Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Wikileaks and Guantanamo - watching the Americans squirm :-)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26 April 2011, 04:57 PM
  #31  
Maz
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
 
Maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 15,884
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wayne9t9
100,000 Iraqis killed, how many of them were terrorists? I`m guessing less than 1 in 4. Lets just say I don`t agree with the U.S. foreign policy.
Collateral damage.
Maz is offline  
Old 26 April 2011, 06:05 PM
  #32  
SpecDscooby
Scooby Regular
 
SpecDscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: 07 Spec D, in progress
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

^^^^ thanks mr Bush, or can i call you George W
SpecDscooby is offline  
Old 26 April 2011, 06:09 PM
  #33  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Einstein RA
Collateral damage.
Who killed the 100,000 Iraqi's?

Answer is it was other Iraqis.
tony de wonderful is offline  
Old 26 April 2011, 06:39 PM
  #34  
AsifScoob
Scooby Regular
 
AsifScoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Who killed the 100,000 Iraqi's?

Answer is it was other Iraqis.

No, they were all murdered by Mossad, the IDF and US Drone attacks.

See, I can be silly too!
AsifScoob is offline  
Old 26 April 2011, 06:47 PM
  #35  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...xtremists.html

Maybe we should be squirming - how could we be so stupid as to let this go on for so long?
cster is offline  
Old 26 April 2011, 07:47 PM
  #36  
SpecDscooby
Scooby Regular
 
SpecDscooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: 07 Spec D, in progress
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Dont know what i rate lower...The Telegraph or Wikileaks......both glamorised sh1te for me!.....

Why should "we" be squirming?...its no more in our control who goes to a mosque than it is who we goto war with....we are the drones. That is "demorcratic" life for you.

You can either put up with it or go Raul Moate on people. Either way we will still be at war for oil, and we will still have terrorists in the uk when we wake up in the morning.
SpecDscooby is offline  
Old 26 April 2011, 08:13 PM
  #37  
fpan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
fpan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 3,423
Received 174 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Mr Wonderful, would you fancy a job in Guantanamo killing innocent people?
I bet you would.
fpan is offline  
Old 26 April 2011, 09:08 PM
  #38  
Suresh
Scooby Regular
 
Suresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,622
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
Who killed the 100,000 Iraqi's?

Answer is it was other Iraqis.
Indeed it was.

Not happy with what the Americans have been doing in Gitmo, but given they could have just shot them dead and buried them in desert, then this wasn't too bad. The truth will out,
Suresh is offline  
Old 26 April 2011, 09:52 PM
  #39  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suresh
Indeed it was.

Not happy with what the Americans have been doing in Gitmo, but given they could have just shot them dead and buried them in desert, then this wasn't too bad. The truth will out,
That is a good point, and in most times and societies that would have happened.
tony de wonderful is offline  
Old 26 April 2011, 09:58 PM
  #40  
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
New_scooby_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Just had the pleasure of watching some American government spokesman squriming over the initial Wikileaks disclosures about Guantanamo

- 150 complete innocents held for years for no good reason
- a 14 year old boy who said spokesman claimed was a murderer before remembering to STFU
- only 220 of the sum of all detainees are actually terrorists

and so on

And that is before we have got to the techniques used to extract information that the American government seem very keen to hush up!!!

And people on here tell us these are the good guys LOL!
Still better statistics than Butlins in Minehead!

Last edited by New_scooby_04; 27 April 2011 at 10:52 AM.
New_scooby_04 is offline  
Old 26 April 2011, 10:31 PM
  #41  
Mus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Mus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: will be back in another scooby in time....
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suresh
Indeed it was.

Not happy with what the Americans have been doing in Gitmo, but given they could have just shot them dead and buried them in desert, then this wasn't too bad. The truth will out,
if people knew the truth then I guess everyone will be anti government, It wouldn't suprise me if there is a few iraqis buried in the desert.

politicians are filthy rich and its not for there honest good work is it?they are some of the biggest deceivers how many promises have you heard from politicians? a lot of them do things I.e weapons of mass destruction for there own agenda (oil)
Mus is offline  
Old 26 April 2011, 10:40 PM
  #42  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mus
if people knew the truth then I guess everyone will be anti government, It wouldn't suprise me if there is a few iraqis buried in the desert.

politicians are filthy rich and its not for there honest good work is it?they are some of the biggest deceivers how many promises have you heard from politicians? a lot of them do things I.e weapons of mass destruction for there own agenda (oil)
Are you a fascist Mus? You seem to have no faith in democracy upon which to start a dialogue.
tony de wonderful is offline  
Old 26 April 2011, 10:57 PM
  #43  
Mus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Mus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: will be back in another scooby in time....
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Einstein RA
Collateral damage.
just watched the video.
Mus is offline  
Old 26 April 2011, 11:53 PM
  #44  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
can you tell me what definition of the term "terrorist" you are using?
How about instead, you try reading the thread more carefully? Specifically the part that makes it plain it's not my definition, but F1_fan's or whoever's it was he was quoting.
markjmd is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 12:33 AM
  #45  
AsifScoob
Scooby Regular
 
AsifScoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
That is a good point, and in most times and societies that would have happened.
So what you're saying Tone, is that the several hundred thousand US Troops in Iraq, armed to the teeth and seemingly shooting constantly, as per the news coverage I have seen, hundreds of aircraft dropping bombs everywhere, the 'surge' through Fallujah, the thousands of private security guys out there, with a free reign to shoot whomever they like etc etc etc

All that, resulted in nothing else but the Iraqis seemingly turning their guns on each other?

