Same sex fostering is OK then?
28 June 2006, 03:43 PM
#211
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: --------------------
Posts: 13,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
Just catching up with this thread. I know most points have been dealt with, but was this comment actually posted in all seriousness? I'm literally staggered. I won't even begin asking on what basis the "opinion" was formed.
Les, you have huge issues accepting that some humans aren't biologically heterosexual, don't you? It isn't a big percentage, granted, but it's *a* percentage. You are confusing unnatural and abnormal with remarkable ease.
Les, you have huge issues accepting that some humans aren't biologically heterosexual, don't you? It isn't a big percentage, granted, but it's *a* percentage. You are confusing unnatural and abnormal with remarkable ease.
"
28 June 2006, 03:54 PM
#216
BANNED
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: --------------------
Posts: 13,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Diablo
LOL, no, it was an advert for gay and lesbian wedding rings 
manufactured from a rare ****,fish,and petroleum jelly resistant alloy
28 June 2006, 08:06 PM
#217
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Diablo
That's an easy question to answer.
Another teaser for Leslie and the "it's God's punishment for unnaturalness".
Why was it (1985-1995) that a very significant proportion of herion users in Edinburgh are HIV positive and yet with the same amount of usage in Glasgow the level of HIV is massively lower in this group?
Does that mean God just doesn't like Edinburgh (all Weegies please keep schtum at this point
) or might there be a rationale explaination based on FACTS!!! In context!!!Rannoch
28 June 2006, 08:31 PM
#218
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: A stones throw from Canal Street - very handy!!
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lets get one thing straight here (or not as the case may be ) there is nothing wrong with same sex relationships. Has anyone tried it? Exactly, don't knock it if you haven't tried it 
Sex with a man is no different to with a woman in my experience as far as satisfaction is concerned. I won't go into detail on a family website but sex with a bloke is much better because you know exactly when your partner is excited
Similarly there is no "faking it" 
I will never go with woman ever again (I only tried it once didn't like it
)
We all walk this earth, live and let live
) there is nothing wrong with same sex relationships. Has anyone tried it? Exactly, don't knock it if you haven't tried it Sex with a man is no different to with a woman in my experience as far as satisfaction is concerned. I won't go into detail on a family website but sex with a bloke is much better because you know exactly when your partner is excited
Similarly there is no "faking it" I will never go with woman ever again (I only tried it once didn't like it
)We all walk this earth, live and let live
28 June 2006, 08:51 PM
#219
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 1998
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt
it's just somebody's opinion f1_fan, which he is entitled to have..........
Originally Posted by Leslie
**** sex is not natural.
I said that unnatural practices in nature are dangerous, and that also extends to other ways of interfering with the natural way of things.
I said that unnatural practices in nature are dangerous, and that also extends to other ways of interfering with the natural way of things.
1) Rape (including gang rape) amongst creatures in the animal kingdom is well documented, and was almost certainly prevalent in our own human ancestors. Given this activity can inherently aid an individual's chances of procreation it's rather difficult to argue that this act is/was unnatural. Given it's natural origins, does this mean that rape is therefore acceptable in your eyes?
2) Childbirth in countries without the quality of medicine we enjoy in the west can be many orders of magnitude more likely to lead to the death of the mother. However I doubt you would classify 21st century western medicine as natural. Or would you?
Looking forward to your reply.
Gary.
28 June 2006, 09:26 PM
#220
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I have ad blocked my rep - so dont waste your time!
Posts: 1,548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GCollier
Looking forward to your reply.
Gary.
29 June 2006, 01:19 PM
#221
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anne Robinson,
I do not believe that homosexuality is not part of the particular person's makeup. In fact I think it is probably so in most cases. Please do not make assumptions in the way I think about the subject. Does not alter the way I personally feel about **** sex though. Tell me, do you think that I dislike a person because they are homosexual? I have never said that nor mocked them either as some do on this forum. Perhaps you should read my posts more closely.
