Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

race dynanics remap......worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 07:50 PM
  #151  
mickywrx's Avatar
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
20 Year Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,778
Likes: 4
From: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Post

Originally Posted by Myles
everyone lining up behind their preferred mapper and throwing stones at each other.
Not me.

Such is life though. Everyone has preferences on everything. Opinions and arseholes springs to mind.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 07:51 PM
  #152  
Myles's Avatar
Myles
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 1
From: Marlow, Bucks.
Default

Originally Posted by The gitS
lol fairone, big fingers small phone
I know the feeling!
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 07:52 PM
  #153  
Myles's Avatar
Myles
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 1
From: Marlow, Bucks.
Default

Originally Posted by mickywrx
Not me.

Such is life though. Everyone has preferences on everything. Opinions and arseholes springs to mind.
You were in the preferred position of having an unmappable ECU! Now you have to make your choice!
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 07:52 PM
  #154  
the hamster's Avatar
the hamster
BANNED
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
From: Melton Mowbray
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F
Correct Micky, ditchmyster is wrong. Once a car has an Ecutek map, any Ecutek mapper can map it, you are not locked out or tied to one mapper. Also many mappers, Duncan included can access Ecutek maps, well most of them anyway, the latest Race Rom from Ecutek has not been hacked yet.
Is this true? I have an ecutek map on my MY00 by Zen which I want tweeked but wont use them. I was told i'm faced with needing a full price mapping session @ £300 + vat to tweek the map (de-cats and 3 port added) if I use another mapper, but would obviously like to reduce my costs on this.

If you could give me any further info feel free to pm me.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 07:56 PM
  #155  
rickya's Avatar
rickya
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,322
Likes: 1
From: Herts/Middx
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F
Correct Micky, ditchmyster is wrong. the latest Race Rom from Ecutek has not been hacked yet.

Oh and just to add, your ECU is mappable now
Romraider & Ecuflash do not hack, or publish Ecutek maps & software. They have spent a lot of time & money reverse engineering the factory ECU

ps somebody in 2006 did hack Ecutek table definitions, called it XMLwrite & from there developed Ecuedit (based in Russia) which uses these hacked def tables & other hacks from Cobb and even Romraider.

All this Im sure you already know but I thought I would just clarify for other forum members.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 07:56 PM
  #156  
mickywrx's Avatar
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
20 Year Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,778
Likes: 4
From: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Post

Originally Posted by Myles
You were in the preferred position of having an unmappable ECU! Now you have to make your choice!
Easy choice for me.......

Originally Posted by the hamster
Is this true? I have an ecutek map on my MY00 by Zen which I want tweeked but wont use them. I was told i'm faced with needing a full price mapping session @ £300 + vat to tweek the map (de-cats and 3 port added) if I use another mapper, but would obviously like to reduce my costs on this.

If you could give me any further info feel free to pm me.
You'd need a full map, but, no licence fee to pay, to the best of my knowledge.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 08:01 PM
  #157  
the hamster's Avatar
the hamster
BANNED
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
From: Melton Mowbray
Default

Originally Posted by mickywrx
You'd need a full map, but, no licence fee to pay, to the best of my knowledge.
Not according to andy F. Reading his post he claims that "other" mappers can read the original map, and therefore tweek it rather than having to write a full map. Would be interesting to see a trading standards point of view on this as surely, if you pay for a map then legally it belongs to you and you should have rights to it??

I was under the impression that this isnt possible, that the mapper locks out the map, puts a large clamp around your bo11ox and you're basically stuck with that mapper unless you go somewhere else.

I know that once you have a license then you only pay for mapping time, thats a one off thing that is done when its first done and remains on the ecu.

Last edited by the hamster; Nov 24, 2011 at 08:03 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 08:08 PM
  #158  
mickywrx's Avatar
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
20 Year Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,778
Likes: 4
From: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Post

Originally Posted by the hamster
Not according to andy F. Reading his post he claims that "other" mappers can read the original map, and therefore tweek it rather than having to write a full map. Would be interesting to see a trading standards point of view on this as surely, if you pay for a map then legally it belongs to you and you should have rights to it??

I was under the impression that this isnt possible, that the mapper locks out the map, puts a large clamp around your bo11ox and you're basically stuck with that mapper unless you go somewhere else.

I know that once you have a license then you only pay for mapping time, thats a one off thing that is done when its first done and remains on the ecu.
Intellectual property mate is my take on it. Send Andy a PM or email though, he will know better than me obviously.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 08:10 PM
  #159  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

I have PM'd you but feel free to post it up if you like.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 08:22 PM
  #160  
ditchmyster's Avatar
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,624
Likes: 7
From: Living the dream
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F
Correct Micky, ditchmyster is wrong. Once a car has an Ecutek map, any Ecutek mapper can map it, you are not locked out or tied to one mapper. Also many mappers, Duncan included can access Ecutek maps, well most of them anyway, the latest Race Rom from Ecutek has not been hacked yet.

Oh and just to add, your ECU is mappable now

lol, re read what i wrote, i did not say you were tied to one mapper i said you are tied to ecutec. and if you fall out with your mapper like some have, then you have to start again, But Only Ecutec, which your post confirms
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 08:32 PM
  #161  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster

they then fooked your ecu for anyone else to be able to map it with any thing other than more ecutec software, and if you, mod further your tied to that particular mapper, so if you become dicgrunteled with one mapper you have then to pay another the full wack for a new map.
Above is where you are wrong, there is software other than Ecutek that can access Ecutek maps on 01-07 cars.
Regarding your point of having to pay for a full new map if you move to another mapper, I should hope so! I wouldn't want to be just tweeking another mappers work. Unless specifically instructed, I'd start from one of my own base maps and then I know its done right I guess that approach comes from many years of Ecutek mapping where you can't steal another tuners work, you can just overwrite it with your own.

Last edited by Andy.F; Nov 24, 2011 at 08:33 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 08:41 PM
  #162  
the hamster's Avatar
the hamster
BANNED
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 0
From: Melton Mowbray
Default

Just want to say thanks to Andy for clearing up the whole "ecutek vs OS" thing for me on my MY00. As he says above, any change of mapper "should" want to write their own so they know the foundations are there, and this is mainly what increases the time/cost.

Hoping to see what offers/availability people have for doing an ecutek map without pulling my pants down as I've paid £550 once for a map then been let down by customer service and got into arguments via phone etc so now I'm faced with another £300+ bill just for adding a de-cat and 3 port.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 09:44 PM
  #163  
Megaman's Avatar
Megaman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Leeds
Default

Originally Posted by uk300_kev
Hi all, been recommended race dynamics for remapping and wanted some views.Will a remap make a big diffrence to drivability/power ect...
Thanks, kev.
Hi Kev,

A remap to tie all the mods together and get things running smoothly will certainly be a benefit for the car and you should notice a fair difference. It may be worth giving one of the well known tuners a bell to find out if they recommend any other low cost mods to do before or at the time of the remap to give you any better power increases whilst you are at it.

With regards to mappers, this is a mine field and every one will have an opinion from their own experiences. Personally I would recommend talking to a number of different mappers and making your own decision on which is the best to go with for your requirements.

Cheers

Martin


Originally Posted by BrownPantsRacing
Been a long time since I read through that thread, can’t remember all to be honest and sure someone will put me right. Car had some bits changed by another garage after it was mapped I believe and a pipe was disconnected. Owner used different petrol on track that car was not mapped on, heard a strange noise from engine and kept pushing it.

I know there were other problems but if it were me and something wasn’t right I would have stopped rather than risking it!

Quite ready for the backlash of replies now! Lol.
Hi BrownPantsRacing,
Just wanted to ensure everyone understands the facts with regards to my car.

My car had no additional modifications following my remap.

