Aren't you on the way back down though?

 

It's fair to say I won't be getting any taller.


I'm a bit chunkier than I'd like at the moment, but I really think that a proper bloke's build ought to be at least a stone, perhaps two, above the recommended BMI. Who writes that bollocks? Eh?

12 stone 6'1" blokes are only fit for modelling surfing clothing, inputting computer data, or looking like some effete kept bum-boy; not for doing proper physical labour .

 

Pale faced, long fingered, weak, office based underbiting shirt lifters, thats who.

If by magic.

 

LOL.

 

Rest assured, Nat. Only some choose to not talk about it as low self esteem doesn't feature in their lives.

 

I am quite fit. I'm in my mid forties, I run around 5k regularly, have a physical job and do a general weights routine a couple of times a week. Men over 18 years of age who fit the recommended BMI are skeletal, haggard shadows of men, not worthy of the name.

 

I think I owe Nat an apology, I made a few comments, go away for the weekend and pop back in and all hells broken lose! I must apologise for drawing attention to that rather sizeable ego!

+1 For Natteeboy

 

I hate it when you loose track after all hell has broken lose

 

So 6 foot one professional rugby players aren't fit at 16/17 stone then?

Lots of different shapes about and, whilst willowy 12 stoners might be very popular with habituees of the lavender avenue, it must be hell having to ask old ladies/small children to open jam jars, crisp packets, etc...

Now TelBoy here - he has a proper BMI

 

Exactly! Unless you're registering as morbidly obese you just aren't trying hard enough!!

 

Nat, I'm intrigued how you've even assumed I'm older than you?