Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

March against child poverty

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06 October 2008, 09:26 AM
  #61  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Netherlands is 5
Old 06 October 2008, 09:28 AM
  #62  
cookstar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
cookstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stroke it baby!
Posts: 33,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its a shame in a way that "teenage pregnancy" carries such a stigma, both my boys mum and myself were teenagers when we had him.
Old 06 October 2008, 09:50 AM
  #63  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
Well the US has a considerably higher rate, and women there get **** all - So that's that theory out the window
I said Europe, afaik the USA is not in Europe.
Old 06 October 2008, 10:01 AM
  #64  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Deep Singh
I said Europe, afaik the USA is not in Europe.
I dont think you can seperate it out - You can deal in the western hemisphere, the US has less welfare ( and lower taxes) and a higher Teenage pregnancy rate. France has better welfare (and higher taxes) and a lower Teenage pregnancy rate.


Which sort of goes completely against your theory of people doing it for the money.
Old 06 October 2008, 10:19 AM
  #65  
unclebuck
Scooby Regular
 
unclebuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by Deep Singh
Right wing? .
Don't worry that's what he accuses everyone of being.

Apparently his foaming at the mouth ranting is the only 'balanced' opinion on Scoobynet.
Old 06 October 2008, 10:32 AM
  #66  
ahar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
ahar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Near Watford
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I love threads like this....

One of the few groups of people who get to see all the different people who claim benefits are those that work in Job Centres and other related government offices. Go and ask them what they think - it's enlightening!

PS I've spent 5 years working with exactly those people, have been in Job Centres etc. I've found that the people I speak to see it as 50/50. Lots of scroungers but also lots of people for whom the system really does work as its supposed to.
Old 06 October 2008, 12:39 PM
  #67  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ahar
I love threads like this....

One of the few groups of people who get to see all the different people who claim benefits are those that work in Job Centres and other related government offices. Go and ask them what they think - it's enlightening!

PS I've spent 5 years working with exactly those people, have been in Job Centres etc. I've found that the people I speak to see it as 50/50. Lots of scroungers but also lots of people for whom the system really does work as its supposed to.
Ok from the horse's mouth then. Ahar thinks 50% are scroungers, which is a far cry from the 'minority' that Pete Brant thinks it is
Old 06 October 2008, 12:43 PM
  #68  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Perhaps we should all take a visit to the job centre and benefits office to get a first hand idea.
The coal face of the welfare system!
Old 06 October 2008, 01:17 PM
  #69  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Deep Singh
Ok from the horse's mouth then. Ahar thinks 50% are scroungers, which is a far cry from the 'minority' that Pete Brant thinks it is
Its anecdotal! not proof!
Old 06 October 2008, 02:05 PM
  #70  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by unclebuck
Don't worry that's what he accuses everyone of being.

Apparently his foaming at the mouth ranting is the only 'balanced' opinion on Scoobynet.
How you've got the neck to accuse anyone of 'ranting and foaming at the mouth'.....
Old 06 October 2008, 02:27 PM
  #71  
Luan Pra bang
Scooby Regular
 
Luan Pra bang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The trouble is that the basic cost of living makes it a bad idea for many single parents to work. When it becomes more realisitic for more single parents to work then a little bit of help from the state may encourage people to work more. Personally I would look to trial a system where by free child care was offered on the basis that parents did not get any benefits at all but then had the option of going to work. At least decent child care could guarantee 2 decent meals a day.
I do get annoyed with the number of single parents who still manage to get drunk and buy a gram of coke every friday and saturday night. My local has a fair few and I cannot help but think their drug and beer money could be better spent else where. I now drive a crap car, wear old clothes and spend next to no money on myself as current circumstances mean this would change how good a life I give for my son. This does not upset me I feel lucky that I can make sacrifces for my son and am happy to do so. What does annoy me is women who seem to think children are an unwanted accesory to be dumped on the grandparents so they get get drunk and take drugs.
Old 06 October 2008, 02:45 PM
  #72  
fivetide
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
fivetide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 3,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Kind of a key point there Luan.

What is poverty? £10 a day is it? As said, with rent paid etc that isn't bad at all. Look at all the African aid schemes, what is the solution to poverty? Education.

