Notices

Dawes AFR and connection of?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05 June 2002, 07:22 PM
  #91  
Katana
Scooby Regular
 
Katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: In a house
Posts: 5,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hehe, he sends stuff away as soon as he could. Wait a sec, what clear indicator group buy?
Old 06 June 2002, 10:15 AM
  #92  
Tone Loc
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Tone Loc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5,166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Katana YHM .

Probably get it in a weeks time tho, works e-mails seem to take for ever to be delivered!

Tony.
Old 06 June 2002, 10:33 AM
  #93  
Katana
Scooby Regular
 
Katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: In a house
Posts: 5,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

When I ordered my brake pads and MBC, it literally came the next day. But dueto my extreme laziness, the pads are still in the garage as is my cam belts.
Old 09 June 2002, 11:01 PM
  #94  
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Pavlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: home
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

<RAMBLE>
Might I suggest, that if you are getting hung up about grounding, that running a fairly chunky grounding wire direct from the battery -ve (negative) to the ECU ground.

It is entirely possible for the grounds to vary if there is a hint of resistance between them. And as soon as any current flows, it will flow around the whole circuit, ground and +ve line. In our case this will be the chassis, and any power feeds.

So when you put you lights on current will flow through the chassis, and the resistance will cause a voltage chage, one that will not be as noticeable at the battery terminal, (it will exist to an extent due to internal resistance in battery).

It is a common practice to use dedicated sensing lines when measuering voltage, in other words, you connect a seperate pair of wires direct to the source, and since voltage sensing equipment is high impedance (very low current draw) the high currents and resistances in the supply lines to the "thing" will not affect the voltage readings.

Eg, measure voltage at battery, measure voltage at alternator, there will be a little difference. So you would connect sensing probes direct to the alternator if you wanted to accurately measure *its* voltage.

Ground fluctuations would probably be more prevalent in older cars due to the affects of corrosion and oxidisation build up in joints in the body and wiring.
</RAMBLE>

Cheers

Paul
Old 03 July 2002, 10:04 PM
  #95  
paulwadams_my99
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
paulwadams_my99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post



right theres a pic of the install its a bit blurry but you get the idea. Just need to make sure its working . I was having a chat with T-UK and IanW last night and they suggested that my Lambda sensor may be failing? I need a select monitor run i think to tally up my afr readings. One thing though that was mentioned was the fact that my car idles quite low I reckon is about 500-550rpm. It always has though and doesn't feel lumpy so never thought about it. I am now lead to believe that this may be too low? Is it the Mafs job or the lambda to control idle, both or another sensor? Or am i barking up the wrong tree?

Cheers

Paul

[Edited by paulwadams_my99 - 3/7/2002 10:07:19 PM]
Old 03 July 2002, 10:17 PM
  #96  
paulwadams_my99
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
paulwadams_my99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I am half tempted to just buy a new lambda sensor from halfords and see if it makes a differnce. If it doesn't i'll just keep a spare. I wonder what the average shelf life is for one? Does anyone think i would have to remove the intercooler to fit? There isn't much room for a spanner.

The reason I think something is up is because on first WOT its 4th light then generally 3rd on WOT then sometimes 2nd on WOT, its just so inconsistent.

Cheers

Paul

[Edited by paulwadams_my99 - 3/7/2002 10:19:44 PM]
Old 03 September 2002, 10:27 PM
  #97  
paulwadams_my99
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
paulwadams_my99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Will it drain the power if there is no signal?

And fitted the dawes v impressive!

[Edited by paulwadams_my99 - 3/9/2002 10:28:25 PM]
Old 03 September 2002, 10:35 PM
  #98  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

y prob will be tiny though - measure it.

[Edited by john banks - 3/9/2002 10:36:14 PM]
Old 03 October 2002, 02:36 PM
  #99  
catflap
Scooby Regular
 
catflap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

hay paul, just fitted my afr, im geting same problam as you.

So ill rewore t as you have indicated above to see if its better.

