Feeling the need for a hot hatch...
#36
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 8 RS
Posts: 6,517
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The mrs has a 172 Cup and it's mega! No ABS or traction, just over 1000kg, and when you get up past 5k revs all hell breaks loose, awesome fun! Handles brilliantly on the right tyres and could embarrass quite a few higher performance cars too
Been thinking of ITBs for it loads of tuning stuff available
Been thinking of ITBs for it loads of tuning stuff available
#37
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lancs
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I currently own a 172 cup which i am looking to sell to get a bugeye.
They are brilliant little cars, handle like they are on rails (the eibachs help) plus with 36mpg they arent thirsty either.
Drive a few different models of hot hatch and make your decision from there
They are brilliant little cars, handle like they are on rails (the eibachs help) plus with 36mpg they arent thirsty either.
Drive a few different models of hot hatch and make your decision from there
#43
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SE Wales
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You mean 80 kg. The 172 Cups (which were a Phase 2 Clio) are 14 kg lighter than the Ph1 172 (which gets leather, aircon, abs and most importantly the more responsive cable operated throttle compared to FBW versions on all the later RS Clios). I competed against a 172 Cup at Haynes' museum track where it went into a hedge, partly due to no abs). If you go down the Clio route expect high revs to go fast. Much better brakes than Scoobs though and better by miles if fitted with DS2500 pads. Finding a good 172 Cup will be hard work unless you're ok with buying a wreck and spending some money - I saw five before buying my Scooby, all terrible. Mods are not worthwhile unless you consider cams and throttle bodies, i.e. you are prepared to spend many 1000s. 182 Cups need inlet manifolds matching (£250ish) and a remap (£250ish) then expect to see 173-175 HP at a reliable rolling road). 172s make 160 to 165 horses - and that's with breathing mods (matched inlet manifolds, exhaust and air filter). My 172 does make around 35 to 40 mpg though and even when driven quite hard. Hope that helps.
#44
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lancs
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You mean 80 kg. The 172 Cups (which were a Phase 2 Clio) are 14 kg lighter than the Ph1 172 (which gets leather, aircon, abs and most importantly the more responsive cable operated throttle compared to FBW versions on all the later RS Clios). I competed against a 172 Cup at Haynes' museum track where it went into a hedge, partly due to no abs). If you go down the Clio route expect high revs to go fast. Much better brakes than Scoobs though and better by miles if fitted with DS2500 pads. Finding a good 172 Cup will be hard work unless you're ok with buying a wreck and spending some money - I saw five before buying my Scooby, all terrible. Mods are not worthwhile unless you consider cams and throttle bodies, i.e. you are prepared to spend many 1000s. 182 Cups need inlet manifolds matching (£250ish) and a remap (£250ish) then expect to see 173-175 HP at a reliable rolling road). 172s make 160 to 165 horses - and that's with breathing mods (matched inlet manifolds, exhaust and air filter). My 172 does make around 35 to 40 mpg though and even when driven quite hard. Hope that helps.
#51
Scooby Regular
Couldn't own one though, aside from the image, I prefer a car I can drive without having to take my shoes off
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM