agree, it's a well known fact that Pygmy chimps of south america bum each other vigoursly when they can't get any Poontang

LOL @ the advert below

gulf hurricane relief?

LOL, no, it was an advert for gay and lesbian wedding rings

or wedding rings for the deaf?

"Take your ring off, it's hurting "

" I don't wear rings, that's my wristwatch "

manufactured from a rare ****,fish,and petroleum jelly resistant alloy

I know it is an easy question to answer - if you are clear thinking and lucid

Another teaser for Leslie and the "it's God's punishment for unnaturalness".

Why was it (1985-1995) that a very significant proportion of herion users in Edinburgh are HIV positive and yet with the same amount of usage in Glasgow the level of HIV is massively lower in this group?

Does that mean God just doesn't like Edinburgh (all Weegies please keep schtum at this point ) or might there be a rationale explaination based on FACTS!!! In context!!!

Rannoch

Lets get one thing straight here (or not as the case may be ) there is nothing wrong with same sex relationships. Has anyone tried it? Exactly, don't knock it if you haven't tried it

Sex with a man is no different to with a woman in my experience as far as satisfaction is concerned. I won't go into detail on a family website but sex with a bloke is much better because you know exactly when your partner is excited Similarly there is no "faking it"

I will never go with woman ever again (I only tried it once didn't like it )

We all walk this earth, live and let live

And as I said before, no one is "entitled" to an opinion which cannot be supported by evidence. Holding such an opinion places you on the same level as someone who believes things such as god is talking to them through their microwave oven.

Let me draw your attention to another fallacy you are labouring under - that of labelling "natural" activities as good/acceptable and "unnatural" activities as "evil/unacceptable/dangerous". If you think for a few seconds I hope you are able to think of many examples yourself where your (flawed) associations don't hold true, but let me give you a couple which you can try to refute.

1) Rape (including gang rape) amongst creatures in the animal kingdom is well documented, and was almost certainly prevalent in our own human ancestors. Given this activity can inherently aid an individual's chances of procreation it's rather difficult to argue that this act is/was unnatural. Given it's natural origins, does this mean that rape is therefore acceptable in your eyes?

2) Childbirth in countries without the quality of medicine we enjoy in the west can be many orders of magnitude more likely to lead to the death of the mother. However I doubt you would classify 21st century western medicine as natural. Or would you?

Looking forward to your reply.

Gary.

Good luck.....i'm still waiting to hear how many times he's said "get off woman....you can't suck it...thats not natural to wacko"

Anne Robinson,

I do not believe that homosexuality is not part of the particular person's makeup. In fact I think it is probably so in most cases. Please do not make assumptions in the way I think about the subject. Does not alter the way I personally feel about **** sex though. Tell me, do you think that I dislike a person because they are homosexual? I have never said that nor mocked them either as some do on this forum. Perhaps you should read my posts more closely.

Rannoch, I have to say that you are absolutely right, I am not getting my share-of **** sex, none in fact! How about you though?

Les

Chill Les.....

There appears to be a group of carpet munching (AR) bum bandito's (the rest) posting some rather disturbing Pro-Paedo-Homo related tripe on here lately.....

When thay aren't forming a homo 'daisy chain' with each other they appear to be baiting you?

All homo's ARE sick, twisted, pervert scum kiddy abusers.... and don't let ANY PC keyboard bum poker tell you otherwise.......

Les,

Don't patronise, I don't need to read anything "more closely". But let's look at what you've said. In one breath, that homosexuality can be part of a person's make-up, ie a natural state. In the next breath, that **** sex is not natural. So which is it to be? You might not like the use of the word contradiction, but from where I'm sitting, the hypocrisy is glaringly obvious.

What I think you want to say is that whilst you begrudgingly accept homosexuality as part of modern society, the very thought of two men "getting it on" in the bedroom repulses you, and this is what's clouding your judgment on the subject. Which is all fair enough, but it does make me wonder why you're posting with anything approaching an authoritative tone on this thread. I'd like to think that we *do* agree that homosexuality in no way makes a person more likely to have paedophilic tendencies, given your good relationship with several gay friends, which is after all what this thread is all about.

It's the dyke again...... **** ME YOU'VE GOT ***** LADY (Pun intended) you are so dam clever and highly educated that you spend your time discussing the wrongs and rights of Homo's taking it up the ****!!.......................

Wow wish I could be as clever as you (without the **** bit).................

You are a FREAK LADY........

Here here.

I was brought up by a couple of poofs...and there's fukc all up with me.

Oh lord................... The PC brigade are out (of the closet again).....

Read, very carefully, what I was "here-here'ing" to. I do NOT agree with same sex couples bringing up/having children.

PC I most certainly am not.

DCI - editing your posts to try and look less silly after someone points out you were in such a hurry to post another 'anti PC/ gay' message that you didn't read their original post properly?

Does that mean you've not really read any of the other posts on the thread....?

Sad when a proportion of a thread has to be conducted via PM to avoid being ruined by the utterly gob****e comments of a no-mark troll, but there you go. Thank you for your comments, Les, I think we can consider the matter closed.

I'm a feckin Troll!!! I don't have time to read EVERYTHING.... sometimes I just assume.... It's not easy being a troll ya know...

Obviously it's alot easier being one very bored individual.

Like my ****-hole to bummers.............

DCI you need to get out more......
437 posts this month which equates to nearly 19 a day!!!

Thats just wrong....

That's assuming I'm one person

Ok Anne, thanks for that.

Les

**** off back to your slime pit you parasite

Just to go full circle. The evidence (which you and GC are so keen on) still says otherwise:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/5109518.stm

http://www.leedstoday.net/ViewArticl...icleID=1493527

and that ain't never going to change.