Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

ASTRA VXR!!! :(

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11 May 2010, 05:53 PM
  #121  
vxrking
Scooby Newbie
 
vxrking's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Never been beat by an sti though
Old 11 May 2010, 05:53 PM
  #122  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vxrking
I have an astra vxr stage 3. 312bhp, RARB, LSD, bigger brakes, springs and so on. 0 - 60 believe it or not the astra at stage 3 doesnt do too bad with LSD against the sti and from a rolling start the astra blows the sti away with ease. I've never had any problems keeping up with a sti on corners untill i get to a very tight corner or a roundabout in the wet. Both completly different cars though... but you lot must admit being overtaken by an astra must make you think "what the heck"
Not that different these days to be honest. One is a good looking fwd hatch and the other is an ugly 4wd hatch
Old 11 May 2010, 05:55 PM
  #123  
vxrking
Scooby Newbie
 
vxrking's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dont know why you think the scooby is ugly. I think they look pretty nice to be honest
Old 11 May 2010, 06:06 PM
  #124  
chris cairns
Scooby Regular
 
chris cairns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vxrking
Never been beat by an sti though

i appreciate the fact that your car is fast but i bet if you spent the same amount of cash that you have spent on your astra on a sti the sti will be quicker
Old 11 May 2010, 06:10 PM
  #125  
vxrking
Scooby Newbie
 
vxrking's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes but if my car breaks because of me making the car faster, its easier and cheaper to repair
Old 11 May 2010, 06:15 PM
  #126  
chris-RB5
Scooby Regular
 
chris-RB5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vxrking
Yes but if my car breaks because of me making the car faster, its easier and cheaper to repair
Yes but what you have probably spent, if it did go into a sti, it wouldn't break!!!
Old 11 May 2010, 06:24 PM
  #127  
The Trooper 1815
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
 
The Trooper 1815's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: To the valley men!
Posts: 19,156
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STEVECHAPS
Deluded M8, the '96 era scooby has around 320-340nm torque(?), the hatch STi PPP has 470.........is it 40% heavier? (Lighter than a blob or hawk from what I can tell).
What the hell did you test drive to get such a downer?
Cannot see how it was a STi, STi ppp or a 330S.
I wouldn't be fazed coming up against ANY of today's hot hatches in mine, both straight line or twisties.
Steve (Who sold 1 classic after being slaughtered by an Audi v8 barge & had a lift off oversteer 'problem' with t'other)
Nope. The MY C2 Series 96 STi and RA STi had 319 Nm in standard form.

It was the MY97 D Series Type R's that had 352Nm and STi/RA STi's had 343Nms.

The JDM Bugeye STi's had 373Nm and the UK STi had 343Nm. The UK Hatch is 407Nm but the JDM STi as 422Nm. But they are fat old things.
Old 11 May 2010, 06:34 PM
  #128  
The Trooper 1815
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
 
The Trooper 1815's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: To the valley men!
Posts: 19,156
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Who needs speed when you have the flat four burble. Luv's it I do's
Old 11 May 2010, 06:46 PM
  #129  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,341
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
Touring cars are fwd or rwd, they did bin the 4x4 volvo's though and F1 cars are rwd, we can keep this up for an age
Oh, grp B cars were fwd or rwd some were even 4wd

Tony

C'mon, by the start of the '86 season, how many of the serious contenders in Group-B didn't have 4wd?
Old 11 May 2010, 06:52 PM
  #130  
mit
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
mit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Are the VXR's expensive to tune?
Old 11 May 2010, 07:14 PM
  #131  
cossie_eater
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
cossie_eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: south east
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blue Dragoon
Who needs speed when you have the flat four burble. Luv's it I do's
enough said
Old 11 May 2010, 07:16 PM
  #132  
dan69royal
Scooby Regular
 
dan69royal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
There will be lots of differences between the 2 cars, well several actually but what is the gearing like on the VXR? I know my 1.9 CDTI could probably hit 150mph if tuned, so gearing on the vxr to about 165mph? and what sort of torque levels are you talking for a 300bhp vxr?
Plus the vxr is a good car, but there are a few subaru's out there that have also done the nurburgring in under 8 mins (ok just under but still under ) as out of the box cars, and tested by subaru to get those figures

Also, what sort of cost does it take to get a vxr to 400+bhp, its rather cheap to do that with the newer shape subaru Impreza STI's than the older classic shape (about 3k for 400+), so are we really wasting money?
Are the VXR's also twin scroll turbo's? if so which turbo's do you use and what is the standard unit on them?

