Latest results S206 turbo
23 August 2009, 04:11 PM
#91
Had a passenger ride in Bill Sandhu classic Impreza wagon yesterday with the S206 turbo fitted,his basic spec is a built 2.5 litre, ppg gearbox, solaris ecu etc, Must say i was very impressed with this turbo, seemed to feel a lot smoother and hold boost across the rev range better compared to his previous GT30 which always seemed to feel like there was a bit of lag then a big dollop of boost and then tail off slightly(still made a very fast car), where as the S206 seemed to have a awesome spread of power and for a bigger turbo I didnt notice much turbo lag. Feels awesome now, quickest Impreza ive ever been in!!!!
23 August 2009, 10:36 PM
#92
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Had a passenger ride in Bill Sandhu classic Impreza wagon yesterday with the S206 turbo fitted,his basic spec is a built 2.5 litre, ppg gearbox, solaris ecu etc, Must say i was very impressed with this turbo, seemed to feel a lot smoother and hold boost across the rev range better compared to his previous GT30 which always seemed to feel like there was a bit of lag then a big dollop of boost and then tail off slightly(still made a very fast car), where as the S206 seemed to have a awesome spread of power and for a bigger turbo I didnt notice much turbo lag. Feels awesome now, quickest Impreza ive ever been in!!!!
25 August 2009, 02:39 PM
#100
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
26 August 2009, 07:34 PM
#102
Scooby Regular
26 August 2009, 10:36 PM
#103
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02 September 2009, 07:03 PM
#105
Scooby Regular
Further results on the S206 this morning. A customers car this time round with stock Sti4 heads and cams and an Enginetuner built 2.1 stroker.
02 September 2009, 09:35 PM
#108
Scooby Regular
02 September 2009, 09:59 PM
#109
A real 'straightforward' and relatively affordable way to get to around 480-520 (depending on mapped fuel choice).Martyn, if the motor was a built, 'normal' 1994cc displacement, but all supporting mods were exactly the same as that customer's - assuming any/all of them would also be suitable for the 2.0, of course - roughly what would it make on the same V-Power + 10% meth? How much less torque would it make, compared to the c.492lb ft of your 2.1?
Last edited by joz8968; 02 September 2009 at 10:32 PM.
02 September 2009, 10:51 PM
#110
Scooby Regular
As always, it is difficult to say with any degree of certainty.
We are doing one very shortly so should no for sure then but my best guess would be similar power, but 30-40lbft less torque based on the results we are seeing on the Evos.
We are also building an STi8 with a 2.1 stroker and S206 at the moment and I am really excited about seeing what we can do with another 400-500rpm of spool with the VVT.
We are doing one very shortly so should no for sure then but my best guess would be similar power, but 30-40lbft less torque based on the results we are seeing on the Evos.
We are also building an STi8 with a 2.1 stroker and S206 at the moment and I am really excited about seeing what we can do with another 400-500rpm of spool with the VVT.
03 September 2009, 01:10 PM
#112
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04 September 2009, 08:23 AM
#115
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As always, it is difficult to say with any degree of certainty.
We are doing one very shortly so should no for sure then but my best guess would be similar power, but 30-40lbft less torque based on the results we are seeing on the Evos.
We are also building an STi8 with a 2.1 stroker and S206 at the moment and I am really excited about seeing what we can do with another 400-500rpm of spool with the VVT.
We are doing one very shortly so should no for sure then but my best guess would be similar power, but 30-40lbft less torque based on the results we are seeing on the Evos.
We are also building an STi8 with a 2.1 stroker and S206 at the moment and I am really excited about seeing what we can do with another 400-500rpm of spool with the VVT.
06 September 2009, 07:30 PM
#117
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07 September 2009, 02:47 PM
#119
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Somewhere halfway between heaven and hell, some call it earth!
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seriously now, i'm deeply considering....
If i were to have the 2.1 with on my sti8 keeping my heads, the s206 turbo, how long would it take to build and how much all in all? (Parts + Labour + VAT)
PM if you like
If i were to have the 2.1 with on my sti8 keeping my heads, the s206 turbo, how long would it take to build and how much all in all? (Parts + Labour + VAT)
PM if you like
07 September 2009, 10:15 PM
#120
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts