Lower Isn't Always Better

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 23, 2011 | 07:31 PM

#31

Scoober-Dubs

Thread Starter

Scooby Regular

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Feb 2009

Posts: 240

Likes: 0

From: Chelmsford, Essex

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnD

There are numbers on the springs that relate to the free (uncompressed) length and the rate (Kg per mm compression)

JohnD

Oh... OK. Will have to check it out tomorrow. Adjusted the damper settings as per your earlier post, works quite well; much better.

Jul 23, 2011 | 07:50 PM

#32

Scoober-Dubs

Thread Starter

Scooby Regular

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Feb 2009

Posts: 240

Likes: 0

From: Chelmsford, Essex

Quote:

Originally Posted by Connor_scotland

I am having the same issue pal car looks awesome but doesnt handle to well

Any pics of the new height?

Pics of the new height as promised...

Please excuse the headlights, they're temporary.

Jul 24, 2011 | 07:12 PM

#33

bonesetter

Scooby Regular

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 3,492

Likes: 6

From: Midlands

My height was dictated by a shock collar ring becoming too tight to adjust any higher. As it turned out height was OK, I ended up with the front at 350mm and the rear 335 (hub to wheel arch) which worked well

I think I remember hearing Tein recommend F355/R340