Likes: 8
From: The South
Default

Kenny, incidentally, what boost is your turbo running at the moment given you're still on standard internals? 1.5?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Belly07
Subaru
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:46 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
Oct 2, 2015 09:22 AM
techdw
ScoobyNet General
12
Sep 28, 2015 07:09 AM
Jon1187
Wanted
3
Sep 17, 2015 08:29 AM
ossett2k2
General Technical
9
Sep 13, 2015 09:35 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:12 PM.