No pipes mentioned in that thread were disconnected when the car was recovered to the subaru main dealer, where it was thoroughly inspected by them before being recovered to an alternative subaru specialists to do my repairs.

Car was mapped on V-power and was run on V-power. I was advised to use octane booster by my mapper for track events and did as I was advised to do so.

Thanks

Martin
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 10:00 PM
  #164  
EngineMapper @ Group B Motorsport's Avatar
EngineMapper @ Group B Motorsport
Engine Specialist
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 554
Likes: 1
From: Wrexham, North Wales
Default

Right well, I've been asked by the guys at Silverstone Autosport and the customer mentioned below to respond to this, so I am going to have to, but I didn't really want to get into any technical discussions versus the cars I had done.

With regards to that dyno day at Silverstone that I had organised but unfortunately couldnt make in the end for family reasons, the fan placement was beyond the end of the ramps because (i am informed) they dont bother moving the fan closer on dyno days as it takes up too much time. No surprise to see that some cars with tmics such as yours or steves were seeing the effects of heat build up towards the end of the runs. In an environment that is already handicapping tmic cars, to have such a diffused airflow into the scoop hinders it further.
Be very careful here Duncan, all cars run on the dyno day that I subsequently got asked to remap were also prior run on the day I did the maps. All showed the same problems and I run the fan much closer to the car. In addition to this the fine learning on most of the cars run showed a good majority of det had been seen on the road.

Greg had fitted a full 3 inch exhaust to his just prior to that day and tbh was no surprise that the map was off as a result.
Greg's was running lean due to the induction kit and the maf having not been rescaled to suite. The learning had removed 10% of fuel and applied it since you had mapped it, I reset the ecu to run it again and it showed a safe lambda, the exhaust did not cause this.

I here what you are saying about Scotty's, which is fine, parts were changed as were a couple of others. All the cars I mapped were then dropped off the dyno and run on the road, no changes needed to be made.

That's all I want to say on the matter and hopefully we can leave it at that.

This is now turned into a thread from 22b.com where mappers/tuners wave their ****** around trying to out do one'n'other with what they have done and what they are doing....cracks me up.
Ok so there was a little ***** waving, but I think it educated a lot on the limit of the Denso Pink label sensor! There's another post on there that has popped up about over-boosting on a Simtek that was mapped to 1.6bar on a 1.55 bar map sensor. For those that don't understand the ins and outs of this technical statement, it basically means there is no boost control. Mappers harp on about not de-catting because you will overboost, but at least in that circumstance you will usually have a over-boost safety cut. If a car has been mapped to boost beyond the map sensor limit then you have no control over the turbo whatsoever and no safety boost cut either.

This information is important regardless of how it is presented to you, sorry! It means you as a customer now know what the maximum boost you can safely run with that sensor is.

Graham
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 10:26 PM
  #165  
stevep360's Avatar
stevep360
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
From: Northumberland
Default

Originally Posted by Megaman
Hi Kev,

A remap to tie all the mods together and get things running smoothly will certainly be a benefit for the car and you should notice a fair difference. It may be worth giving one of the well known tuners a bell to find out if they recommend any other low cost mods to do before or at the time of the remap to give you any better power increases whilst you are at it.

With regards to mappers, this is a mine field and every one will have an opinion from their own experiences. Personally I would recommend talking to a number of different mappers and making your own decision on which is the best to go with for your requirements.

Cheers

Martin




Hi BrownPantsRacing,
Just wanted to ensure everyone understands the facts with regards to my car.

My car had no additional modifications following my remap.

No pipes mentioned in that thread were disconnected when the car was recovered to the subaru main dealer, where it was thoroughly inspected by them before being recovered to an alternative subaru specialists to do my repairs.

Car was mapped on V-power and was run on V-power. I was advised to use octane booster by my mapper for track events and did as I was advised to do so.

