Notices
Trader Announcements Announcements (including special offers, product/service information) made by Authorised Advertisers

scoobyclinics turbo's just got billet I mean better!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 10:03 PM
  #2371  
juggers's Avatar
juggers
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Hammer man
An excellent choice juggers
Cheers mate,now get those miles done and give us the results plz
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 10:04 PM
  #2372  
juggers's Avatar
juggers
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by TimH
Have we seen any results for a twinscroll SC46 on a 2.5? This thread is way to long to find anything lol
Tim you going for an SC?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2011 | 10:08 PM
  #2373  
TimH's Avatar
TimH
Orange Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 3
From: JT Innovations Ltd.
Default

Originally Posted by juggers
Tim you going for an SC?
I would be lying if I said it hadn't crossed my mind
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 10:00 AM
  #2374  
The Gaffer's Avatar
The Gaffer
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: www.scoobyclinic.com
Default

Originally Posted by happydude303
why could the engine not breath any more in what sence do you mean i.e heads or are we talking fmic or headers upipe them type of mods as my engine is a forged bottom end with standard version 4 heads but i do have full supportting mods

i may just have to drive my version 4 all the way to you guys and you can put on the 42 and see what happens and if i dont see 400- 410
then were chuck the 46 on

Hi,

standard bugeye wrx heads, forged bottom end but no work carried out on cams or head porting, lets not forget though it did do 399 BHP.

We would do the SC42 on your car, if its not what you require its no big deal to swap it out for a 46, the only restraint is time, the car may have to be here for a couple of days, we do have courtesy sheds FOC.

cheers
Kev
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 10:09 AM
  #2375  
The Gaffer's Avatar
The Gaffer
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: www.scoobyclinic.com
Default

Originally Posted by TimH
I would be lying if I said it hadn't crossed my mind
Hi,

there is one on the shelf with your name on it.

cheers
Kev
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 02:42 PM
  #2376  
The Gaffer's Avatar
The Gaffer
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: www.scoobyclinic.com
Default

Hi,

The very fact we have an ice driver weekend to give away, gave rise to our original idea of the purchase of a billet turbo giving free entry to a prize draw seem a little limited, so we have organised a sprint challenge at the newly re-surfaced Blyton Park raceway instead.

In association with JAVALIN trackday events it will take place on Sunday the 2nd of October 2011.

All makes and models will be welcome especially scoobs of course and Scoobyclinic tech staff will be in attendance to give technical assistance including mechanical and computer diag on the day.

The entry fee for competitors will be £125.00, spectators very welcome entry fee to be confirmed but we are pushing to make it free.

The private entry (non tuner) winner of the day receives this............








An adrenaline packed weekend in Sweden driving our ice driver scoob on the frozen lakes all expenses paid including accommodation and the flight.

This whole event will over the next few days evolve, we hope, and if successful we will run it next year as a sprint series, allowing owners of tuned cars to let their hair down with the possibility of a great prize, a prize better than any seen in other race series such as Time Attack or the nippon challenge etc.

A web page with details about the day and on-line entry for competitors should be live within a few days.

Any views are welcome please don't hesitate to call to book in or wait for the on-line booking to go live, let it evolve, lets test those Billets.

cheers
Kev
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 03:10 PM
  #2377  
juggers's Avatar
juggers
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3
Default

Kev any news on the delivery of the twinscroll?
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 03:12 PM
  #2378  
The Gaffer's Avatar
The Gaffer
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: www.scoobyclinic.com
Default

Originally Posted by juggers
Kev any news on the delivery of the twinscroll?

Hi,

its on its way should be here tomorrow or Monday, as soon as the order arrives I will be in touch to fire one straight out to you.

cheers
Kev
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 04:16 PM
  #2379  
juggers's Avatar
juggers
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,481
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by The Gaffer
Hi,

its on its way should be here tomorrow or Monday, as soon as the order arrives I will be in touch to fire one straight out to you.

cheers
Kev
Cheers Kev
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 09:21 AM
  #2380  
leeroywrx's Avatar
leeroywrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by The Gaffer
Hi,

the 42 will spool a little quicker and in some cases on a 2.0 ltr engine the SC46 can choke up at the top, adding more boost causes power to fall off, I stress "in only a few cases", hence the re-introduction of the SC42, and the fact that some people prefer the BB core to the sleeve bearing version.

As shown in an earlier post the SC42 did indeed out spool the MD321 H, made the same power and completely removed the customers problem of compressor surge, not a fair test for the turbo as the engine was maxed out and could not breath any more, therefore top end figures from either turbo were not conclusive.

Hope the above helps

cheers
Kev
i hope this isnt whats happening to mine kev
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 10:05 AM
  #2381  
The Gaffer's Avatar
The Gaffer
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: www.scoobyclinic.com
Default

Originally Posted by leeroywrx
i hope this isnt whats happening to mine kev
Hi,

yours hasn't been mapped to that point yet as the inlet pipe is collapsing on the dyno, there are a number of reasons why this doesn't happen on the road, for example air flow over the pipe will reduce its temperature making the silicon less pliable therefore less likely to collapse.