Every child and i mean every child has access to education in this country. If the parents were any good then they would encourage their kids to take the opportunity that in all likelyhood they rejected. Lets be honest very few of those on benefits are university or even a level educated are they yet they had the chance and threw it away.

Even then, some people will always have more than others, unless we resurrect communism and everyone really is given exactly the same things by the governemtn there will always be the haves and the have not. someone will always make up the bottom rung.

IMHO a child with a roof over its head, food on the table (which parents could provide cheaply if they make the effort) and access to education and a loving home environment is not in poverty whether they have the latest trainers/ipod/playstation etc etc or not.

5t.
Old 06 October 2008, 04:43 PM
  #73  
Luan Pra bang
Scooby Regular
 
Luan Pra bang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The USA and the UK are lucky poor people still have acess to medical care tv's education and cars. All around the world whole families live in homes smaller than my living room. I may moan about politicians all of the time but at hte end of the day its still pretty good to be jobless in the UK the only major problem is that mentally people struggle when they have no work to do.
Old 06 October 2008, 05:14 PM
  #74  
Deep Singh
Scooby Regular
 
Deep Singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
Its anecdotal! not proof!
We are not trying to prove the existence of sub atomic particles, ie something we cannot see

Why do you insist on some sort of graph or statistic, when we can all see what is going on around us?

You must be a very annoying person to have a drink with if whenever someone has a difference of opinion to yours you demand a randomised, controlled, double blinded study to back it up!
Old 06 October 2008, 06:16 PM
  #75  
Norman D. Landing
Scooby Regular
 
Norman D. Landing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

/Homer

"It's funny because it's true!"
Old 06 October 2008, 08:49 PM
  #76  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Deep Singh
We are not trying to prove the existence of sub atomic particles, ie something we cannot see

Why do you insist on some sort of graph or statistic, when we can all see what is going on around us?
How do you see it? Do people on benefits have big neon signs above their heads? Do they tell you explicitly "Hi, I'm Dave, and I'm on benefits" when you meet them?

I mean, how are you deciding which people are, and are not on benefits?

And from that, how are you deducing that 50% of all people on benefits are on the take?
Originally Posted by Deep Singh
You must be a very annoying person to have a drink with if whenever someone has a difference of opinion to yours you demand a randomised, controlled, double blinded study to back it up!
I probably would if I talked politics when I go out for a drink, but thats not going to happen

Also, they would probably take me to one side and sort me out if I did
Old 06 October 2008, 11:01 PM
  #77  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

NOT
Is there supposed to be any point to your posts?
All you seem to do is involve yourself with, shall we say "rabid" posts and not the ones that are more validly argued.
It is as though you are not interested with the subject of the thread as much as with point scoring.
I think the subject matter is more worthy than you appear to think it is.
Old 07 October 2008, 09:03 AM
  #78  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cster
NOT
Is there supposed to be any point to your posts?
All you seem to do is involve yourself with, shall we say "rabid" posts and not the ones that are more validly argued.
It is as though you are not interested with the subject of the thread as much as with point scoring.
I think the subject matter is more worthy than you appear to think it is.
Oh the irony
Old 07 October 2008, 10:45 AM
  #79  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
And from that, how are you deducing that 50% of all people on benefits are on the take?
Well actually ALL of the people on benefits are on the take, otherwise they wouldn't be on benefits.
Old 07 October 2008, 11:15 AM
  #80  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There was a time when it was considered to be essential to support yourself in work. Most people had a feeling of shame if they were unable to do this and would go to great lengths to get a job, of any kind if necessary. Most would not have a child deliberately if they felt they could not afford it at the time or were not married.

It is an indication of how attitudes have changed now. I wonder what is best, should we all show more moral resonsibility over these matters.

Les
Old 07 October 2008, 11:28 AM
  #81  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OllyK
Well actually ALL of the people on benefits are on the take, otherwise they wouldn't be on benefits.
Well yes, in the literal sense, but of course I was referring to fraudulent claims.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeeDee
Subaru
18
04 March 2020 07:10 PM
Frizzle-Dee
Essex Subaru Owners Club
13
01 December 2015 09:37 AM
LostUser
Non Scooby Related
11
29 September 2015 11:00 AM
lozgti1
Non Scooby Related
33
20 September 2015 01:03 AM
Luke
ScoobyNet General
35
12 February 2001 04:14 PM



Quick Reply: March against child poverty



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:02 AM.