Thanks

Martin
Hi Martin, I was talking to Howard the other day. Hope you get the car sorted soon mate.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 10:27 PM
  #166  
stevep360's Avatar
stevep360
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
From: Northumberland
Default

Originally Posted by EngineMapper

Ok so there was a little ***** waving, but I think it educated a lot on the limit of the Denso Pink label sensor! There's another post on there that has popped up about over-boosting on a Simtek that was mapped to 1.6bar on a 1.55 bar map sensor. For those that don't understand the ins and outs of this technical statement, it basically means there is no boost control. Mappers harp on about not de-catting because you will overboost, but at least in that circumstance you will usually have a over-boost safety cut. If a car has been mapped to boost beyond the map sensor limit then you have no control over the turbo whatsoever and no safety boost cut either.

This information is important regardless of how it is presented to you, sorry! It means you as a customer now know what the maximum boost you can safely run with that sensor is.

Graham
Graham, I read the thread on 22b ages ago. Just wanted to thank those who contributed as I changed my map sensor via Simon based on what you guys said
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2011 | 11:23 PM
  #167  
Megaman's Avatar
Megaman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: Leeds
Default

Originally Posted by stevep360
Hi Martin, I was talking to Howard the other day. Hope you get the car sorted soon mate.
Hi Steve,
Thanks mate, hopefully it wont take too long to get back on the road, missing 4wd in the greasy weather
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 03:54 AM
  #168  
ScoobyDoo69's Avatar
ScoobyDoo69
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,143
Likes: 3
From: WMI
Default

FWIW I had my car mapped by Duncan nearly 18months ago now, and still find him very easy to contact regarding any queries I may have, contact usually being made back to me very quickly.

My car has since seen 2 full dyno sessions at completely different dyno venues, monitoring AFR etc, a few sprint days, a track day, and quite a lot of quarter mile drags, where I imagine things must get quite hot! At no dyno was I given any bad feedback about the map, only comments of good power and running being made, and the car felt great at the track events.

When I make further tweaks, I will go back to Duncan, it's that simple.

I have no personal experience of JGM's or Andy F's mapping, but my Dad does have a TD04 Hybrid from Andy F on his bugeye, and previously had a TD05 16G on his last bugeye from Andy F too. Both of which performed great and it was a pleasure dealing with Andy. It is mapped by Bob Rawle, as was his previous car too, someone who he trusts and would return to given extra mods.

Unsurprisingly, having been around the Subaru "scene" for years, I had read bad stories about all the mappers mentioned above, and many more I've not mentioned. It does not mean that given the right circumstances that I wouldn't use them though, they are only human afterall.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 01:35 PM
  #169  
happydude303's Avatar
happydude303
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
From: southampton
Default

well all i now is thast my car use to det and run lean as well from y old mapper andy vey from vey sports and all the car he did were like that , my engine broke and was sorted out for fre by triton motorsports who did really ahve to seen as it was 2 years old but that what sort oif guys they are all i paid for was a a crnak and bearings they paid for the rest, then duncan graham came along and sorted out all of our cars and since then we have not had any det lights poping up and have all been very happy and i mean thats a lot of cars he sorted out half of dorset scoobys to be fair and were all very happy , i am a bit upset with all this mud slinging from the above mappers as jgm andy f , i have always held with high regard from word of mouth of many and as for this graham chap you seem to want to get your 2 pences worth, but this thread is way out of control , and as for this chap with the blown engine yeah it is bad luck but then if your traking you car hard a lot and messing with settings its going to cause damage , but then you never now it could ahve been a **** engine build maybe a friday build

Last edited by happydude303; Nov 25, 2011 at 01:37 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 01:40 PM
  #170  
happydude303's Avatar
happydude303
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
From: southampton
Default

this is a quote from engine mappers home page it seems to fit

Why is it that I sign a disclaimer against my car having a failure whilst being mapped?
Whilst we take every care of the vehicle that we are working on, we cannot accept any risk or liability for an engine or component that hasn’t been made/fitted/built through Engine Mapper. Please understand that mapping is an entirely normal and safe procedure, but will push the engine nearer it’s limits in some way or another which could cause a weak component to fail.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 01:51 PM
  #171  
ditchmyster's Avatar
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,624
Likes: 7
From: Living the dream
Default

Yep, i don't know duncan or any of the others for that matter, but as soon as something goes wrong with a car he has mapped all the ecutec boys seem to jump all over him, and this has happened several times and to an outsider it does smack a bit of the old boy network, and in my eyes they do themselves no favours.

