Once again you are manufacturing what you think is an answer in an effort to skirt the truth.

Irag made a move towards Kuwait at the beginning of the 60's when it was under our protection. We launched our forces to stand by to attack in order to protect Kuwait which was absolutely the right action.

In 1990 Iraq moved into Kuwait and the allies led by the US attacked Iraq to shift them out of Kuwait. When that was achieved, SH was allowed to continue as leader. Once again the correct action.

These actions were carried out legally in order to protect and release Kuwait.

This was akin to the actions that Hitler was carrying out in Europe and that is why we went to war against Germany. Once again for the right reasons, not as you said purely for regime change.

The latest attack on Iraq was said to be because we were lied to by the leaders concerned about the threat of WMD which was against the intelligence of the time but was used as an excuse to make that attack.

Not a valid excuse however much like Billy Liar you fall back on the excuse of regime change which is wrong and also not an internationally accepted reason for an attack on a country.

See if you can read this and understand what I am saying. If not...please feel free to ask! I have made it as simple as I can.

Les