Once this issue is sorted we will see what happens when JGM carries out the final map.

Cheers
Kev
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 06:50 PM
  #2382  
happydude303's Avatar
happydude303
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
From: southampton
Default

leeroy wrx please put up the graphs as soon as you have them for the sc42

oh and woouldnt standard inlet plastic pipe be good enought as they dont suck shut
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 08:09 PM
  #2383  
leeroywrx's Avatar
leeroywrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 0
Default

I have an sc46 mate that made 378 bhp with similar torque at 1 bar but we think the inlet shut on the rollers.it makes 1.6 bar on the road though which is baffling me tbo
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 09:02 PM
  #2384  
chrisdicko's Avatar
chrisdicko
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 0
From: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Default

Could be wrong here, but I've read/been told the issue isn't the intake pipe, but the actual filter size! As the turbo is sucking so hard, and can't get enough air through the filter, obviously things will start to collapse!

I don't know if it's true, but definitely sounds right in theory!
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 09:25 PM
  #2385  
Hammer man's Avatar
Hammer man
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 1
From: Kenilworth
Default

Originally Posted by chrisdicko
Could be wrong here, but I've read/been told the issue isn't the intake pipe, but the actual filter size! As the turbo is sucking so hard, and can't get enough air through the filter, obviously things will start to collapse!

I don't know if it's true, but definitely sounds right in theory!
A filter by definition is something that is restrictive, so it must be true to some degree
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 09:33 PM
  #2386  
chrisdicko's Avatar
chrisdicko
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 0
From: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Default

inner wing filters are normally a cause of this, as they have to be small to fit in the wing obviously. I've now got a huge one in the engine bay
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 10:11 PM
  #2387  
leeroywrx's Avatar
leeroywrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 0
Default

its quiet a large rcm filter so im hoping it should be up to the job
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2011 | 10:20 PM
  #2388  
chrisdicko's Avatar
chrisdicko
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,016
Likes: 0
From: Whitby, North Yorkshire
Default

That's what I've been told though mate....if it was up to the job, the intake pipe won't collapse. I could be wrong though
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 01:45 AM
  #2389  
WhiteWagonMan's Avatar
WhiteWagonMan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
From: Trying to pull a 10 second 1/4 mile running a standard 2.0ltr engine...
Default

Does actually make sense when you think about the problem logically,the pipe only closes on the rolling road and not on the actual open road,air is restricted on the rollers as the car is static and the only air is that supplied by the fan,on the road the pipe doesnt shut as a huge volume of air is readily available aswell as being forced into the cold air feed as the car moves forward at speed.Also the silicone intake pipe will become much softer on the rollers due to the greater under bonnet temps thus allowing it to close easier than it would on the road where much colder air is being passed through it plus under bonnet temps will be much lower.This has been bothering me for days now lee and the comments made by chris above have finally lit a spark,i just hope great minds think alike as they say,im not saying my mind is one of them LOL,but im sure you get the jist.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 08:18 AM
  #2390  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Inket pipe will be effected by filter and by the rigidity of the pipe itself (which temls will effect).

If you treat the inlet pipe as a straw and stick you finger over the end inevitably it will suck shut, once that has happenned once it wilk happen easier again.

With regard to Lee's car if currently it only sucks the inlet pipe shut on the dyno the it wont be long before it does so on the road too.

378 @ 1bar is very positive sign that once issue with inlet pipe is sorted and it runs 1.6bar flat we should be nearer expected output.

Simon
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 09:06 AM
  #2391  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

From my experience, claims of the inlet pipe sucking shut are blamed on a host of other problems.
If you look at some of the Group "N" Subaru Rally Cars you will see they have a very soft rubber inlet tract and this is so they can be removed and refitted quickly when a turbo needs changing during an event. This obviates the need for lifting the manifold which is necessary with the OE hard plastic item. These rubber inlets are so soft you can squeeze them shut quite easily with just one hand.

For an inlet tract to suck shut there must be a depression, negative pressure difference or vacuum in the inlet tract and this is because of a blocked filter, dense filter material as in the STi panel or just not enough filter surface area.
Many cars that I see have inadequately sized filters.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 10:06 AM
  #2392  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default

Originally Posted by harvey
From my experience, claims of the inlet pipe sucking shut are blamed on a host of other problems.
If you look at some of the Group "N" Subaru Rally Cars you will see they have a very soft rubber inlet tract and this is so they can be removed and refitted quickly when a turbo needs changing during an event. This obviates the need for lifting the manifold which is necessary with the OE hard plastic item. These rubber inlets are so soft you can squeeze them shut quite easily with just one hand.