Tony

the mk 5 astra cdti has the same gear box, not too sure on the axact ratios though. dont have them to hand. i have had 160mph out of my vxr. very private road. your talking 10k plus for just the power id say, then handling on top of that. not cheap at all i know. as for the turbo side of things, the standard turbo on the vxr is rather small compared to evo/sti as standard. but that is very handy day to day. not much lag in any speed/gear. id imagine same sort of resonse to a twin scroll, although nowhere near as powerfull. but the thing with most single turbos, especially big turbos, is lag. the vxr has garret upgrades available. up to the gt30/5 modified i think. not trying to sound one sided if thats what yor thinking. had a vxr and more or less took it apart and back together again. just got my subaru so cant realy gob off about it too much.
Old 11 May 2010, 07:31 PM
  #133  
VXRBOY
Scooby Regular
 
VXRBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My God how people have changed their tunes and realised what the VXR is. I was arguing on here years ago about how fast the VXR was and was constantly told how i was wrong. I had owned 2 scoobies a WRX and an STI both standard. Then bought a VXR in November 2005 as i got a discount through family. The VXR is seriously quick in standard form and would batter a WRX hands down and was more than a challenge to an STI. I was one of the first in the country to have 300BHP upgrade from Thorney back in 2006. and it was silly quick. The talk about torque steer was tosh, plus I believe the Top Gear track time was made with the VXR without the proper runnig gear (a pre production model). Dont get me wrong in the pooring rain, very tight, very fast corners could be an issue, but it never felt dangerous. It is a very quick car and i regretted selling mine especially when i heard a week later the young lad that bought it from me had been caught doing over 100 in a 30 and would probably have to sell it! I am not biased as after the VXR I have had 2 Forester STI's, in fact bought the latest one last week, just love the sound and the feeling. That is one thing i would say, the VXR was like an Evo a little disengaged, i enjoyed it as it was fast, but the character of a scoob is so much more rewarding.
Was just on here to look at if anybody had spotted me and came across this, had to add a comment. I am TEACH on other forums in case anybody thinks i am a troll.
Old 11 May 2010, 07:43 PM
  #134  
zedder17
Scooby Regular
 
zedder17's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vava voom
sorry about the delay chaps.....i have ONLY ever run my car on shell optimax or tesco 99 ron never uk fuel so i dont imagine i have lost that much power, no expense is spared come service time.....and as for the astra he definatley had a some bits and bobs done under her skirt...he pulled away to quickley and to be fair it had a very nice roar to it to with lots of poping and banging going on......but to tell you truth, i would like to see another one pull up beside me because iam getting a lot of mixed views from this thread (which is great by the way gives me something intresting to read at work lol) but iam about 90% sure he's done some work to it.
100% sure its modded no roar or pops and bangs from my standard vxr !! its very quiet!!
Old 11 May 2010, 07:47 PM
  #135  
dan69royal
Scooby Regular
 
dan69royal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if anyone lives in the dundee area and fancies a blast in a vxr, give me a shout.
Old 11 May 2010, 07:55 PM
  #136  
paulbu
Scooby Regular
 
paulbu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by VXRBOY
The VXR is seriously quick in standard form and would batter a WRX hands down and was more than a challenge to an STI.
Show me any independent road test that shows that a standard VXR is faster throught the gears than any turbo charged Impreza produced in the past fifteen years. The VXR's 0-60 times in excess of 6 seconds and 0-100 times of around 16 seconds are really 2nd division stuff. Lets get in the real world.
Old 11 May 2010, 08:06 PM
  #137  
Tomwrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (54)
 
Tomwrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: irvine,ayrshire
Posts: 3,661
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

never been in any vxr, never raced any dont give a ****,

i think the vectra vxr is a nice car,love my scoob, but all cars have gd and bad points!! ,

but the comment below is from the vxr forum, why do some people talk complete and utter pish

"They think they are the quickest car in the world! I pulled away from a '56 plate WRX at the weekend in my astra diesel! He was very confused.. He thought it was a VXR until he realised they don't come in 5 door and it had a cloud of black smoke pouring out the back!"
Old 11 May 2010, 08:10 PM
  #138  
cossie_eater
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
cossie_eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: south east
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

most of this is what we deal with everyday. in the fact that everyone wants to race someone who drives an impreza.... we can drive normaly with out racing (Sometimes) lol
Old 11 May 2010, 08:11 PM
  #139  
VXRBOY
Scooby Regular
 
VXRBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by paulbu
Show me any independent road test that shows that a standard VXR is faster throught the gears than any turbo charged Impreza produced in the past fifteen years. The VXR's 0-60 times in excess of 6 seconds and 0-100 times of around 16 seconds are really 2nd division stuff. Lets get in the real world.
In the real world i have owned both and driven both hard as well as had a few run ins with the repspective others. take one out and see for yourself. But hey if you truly believe that there is no way a VXR could be as quick as a scoob, good luck to you.