Rannoch, I have to say that you are absolutely right, I am not getting my share-of **** sex, none in fact! How about you though?
Les
I do not believe that homosexuality is not part of the particular person's makeup. In fact I think it is probably so in most cases. Please do not make assumptions in the way I think about the subject. Does not alter the way I personally feel about **** sex though. Tell me, do you think that I dislike a person because they are homosexual? I have never said that nor mocked them either as some do on this forum. Perhaps you should read my posts more closely.
Rannoch, I have to say that you are absolutely right, I am not getting my share-of **** sex, none in fact! How about you though?
Les
29 June 2006, 01:26 PM
#222
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Leslie
Anne Robinson,
I do not believe that homosexuality is not part of the particular person's makeup. In fact I think it is probably so in most cases. Please do not make assumptions in the way I think about the subject. Does not alter the way I personally feel about **** sex though. Tell me, do you think that I dislike a person because they are homosexual? I have never said that nor mocked them either as some do on this forum. Perhaps you should read my posts more closely.
Rannoch, I have to say that you are absolutely right, I am not getting my share-of **** sex, none in fact! How about you though?
Les
I do not believe that homosexuality is not part of the particular person's makeup. In fact I think it is probably so in most cases. Please do not make assumptions in the way I think about the subject. Does not alter the way I personally feel about **** sex though. Tell me, do you think that I dislike a person because they are homosexual? I have never said that nor mocked them either as some do on this forum. Perhaps you should read my posts more closely.
Rannoch, I have to say that you are absolutely right, I am not getting my share-of **** sex, none in fact! How about you though?
Les
There appears to be a group of carpet munching (AR) bum bandito's (the rest) posting some rather disturbing Pro-Paedo-Homo related tripe on here lately.....
When thay aren't forming a homo 'daisy chain' with each other they appear to be baiting you?
All homo's ARE sick, twisted, pervert scum kiddy abusers.... and don't let ANY PC keyboard bum poker tell you otherwise.......
29 June 2006, 01:34 PM
#223
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Les,
Don't patronise, I don't need to read anything "more closely". But let's look at what you've said. In one breath, that homosexuality can be part of a person's make-up, ie a natural state. In the next breath, that **** sex is not natural. So which is it to be? You might not like the use of the word contradiction, but from where I'm sitting, the hypocrisy is glaringly obvious.
What I think you want to say is that whilst you begrudgingly accept homosexuality as part of modern society, the very thought of two men "getting it on" in the bedroom repulses you, and this is what's clouding your judgment on the subject. Which is all fair enough, but it does make me wonder why you're posting with anything approaching an authoritative tone on this thread. I'd like to think that we *do* agree that homosexuality in no way makes a person more likely to have paedophilic tendencies, given your good relationship with several gay friends, which is after all what this thread is all about.
Don't patronise, I don't need to read anything "more closely". But let's look at what you've said. In one breath, that homosexuality can be part of a person's make-up, ie a natural state. In the next breath, that **** sex is not natural. So which is it to be? You might not like the use of the word contradiction, but from where I'm sitting, the hypocrisy is glaringly obvious.
What I think you want to say is that whilst you begrudgingly accept homosexuality as part of modern society, the very thought of two men "getting it on" in the bedroom repulses you, and this is what's clouding your judgment on the subject. Which is all fair enough, but it does make me wonder why you're posting with anything approaching an authoritative tone on this thread. I'd like to think that we *do* agree that homosexuality in no way makes a person more likely to have paedophilic tendencies, given your good relationship with several gay friends, which is after all what this thread is all about.
29 June 2006, 01:39 PM
#224
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
Les,
Don't patronise, I don't need to read anything "more closely". But let's look at what you've said. In one breath, that homosexuality can be part of a person's make-up, ie a natural state. In the next breath, that **** sex is not natural. So which is it to be? You might not like the use of the word contradiction, but from where I'm sitting, the hypocrisy is glaringly obvious.