If they were really so concerned about all of us then they would do something constructive to help all concerned, including duncan and considering we the community are a large part of their lively hood they may wish to reconsider some of their conduct within it.

Now thats not aimed at anyone in particular, but life aint all about money!!!

Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 02:30 PM
  #172  
TH3_5T1G's Avatar
TH3_5T1G
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere halfway between heaven and hell, some call it earth!
Default

Originally Posted by happydude303
i am a bit upset with all this mud slinging from the above mappers as jgm andy f , i have always held with high regard from word of mouth of many and as for this graham chap you seem to want to get your 2 pences worth, but this thread is way out of control , and as for this chap with the blown engine yeah it is bad luck but then if your traking you car hard a lot and messing with settings its going to cause damage , but then you never now it could ahve been a **** engine build maybe a friday build
I'm not trying to stir further but where has Simon (JGM) mud slung in this thread? He stated it would be unproffesional of him to say anything on the matter and then performed a little sales pitch. That's a fair response if you ask me. Andy has said a few things, of which i neither condemn or condone. He stated he's had to put it on a public forum rather than a PM, as it so far has had no effect. If thats what it takes to get things heading in the right direction then, imo, it's somewhat justified. Furthermore, Graham was advised to put up a response. Saying he seems to want to get his 2 pence worth isn't an accurate statement in my eyes. Graham had stated his events of the mapping day and it's perfectly acceptable to hear the other side of the story... Do you only read one half of a newspaper?

As for Ecutek vs open source, the arguement will always remain on which is better. To say the 'Ecutek' boys are mud slinging due to this feud is pathetic. Looks to me like they're unhappy with someone in thier line of business giving them somewhat of a bad name. Would you accept a colleague at work doing the same to your company/trade? I'm not so sure.

All of this aside, if people want to use any of the mappers, do so. It's your car, you're more than entitled to choose who you want to map your car. So let's stop with all the b*tching and leave that to the chavs on Jeremy Kyle shall we

Last edited by TH3_5T1G; Nov 25, 2011 at 04:29 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 03:34 PM
  #173  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
Yep, i don't know duncan or any of the others for that matter, but as soon as something goes wrong with a car he has mapped all the ecutec boys seem to jump all over him, and this has happened several times and to an outsider it does smack a bit of the old boy network, and in my eyes they do themselves no favours.

If they were really so concerned about all of us then they would do something constructive to help all concerned, including duncan and considering we the community are a large part of their lively hood they may wish to reconsider some of their conduct within it.

Now thats not aimed at anyone in particular, but life aint all about money!!!

I agree with you on that one, its not all about money. I do both Ecutek and Open Source mapping, guess what, there is more profit in OS! Despite this however I still recommend Ecutek.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 04:11 PM
  #174  
AN07 PTN's Avatar
AN07 PTN
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Buckingham
Default

if someone is really as bad at doing something as people say then you know it wont take long for them to lose customers .
from what i can make of this thread at some point most people make mistakes.. after all we all do it.. i admit i have used duncan many times now both on road and rr i trust him totally to do the right thing by me and my pride and joy.
had i of lived in areas near other mappers when i first started with my modding bug then maybe i would be saying the same about them..

let your work do the talking guys and the customers will decide!!!
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 04:30 PM
  #175  
KAS35RSTI's Avatar
KAS35RSTI
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,923
Likes: 10
From: 2.0 bar
Default

This thread has brang back some bad memories. I still remember how i was given the car back straight off the dyno with no road tweaking and with the engine light on. 'Apparently' the engine light was cam sensor related. However it was working perfectly fine! The guy didnt give a flyn EF, when i asked him outside the dyno shop. Facial expressions say alot!