For an inlet tract to suck shut there must be a depression, negative pressure difference or vacuum in the inlet tract and this is because of a blocked filter, dense filter material as in the STi panel or just not enough filter surface area.
Many cars that I see have inadequately sized filters.
This may well be true Harvey, although I too have seen inlet pipes sucking shut, typically the Samco version which we no longer sell.
I had another one on Friday, fitted with a Billet wheeled 321T initial runs at actuator pressure of 1 bar seemed promising at 360bhp on 97 ron Esso fuel.
Turning the boost up of course started to see torque rise but the top end power would fall away and it wouldn't hold any more than a bar.
After various tests of actuator preload, boost solenoid tests and time beginning to run out, we did a quick 20% meth map and left it at 390bhp and 410lbft @ 1 bar boost as the owner was drag racing at a local 1/8th mile event the next day.
He came 2nd in class and 3rd overall with a 7.54 1/8th.

We have discussed with the owner of the car fitting a H + S twisted kit therefore removing the inlet tract from under the inlet manifold for good.
The filter on this car is an RCM cone that we have ran on cars at up to 700bhp, so I doubt that it is inadequate in this circumstance.

Martyn
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 10:13 AM
  #2393  
WhiteWagonMan's Avatar
WhiteWagonMan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
From: Trying to pull a 10 second 1/4 mile running a standard 2.0ltr engine...
Default

i have the largest of all the rcm filters fitted to my car so it will be quick and easy enough to fit it to lee`s when its next on the rollers,would be and easy fix if thats all it is,fingers crossed.
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 10:35 AM
  #2394  
zizouille's Avatar
zizouille
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: france
Default

How many cfm or lbs delivers SC42 and SC46 turbos ?
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 11:04 AM
  #2395  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Lee's filter is more than adequate. I wasnt there on dyno run but kev says pipe was shutting so have no reason to think otherwise.

Harvey,

Group n is around 78bhp less at same boost and runs a restrictor so the volume of air being sucked through the inlet pipe is very different.

Simon
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 12:52 PM
  #2396  
New_scooby_04's Avatar
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Default

Brings back memories. When Bob was putting the final map on my car post running in, the session had to be called off as the SC46 was collapsing the inlet pipe (an RCM item would you believe - must have been a duff one) this raised Bob and David's eyebrows somewhat. Went with a Perrin item in the end if that helps any?

Made a quite amusing sound as I recall!
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2011 | 01:51 PM
  #2397  
Turbovin's Avatar
Turbovin
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 678
Likes: 37
From: Sweden
Default

When will 3" piping to the filter become restrictive? I have modified my lower splash guard to sit lower so I can fit the biggest 9" AEM dryflow filter in the inner wing but the space in the inner wing makes an 4" inlet and piping to the filter inpossible so I have to use the 3" inch version.

I had a Saab with 421 hp with just 2,5" to the filter but that was probably on the limit.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2011 | 11:40 PM
  #2398  
WhiteWagonMan's Avatar
WhiteWagonMan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
From: Trying to pull a 10 second 1/4 mile running a standard 2.0ltr engine...
Default

Kev im coming to see you saturday afternoon,do you have the SC46 and SC42 in stock.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2011 | 12:30 AM
  #2399  
leo_sti's Avatar
leo_sti
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MartynJ
I had another one on Friday, fitted with a Billet wheeled 321T initial runs at actuator pressure of 1 bar seemed promising at 360bhp on 97 ron Esso fuel.

Martyn
Any thts Martyn on how this recomped turbo has performed ?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2011 | 07:23 AM
  #2400  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

Some of the above only confirms what I am saying. eg :
When will 3" piping to the filter become restrictive?
The pipe does not cause the restriction it is the filter.
The pipe collapses because the air pressure in the inlet tract is below the ambient /atmospheric air pressure and the vacum therefore "sucks in" the pipe. Over a relatively large surface area it does not take a lot of vacum to collapse a pipe.
I use a magnahelix guage to measure this depression.

Group n is around 78bhp less at same boost and runs a restrictor so the volume of air being sucked through the inlet pipe is very different.
That is exactly correct and the whole point I am making.

The fact it does not happen on a Gp N rally car with soft inlet tract and lower cfm consumption simply means the air filter on the GP N car is big enough to cause no signifigant depression.

The filter on this car is an RCM cone that we have ran on cars at up to 700bhp, so I doubt that it is inadequate in this circumstance.
A filter does not suddenly stop working. The pressure depression gradually increases as air flow increases. As a rule, the pressure depression will be a lot less at say .5 bar than at 2 bar boost pressure and reducing that depression with a bigger/better filter or better/straighter/shorter inlet tract reduces the work the turbo has to do as it does not have to overcome the depression. There is also substantially less chance of inlet tract collapse.

If you think any of the above is not correct, invest in magnahelix guages and do some experiments. The results may surprise you and they are useful for many other types of air flow and pressure investigations.

Some problems are blamed on collapsing inlet tracts when that is not the issue.

BTW, the silicon inlet tract sold by ScoobyClinic is excellent.

Last edited by harvey; Aug 16, 2011 at 07:29 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:10 PM.