The level of stupidity in your statements is unbelieveable! It is so unbelieveable I cannot believe I am replying to it!!

So, who caused the 20k odd US casualties? As the US is easily the most highly armed group in the country and seemingly firing constantly, but not killing any Iraqis, they obviously all shot each other? Like the Iraqis did? Going by your logic?

Actually I have to laugh!
AsifScoob is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 12:45 AM
  #46  
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
banny sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Type R
Posts: 16,598
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AsifScoob
So what you're saying Tone, is that the several hundred thousand US Troops in Iraq, armed to the teeth and seemingly shooting constantly, as per the news coverage I have seen, hundreds of aircraft dropping bombs everywhere, the 'surge' through Fallujah, the thousands of private security guys out there, with a free reign to shoot whomever they like etc etc etc

All that, resulted in nothing else but the Iraqis seemingly turning their guns on each other?

The level of stupidity in your statements is unbelieveable! It is so unbelieveable I cannot believe I am replying to it!!

So, who caused the 20k odd US casualties? As the US is easily the most highly armed group in the country and seemingly firing constantly, but not killing any Iraqis, they obviously all shot each other? Like the Iraqis did? Going by your logic?

Actually I have to laugh!
banny sti is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 12:59 AM
  #47  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AsifScoob
So what you're saying Tone, is that the several hundred thousand US Troops in Iraq, armed to the teeth and seemingly shooting constantly, as per the news coverage I have seen, hundreds of aircraft dropping bombs everywhere, the 'surge' through Fallujah, the thousands of private security guys out there, with a free reign to shoot whomever they like etc etc etc

All that, resulted in nothing else but the Iraqis seemingly turning their guns on each other?

The level of stupidity in your statements is unbelieveable! It is so unbelieveable I cannot believe I am replying to it!!

So, who caused the 20k odd US casualties? As the US is easily the most highly armed group in the country and seemingly firing constantly, but not killing any Iraqis, they obviously all shot each other? Like the Iraqis did? Going by your logic?

Actually I have to laugh!
All sounds logical to me
f1_fan is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 01:21 AM
  #48  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Saddam was a Sunni. Most Shi'a (the majority in Iraq) celebrated Saddam's removal. Most Sunni hated the coalition for it. The vast majority of Muslims living in the UK are Sunni. I wonder if the British Sunnis would be so quick to criticise the removal of the Syrian minority Shi'a leadership?

Syria - Sunni v Shi'a
Bharain - Sunni v Shi'a
Iraq - Sunni v Shi'a
Saudi Arabia - Sunni v Shi'a
Yemen - Sunni v Shi'a
Lebanon - Sunni v Shi'a
etc.

Are America responsible for a 1400 year old rift?
JTaylor is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 01:27 AM
  #49  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
All sounds logical to me
See if you can come up with a logical response to my question on your Syria thread, I'm looking forward to reading your ideas.

@ Banny - Perhaps you have some thoughts on Syria.

@ Asif - what do you think should be the UNSC's position on Syria?

JTaylor is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 01:50 AM
  #50  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
See if you can come up with a logical response to my question on your Syria thread, I'm looking forward to reading your ideas.

@ Banny - Perhaps you have some thoughts on Syria.

@ Asif - what do you think should be the UNSC's position on Syria?

Nah wouldn't want to bore you with my 'drivel'
f1_fan is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 04:15 AM
  #51  
Mus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Mus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: will be back in another scooby in time....
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Shia and Sunni isn't as bad as people make out it's like Jewish and Zionist.... actually calling someone a Zionist isn't nice so I take it back. I'm Sunni and I have many Shia friends we come from different school of thoughts. I was tought to say (may god guide them) and pretty sure them say the same. yes u might get the few the won't like each other but it certainly ain't the norm. Like I said I have a lot of Shia friends and so all this bs about Sunni bs Shia is properly something your petrol hungry prople created to have a reason to stay to nick more oil. there was never this much fighting between the two groups.
Mus is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 07:32 AM
  #52  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SpecDscooby
Dont know what i rate lower...The Telegraph or Wikileaks......both glamorised sh1te for me!.....
Well as long as you rate them both lower than foreigners who come to the UK to preach treason and sew hatred among the populace, I guess there is no problem
cster is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 07:49 AM
  #53  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Nah wouldn't want to bore you with my 'drivel'
Result.

ETA. Joking aside, it looks like people on that thread are interested to see what you think, f1. Surely, if you're prepared to criticise, you have a clear position. I'm sure you wouldn't want people to think it was arbitrary criticism.