Last edited by VXRBOY; 11 May 2010 at 08:13 PM.
Old 11 May 2010, 08:13 PM
  #140  
Peanuts
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Peanuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

PaulBu, grow up FFS.

Real world is not a magazine article showing that a VXR is quicker through the gears, real world is driver against driver on the road or track.
Your contradict yourself with gay abandon
Old 11 May 2010, 08:13 PM
  #141  
Peanuts
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Peanuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

double post, bladdy website!
Old 11 May 2010, 08:14 PM
  #142  
Voxer
Scooby Newbie
 
Voxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by paulbu
Show me any independent road test that shows that a standard VXR is faster throught the gears than any turbo charged Impreza produced in the past fifteen years. The VXR's 0-60 times in excess of 6 seconds and 0-100 times of around 16 seconds are really 2nd division stuff. Lets get in the real world.
That's a little ill informed to be honest.

The reason the Astra is rated at 6.2 sec to sixty and has 0-100 of around 15 sec is because it is FWD, this however gives no indication of how quick rolling in gear times are for the Astra.

The above is why 0-60 and 0-100 should not be used to compare how FWD cars will do against RWD or 4WD cars from rolling.

Once rolling FWD cars already have traction so they have no real deficit to make up and the advantage a 4WD car has is now gone.

Simple example:

A std WRX will beat a VXR 0-60 and 0-100 because it has better traction, however change the test to 30-150 and the WRX will look silly, partly because it won't get there(banter guys) and mostly because the VXR is at this stage putting the power on the tarmac.

The same goes for the Vectra, it is 0.1 faster to 60 than the Astra so will still get beat by a WRX getting there from a stand still, make it a rolling start though and the Vec will shake the scoob off the road as it roars past it and into the distance.

0-60 and 0-100 should not be used to evaluate what will happen if you meet a car on the open "cough" private "cough" roads.
























































p.s scoobs are still better in the twisties though so don't flame me.
Old 11 May 2010, 08:16 PM
  #143  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by paulbu
Show me any independent road test that shows that a standard VXR is faster throught the gears than any turbo charged Impreza produced in the past fifteen years. The VXR's 0-60 times in excess of 6 seconds and 0-100 times of around 16 seconds are really 2nd division stuff. Lets get in the real world.
Blinkers off please
Old 11 May 2010, 08:20 PM
  #144  
mit
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
mit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Peanuts
PaulBu, grow up FFS.

Real world is not a magazine article showing that a VXR is quicker through the gears, real world is driver against driver on the road or track.
Your contradict yourself with gay abandon
Old 11 May 2010, 08:22 PM
  #145  
VXRBOY
Scooby Regular
 
VXRBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

:
Originally Posted by Peanuts
PaulBu, grow up FFS.

Real world is not a magazine article showing that a VXR is quicker through the gears, real world is driver against driver on the road or track.
Your contradict yourself with gay abandon

I like the gay part
Old 11 May 2010, 08:22 PM
  #146  
StrikE
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
StrikE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Hilltop
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.vxronline.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=91777

LMAO send him to me & i will sort him out

Trashed a few of these silly cars now, anyone else like a try? [non scooby]
Old 11 May 2010, 08:22 PM
  #147  
Peanuts
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Peanuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

erm, may have dropped a ball.
could have said VXR or STI or WRX is quicker through the gears, but the sentiment is there..
Old 11 May 2010, 08:23 PM
  #148  
Peanuts
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Peanuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

double post, bladdy website
Old 11 May 2010, 08:24 PM
  #149  
mit
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
mit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What is the 30-130 time for a standard Impreza, an any guise? And the VXR's likewise?
Old 11 May 2010, 08:25 PM
  #150  
chris270181
Scooby Regular
 
chris270181's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: west yorks
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So what have we concluded? Once rolling the vxr is likely to be quicker than a scoob, top end speed the vxr will do more?
from a standing start the scoob will leave it for dead up to whatever speed? On the twists the vxr falls short again? So....... What happens from a standing start on the twists? the scoob wins.. Maybe subaru should release a sti vxr. Instead of the cosworth sti?


Quick Reply: ASTRA VXR!!! :(



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:05 AM.