Spec C Type 20
08 March 2012, 10:56 PM
#121
My JDM hawk Sti Type 20 would eat my 340R alive in performance stakes the UK car would need to be 380+ bhp or 400+ to keep up with the response 
handling would be similar in standard form. Although I found it to harsh on the road main problem is the very flexible bushes and very stiff suspension doesn't help comfort or handling IMHO
Im not tracking the 340r but if I was I'd would have possibly gone up a spring rate. So I have softened up the suspension with AST coilovers but now need to sort out bushes as too soft
The biggest missings are
No turbo lag
quick rack
Feedback through steering
Tony
handling would be similar in standard form. Although I found it to harsh on the road main problem is the very flexible bushes and very stiff suspension doesn't help comfort or handling IMHO
Im not tracking the 340r but if I was I'd would have possibly gone up a spring rate. So I have softened up the suspension with AST coilovers but now need to sort out bushes as too soft
The biggest missings are
No turbo lag
quick rack
Feedback through steering
Tony
09 March 2012, 12:48 AM
#122
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: MY99UK-MY02STi-MY99Type R-MY06 T20-MY11 340R-MY05 TYPE25
Posts: 11,468
Received 22 Likes
on
19 Posts
I'm no expert like john felsted but seemed far too rigid on slow speed 70+mph and exit speeds too slow. But with ast dispensing and slightly softer was better at 70"100mpd corners but slightly soft for 120+mph. Too me after changing struts and springs the spring rate is either wrong or the bushes are very soft.
But either way the steering is very soft and defiantly improved with a quick rack etc.
But either way the steering is very soft and defiantly improved with a quick rack etc.
09 March 2012, 10:51 AM
#123
17 March 2012, 09:55 PM
#124
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
crazyspeedfreakz
Wanted
17
05 October 2015 07:19 PM