Last edited by JTaylor; 27 April 2011 at 08:16 AM. Reason: ETA
JTaylor is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 07:53 AM
  #54  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mus
Shia and Sunni isn't as bad as people make out it's like Jewish and Zionist.... actually calling someone a Zionist isn't nice so I take it back. I'm Sunni and I have many Shia friends we come from different school of thoughts. I was tought to say (may god guide them) and pretty sure them say the same. yes u might get the few the won't like each other but it certainly ain't the norm. Like I said I have a lot of Shia friends and so all this bs about Sunni bs Shia is properly something your petrol hungry prople created to have a reason to stay to nick more oil. there was never this much fighting between the two groups.
Is this a serious post, Mus?

Last edited by JTaylor; 27 April 2011 at 07:55 AM.
JTaylor is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 08:09 AM
  #55  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AsifScoob
So what you're saying Tone, is that the several hundred thousand US Troops in Iraq, armed to the teeth and seemingly shooting constantly, as per the news coverage I have seen, hundreds of aircraft dropping bombs everywhere, the 'surge' through Fallujah, the thousands of private security guys out there, with a free reign to shoot whomever they like etc etc etc

All that, resulted in nothing else but the Iraqis seemingly turning their guns on each other?

The level of stupidity in your statements is unbelieveable! It is so unbelieveable I cannot believe I am replying to it!!

So, who caused the 20k odd US casualties? As the US is easily the most highly armed group in the country and seemingly firing constantly, but not killing any Iraqis, they obviously all shot each other? Like the Iraqis did? Going by your logic?

Actually I have to laugh!
That is all demagoguery. I never said the US caused NO casualties but it is a historical fact that the vast majority of deaths were caused by Iraqi internecine, sectarian conflict. You remember? The suicide bombs killing dozens in market places etc etc? The shia mosques getting blow up?

Americans both in the Army and as private contractors have been prosecuted for unlawful killings. Please they did not have 'free reign'?
tony de wonderful is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 09:49 AM
  #56  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well that's two of you out, I wonder what Asif has to say about Syria. Remember, Sunni uprising.

Last edited by JTaylor; 27 April 2011 at 09:56 AM.
JTaylor is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 10:02 AM
  #57  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's the link:

https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby...084-syria.html

JTaylor is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 10:08 AM
  #58  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
Result.

ETA. Joking aside, it looks like people on that thread are interested to see what you think, f1. Surely, if you're prepared to criticise, you have a clear position. I'm sure you wouldn't want people to think it was arbitrary criticism.
f1_fan is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 10:59 AM
  #59  
AsifScoob
Scooby Regular
 
AsifScoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
That is all demagoguery. I never said the US caused NO casualties but it is a historical fact that the vast majority of deaths were caused by Iraqi internecine, sectarian conflict. You remember? The suicide bombs killing dozens in market places etc etc? The shia mosques getting blow up?

Americans both in the Army and as private contractors have been prosecuted for unlawful killings. Please they did not have 'free reign'?
Tony,

Please don't accuse me of something that you do ALL of the time. What is your defence of Israel if it is not demogoguery? (As well as bollocks!)

In post 33 above you state the following:

"Who killed the 100,000 Iraqi's?

Answer is it was other Iraqis."

This is quite clear and in direct contradiction to what you have just stated. You said you have "Never stated that", but you just did! How do you explain that?

If you have some figures I would be interested, otherwise the deaths are all the cause of the illegal invasion for oil, regardless of the religious background, skin colour, nationality, political allegiance, uniform, sexual preferences, car they own, whatever, of who pulled the trigger.

And we all know who is responsible for the illegal war, don't we?

Since you arrived here on SN you have done nothing but start arguments between people, while accusing your detractors of demogoguery, Ad Hominem attacks, etc etc. No one used to do this before.

This place used to be run by common sense, something that you appear to lack.

Why you are still allowed to operate here, in the way that you do, is beyond me.

Asif
AsifScoob is offline  
Old 27 April 2011, 12:21 PM
  #60  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AsifScoob
This is quite clear and in direct contradiction to what you have just stated. You said you have "Never stated that", but you just did! How do you explain that?
Not in essence. In essence the vast bulk of the deaths were the result of Iraqi-on-Iraqi violence and also the foreign jihadist.

In practice the US did kill a number of Iraqis but not in genocide numbers...and apart from a handful of illegal killings (which you will notice people have been prosecuted for), most of the deaths were either accidental or the legal killing of combatants.

Otherwise you are accusing the US of genocide and I'd like to see your evidence. Note - Mus' youtube videos don't count.

Originally Posted by AsifScoob
If you have some figures I would be interested, otherwise the deaths are all the cause of the illegal invasion for oil, regardless of the religious background, skin colour, nationality, political allegiance, uniform, sexual preferences, car they own, whatever, of who pulled the trigger.

And we all know who is responsible for the illegal war, don't we?
No if an individual pulls the trigger and kills someone they must take moral responsibility.
tony de wonderful is offline  


Quick Reply: Wikileaks and Guantanamo - watching the Americans squirm :-)



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:12 AM.