What I think you want to say is that whilst you begrudgingly accept homosexuality as part of modern society, the very thought of two men "getting it on" in the bedroom repulses you, and this is what's clouding your judgment on the subject. Which is all fair enough, but it does make me wonder why you're posting with anything approaching an authoritative tone on this thread. I'd like to think that we *do* agree that homosexuality in no way makes a person more likely to have paedophilic tendencies, given your good relationship with several gay friends, which is after all what this thread is all about.
Don't patronise, I don't need to read anything "more closely". But let's look at what you've said. In one breath, that homosexuality can be part of a person's make-up, ie a natural state. In the next breath, that **** sex is not natural. So which is it to be? You might not like the use of the word contradiction, but from where I'm sitting, the hypocrisy is glaringly obvious.
What I think you want to say is that whilst you begrudgingly accept homosexuality as part of modern society, the very thought of two men "getting it on" in the bedroom repulses you, and this is what's clouding your judgment on the subject. Which is all fair enough, but it does make me wonder why you're posting with anything approaching an authoritative tone on this thread. I'd like to think that we *do* agree that homosexuality in no way makes a person more likely to have paedophilic tendencies, given your good relationship with several gay friends, which is after all what this thread is all about.
Wow wish I could be as clever as you (without the **** bit).................
You are a FREAK LADY........
29 June 2006, 01:39 PM
#225
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by davegtt
I dont agree with Gay Parents fostering or having children but I dont see how this can be used in defence of that opinion, straight people can be just as twisted and abuse children....
IMO off course
IMO off course
29 June 2006, 01:44 PM
#227
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by image doctor
I was brought up by a couple of poofs...and there's fukc all up with me, where's me handbag henry.
29 June 2006, 01:45 PM
#228
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh lord................... The PC brigade are out (of the closet again).....
Last edited by DCI Gene Hunt; 29 June 2006 at 01:48 PM.
29 June 2006, 01:46 PM
#229
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt
Oh lord................... The PC brigade are out (of the closet again).....
PC I most certainly am not.
29 June 2006, 01:57 PM
#230
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The land of Daisies and Bubbles!
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DCI - editing your posts to try and look less silly after someone points out you were in such a hurry to post another 'anti PC/ gay' message that you didn't read their original post properly? 
Does that mean you've not really read any of the other posts on the thread....?
Does that mean you've not really read any of the other posts on the thread....?
29 June 2006, 02:07 PM
#231
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sad when a proportion of a thread has to be conducted via PM to avoid being ruined by the utterly gob****e comments of a no-mark troll, but there you go. Thank you for your comments, Les, I think we can consider the matter closed.
29 June 2006, 02:11 PM
#232
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drunken Bungle *****
DCI - editing your posts to try and look less silly after someone points out you were in such a hurry to post another 'anti PC/ gay' message that you didn't read their original post properly?
Does that mean you've not really read any of the other posts on the thread....?
Does that mean you've not really read any of the other posts on the thread....?
29 June 2006, 02:13 PM
#233
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt
I'm a feckin Troll!!! I don't have time to read EVERYTHING.... sometimes I just assume.... It's not easy being a troll ya know...
29 June 2006, 02:17 PM
#237
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nathanb
DCI you need to get out more......
437 posts this month which equates to nearly 19 a day!!!
Thats just wrong....
437 posts this month which equates to nearly 19 a day!!!
Thats just wrong....
29 June 2006, 09:03 PM
#239
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: A stones throw from Canal Street - very handy!!
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt
Like my ****-hole to bummers.............
29 June 2006, 09:33 PM
#240
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
homosexuality in no way makes a person more likely to have paedophilic tendencies, which is after all what this thread is all about.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/5109518.stm
http://www.leedstoday.net/ViewArticl...icleID=1493527
and that ain't never going to change.