You fused the live, dasft question, what fuse did you use?

Cheers

Are the lights suposed to stay lit all the time? as mine simply flash red every once n a while?

I also get a lot of red flashes driving around town (between 2000 and 3000 rpm, on the spool up?)

HELLLPPP !!!!!!


[Edited by catflap - 3/10/2002 3:24:04 PM]
Old 03 October 2002, 06:31 PM
  #100  
paulwadams_my99
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
paulwadams_my99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Otis, it sounds like you have got the wrong signal wire from the ecu. You wired it into the blue plug? Third wire from end middle row, its white with some silver dabs down it. It shouldn't stay on all the time. Little flickers at cruise and fully on on WOT.

I used a 2amp fuse for the live. Better than the 20amp one or whatever it is on the cigarette lighter. If you do wire to the live then u might aswell put a switch in whilst you do it for the reasons T-uk stated just in case you are going to leave the car for a long period. At least you know you have a true clean circuit. I think Dawes says you can pick up the live from anywhere but hes very insistent that you earth at battery.

cheers Paul

[Edited by paulwadams_my99 - 3/10/2002 6:45:44 PM]
Old 03 October 2002, 09:19 PM
  #101  
paulwadams_my99
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
paulwadams_my99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

John,

the closer you are to the battery on both the earth and the live the less varaition in demand u will see. I agree with what u r saying dont get me wrong and this will work perfectly if u are always presented with a good earth. If anything affects the lamda earth then both the eliments will work incorrectly. By going to the battery u will always know that your equipment is measuring correctly. By connecting to the lambda eart u are adding more power loss at that point,I squared r, going to the battery eliminates any downgrading performance at the lambda eath. In theroy to the ecu ground is fine providing the earth connection has zero resistance. Over a period of time this may degrade. Do u see what i am saying. I am not arguing for the sake of arguing. But therotically its best always to go back to the battery. If it was practical to do so manafactures would take all electrical earths to the battery but its not. Then people wouldnt get dodgy lights etc due to bad earths.

Cheers

Paul.

P.S. i have been doing my research and also have an electrical engineer friend


[Edited by paulwadams_my99 - 3/10/2002 9:31:41 PM]
Old 03 October 2002, 09:38 PM
  #102  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

I am not arguing as well trying to understand the technicalities, especially of a circuit which is virtually identical to the one I designed. I want to know WHY I am wrong, otherwise I won't be convinced.

For every sensor I want to read I want to know what that sensor is doing relative to its earth, so for analogue ground I will use sensor earth wherever possible, not another earth which may have an offset. The measuring device to measure a proportional difference should also use the same earth. But I can see what you mean about degrading an earth further by using it as a supply.

Are you forgetting that the LM3914N has an integrated precision reference which means that within a very broad range of supply voltages (including fluctuations) it will read correctly? Hence I really want to know what the sensor is producing, not the sensor +- any offsets in its ground compared with the battery. I care not what the ground is relative to battery ground, all I want to know is what that sensor is doing relative to its own ground. If that ground moves then fine. The signal will still be relative to its own ground.

Am I missing something?

Oh, BTW, nothing more I like than arguing with engineers I learn more that way, sometimes I am right, sometimes they are.

In principle if the sensor could be grounded at the battery that would be very nice, but since it isn't I want the sensor ground?

If there is a 5mV (variable) offset between the sensor ground and the battery ground because of resistance, then the signal I read from my circuit will also be affected by this offset. The only way to remove this is to read from the sensor ground. Engineer or not this is pure logic?

[Edited by john banks - 3/10/2002 9:46:37 PM]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimBowen
ICE
5
02 July 2023 01:54 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
Raptorman
ScoobyNet General
0
01 October 2015 06:46 PM
mistermexican
General Technical
2
01 October 2015 04:30 PM
TECHNOPUG
General Technical
11
21 September 2015 05:42 PM



Quick Reply: Dawes AFR and connection of?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:22 AM.