Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

2.1 or 2.5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08 October 2010, 08:02 AM
  #61  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It was just so the OP wasnt led astray by thinking he could shove all that power into a standard 2.5 casing and get away with it.
Old 08 October 2010, 08:53 AM
  #62  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

What heads and cams have you got on that car banny?
Old 08 October 2010, 08:56 AM
  #63  
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
banny sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Type R
Posts: 16,598
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Ported VVT heads and lateral cams

This is a forged 2.5 with standard sti 5 heads and a MD321T+


Last edited by banny sti; 08 October 2010 at 09:06 AM.
Old 08 October 2010, 09:18 AM
  #64  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Just goes to show how quickly mine spools up. I dont think I'll change my cams now
Old 08 October 2010, 09:54 AM
  #65  
billsandhu
Scooby Regular
 
billsandhu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Heres mines, built 2.5 with sti4 heads and S206 turbo. Rev limit is set 7.5k

Old 08 October 2010, 11:16 AM
  #66  
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
MartynJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 2,629
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by banny sti
This nonsense that 2.5 wont rev is unfounded, you just need the right turbo


Banny, we all know the 2.5 can rev



but I don't think that the OP wants to go that extent.
Old 08 October 2010, 11:17 AM
  #67  
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
banny sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Type R
Posts: 16,598
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

That car was written off pretty recently
Old 08 October 2010, 12:01 PM
  #68  
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by banny sti
That car was written off pretty recently
Not quite! it's coming back soon, having been repaired.
Old 08 October 2010, 12:07 PM
  #69  
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
banny sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Type R
Posts: 16,598
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

A friend bidded on the car but it ended up going for a little more than he was willing to spend, look forward to seeing it back to full glory
Old 08 October 2010, 12:27 PM
  #70  
jef
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
jef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: here, there, everywhere
Posts: 3,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

im going semi forged (just pistons) 2.5

with sc46
simtek ect

hopefully be fairly quick with good torqe

would like it a bit over 400bhp

plenty for my use
Old 08 October 2010, 12:43 PM
  #71  
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Re 2.1/2.5 we say you can get a better result from a 2.1 if you aren't going to the extent of cam and head work. 567 bhp from stock heads and cams?
Bargain..
Old 08 October 2010, 04:33 PM
  #72  
chrisdicko
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (21)
 
chrisdicko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Alan,
At what stage would you recommend head work? What's the max power you *should* easily see from STI8 VVT heads, without doing much work to them?
Old 08 October 2010, 04:43 PM
  #73  
bigarf
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (67)
 
bigarf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: w,yorkshire
Posts: 4,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

since were all posting graphs up,heres mine.

enginetuner 2.1,and yes it does exactly what it says on the tin.
Old 08 October 2010, 04:44 PM
  #74  
JdcTypeR
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
JdcTypeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In my car
Posts: 1,412
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MartynJ
What model and year of car do you have James ?
Martyn, i have a v4 sti type r
Old 08 October 2010, 05:03 PM
  #75  
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrisdicko
Alan,
At what stage would you recommend head work? What's the max power you *should* easily see from STI8 VVT heads, without doing much work to them?
I'd say it's the 567 bhp we ended up with! Of course you need the right turbo and bits to go with it.
Old 08 October 2010, 05:05 PM
  #76  
chrisdicko
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (21)
 
chrisdicko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I see. So the VVT heads should see well over 500bhp as standard, as long as you have a 500+ turbo, plus supporting mods.
Old 08 October 2010, 05:12 PM
  #77  
JdcTypeR
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
JdcTypeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In my car
Posts: 1,412
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MartynJ
Banny, we all know the 2.5 can rev



but I don't think that the OP wants to go that extent.
No not to that extreme...... at the moment
Old 08 October 2010, 05:15 PM
  #78  
JdcTypeR
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
JdcTypeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: In my car
Posts: 1,412
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its sounding like the 2.1 at the moment then but i would like to hear from people who have the 2.35
Old 08 October 2010, 05:30 PM
  #79  
carpboy
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
carpboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Enginetuner rebuilt my sti ra version 2 heads using standard valves when i brought a 2.1 off them and im getting 480bhp and 450 torque
Old 08 October 2010, 05:33 PM
  #80  
Mus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Mus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: will be back in another scooby in time....
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if I had a chance to do it again on a classic it would be a 2.3 if it was a newage I would go 2.1 with avcs. not taking anything away from a 2.5 as I loved my 2.5 and yes they do rev very well
Old 08 October 2010, 05:34 PM
  #81  
Mus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Mus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: will be back in another scooby in time....
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

double post

Last edited by Mus; 08 October 2010 at 06:25 PM.
Old 08 October 2010, 05:34 PM
  #82  
Mus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Mus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: will be back in another scooby in time....
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

triple post bloody iPhone

Last edited by Mus; 08 October 2010 at 06:24 PM.
Old 08 October 2010, 09:32 PM
  #83  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bigarf
since were all posting graphs up,heres mine.

enginetuner 2.1,and yes it does exactly what it says on the tin.
Over 150bhp more than mine. Yet strangely torque is identical.

What fuel was that on Arf?
Old 08 October 2010, 11:47 PM
  #84  
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
MartynJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 2,629
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
Over 150bhp more than mine. Yet strangely torque is identical.

What fuel was that on Arf?

Nothing strange about it Daz, it does have over 500lbft for near as dammit 2000rpm.
Fuel was VPower and 20% meth.
Old 09 October 2010, 07:35 AM
  #85  
bigarf
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (67)
 
bigarf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: w,yorkshire
Posts: 4,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

as martyn says 20% meth with vpower and thats only at 2bar.the pull from the torque is unbeleivable to say its only a 2.1 and when that starts to tail off the bhp just keeps going and going.the main thing for me though is the reliabilaty of it,up to now it has proved to be rock solid even at that power and thats what means the most to me.
Old 09 October 2010, 01:01 PM
  #86  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info. I'm just trying to find enough info so I can decide whether i want uprated cams or not. However i dont want to lose my spool up which is full boost from a GT35R Billet at <4000rpm. I Love the way the car drives now.
Old 09 October 2010, 04:42 PM
  #87  
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
MartynJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 2,629
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It is possible that your standard cams are beginning to hold you back at that level Daz.
We are shortly going to try a turbo swap on this one currently running a .63 GT35R.



We are going to try an SC35R Billet with a .82 housing and are hoping for similar spool but better top end. We have mentioned to the owner that his stock heads and cams may be a limiting factor to outright output, but don't want to lose too much in the midrange.

Martyn
Old 09 October 2010, 06:50 PM
  #88  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

That's exactly what has happened. It wont take anymore timing and more boost doesnt make any difference. We're going to try some race fuel but the gut feeling is that cams are stopping play. Do you have any graphs of 2.5/ avcs heads /35R and the cosworth S2 cams anywhere for comparison Martyn?
Old 09 October 2010, 08:58 PM
  #89  
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
stevebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

This is one of the only graphs I have when mine was mapped by Paul on my 2.5ltr block, this was at 1.6bar as the injectors maxed out at 5500rpm. It was on my normal GT35 with .63 housing. It wouldof been nice to see what it was like when it was mapped to 2.2bar but I never got one.



Old 09 October 2010, 11:28 PM
  #90  
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
MartynJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 2,629
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
That's exactly what has happened. It wont take anymore timing and more boost doesnt make any difference. We're going to try some race fuel but the gut feeling is that cams are stopping play. Do you have any graphs of 2.5/ avcs heads /35R and the cosworth S2 cams anywhere for comparison Martyn?
As if by magic, lol.



This one has the Cosworth CNC heads aswell as the valvetrain.

Last edited by MartynJ; 09 October 2010 at 11:30 PM.


Quick Reply: 2.1 or 2.5



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:39 AM.