At first things are all hunky dorry, but when you have concerns etc you get ignored and get fed with lies. Makes me sick!
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 04:59 PM
  #176  
AN07 PTN's Avatar
AN07 PTN
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Buckingham
Default

Originally Posted by Kas Spec C
This thread has brang back some bad memories. I still remember how i was given the car back straight off the dyno with no road tweaking and with the engine light on. 'Apparently' the engine light was cam sensor related. However it was working perfectly fine! The guy didnt give a flyn EF, when i asked him outside the dyno shop. Facial expressions say alot!

At first things are all hunky dorry, but when you have concerns etc you get ignored and get fed with lies. Makes me sick!
i guess no matter what your line of work is differant people will have differant views of your work.

i think the problem with modding cars is that people lose sight of what is best for there cars in search of more power or speed.

at the end of the day standard is probably safest.
sometimes you push things and they go pop.

thems the risks you take i guess
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 05:10 PM
  #177  
beezor's Avatar
beezor
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 253
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by EngineMapper
Right well, I've been asked by the guys at Silverstone Autosport and the customer mentioned below to respond to this, so I am going to have to, but I didn't really want to get into any technical discussions versus the cars I had done.

Be very careful here Duncan, all cars run on the dyno day that I subsequently got asked to remap were also prior run on the day I did the maps. All showed the same problems and I run the fan much closer to the car. In addition to this the fine learning on most of the cars run showed a good majority of det had been seen on the road.

Greg's was running lean due to the induction kit and the maf having not been rescaled to suite. The learning had removed 10% of fuel and applied it since you had mapped it, I reset the ecu to run it again and it showed a safe lambda, the exhaust did not cause this.

I here what you are saying about Scotty's, which is fine, parts were changed as were a couple of others. All the cars I mapped were then dropped off the dyno and run on the road, no changes needed to be made.

That's all I want to say on the matter and hopefully we can leave it at that.

Ok so there was a little ***** waving, but I think it educated a lot on the limit of the Denso Pink label sensor! There's another post on there that has popped up about over-boosting on a Simtek that was mapped to 1.6bar on a 1.55 bar map sensor. For those that don't understand the ins and outs of this technical statement, it basically means there is no boost control. Mappers harp on about not de-catting because you will overboost, but at least in that circumstance you will usually have a over-boost safety cut. If a car has been mapped to boost beyond the map sensor limit then you have no control over the turbo whatsoever and no safety boost cut either.

This information is important regardless of how it is presented to you, sorry! It means you as a customer now know what the maximum boost you can safely run with that sensor is.

Graham
That is my car that you are referring to in regards to the thread i posted on 22b about my car overboosting,i only brought the car a couple of weeks ago and it is now apparent the car was mapped to 1.6 bar on the oe 1.55 bar map sensor which i find very strange to say the least! and i would like to point out that it was Duncan that pointed this out to me and told me it needed replacing with a 3 bar map sensor.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 05:53 PM
  #178  
wrxsti280's Avatar
wrxsti280
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 0
From: stoke on trent
Default

If someone is really as bad at doing something as people say then you know it wont take long for them to lose customers .

I'm not so sure about that, not the way people on here rubbish other peoples opinions, advice and personal experiences!!!! And go **** long into whatever they wish no matter what
advice they are given after asking for it!!!
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 07:52 PM
  #179  
mickywrx's Avatar
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
20 Year Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,778
Likes: 4
From: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Post

Originally Posted by wrxsti280
And go **** long into whatever they wish no matter what advice they are given after asking for it!!!
A lot of folk will ask for advice, having already made their minds up that they are going to do whatever before asking.

Some people are as thick as bricks.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2011 | 08:09 PM
  #180  
craigyp's Avatar
craigyp
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,788
Likes: 0
From: Mansfield
Default

Another simple question thread got out of hand!!
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 PM.