Same sex fostering is OK then?
23 June 2006, 12:22 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Same sex fostering is OK then?
Just returning to this issue for those that see no harm in the idea:
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthrea...light=adoption
because we are now seeing the true results of this crazy Politically Correct policy....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/5109518.stm
http://www.leedstoday.net/ViewArticl...icleID=1493527
Nice... 
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthrea...light=adoption
because we are now seeing the true results of this crazy Politically Correct policy....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/5109518.stm
http://www.leedstoday.net/ViewArticl...icleID=1493527
A BOY told a jury of the harrowing times he claims his gay foster parents abused him.
Ian Wathey, 40, and his lover Craig Faunch, 32, are alleged to have carried out a catalogue of abuse on four vulnerable boys aged between eight and 14 placed in their care between February 2004 and January 2005.
Ian Wathey, 40, and his lover Craig Faunch, 32, are alleged to have carried out a catalogue of abuse on four vulnerable boys aged between eight and 14 placed in their care between February 2004 and January 2005.
23 June 2006, 12:24 PM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not that I'm saying that it's right or wrong for same sex fostering, but hetrosexual parents still abuse the child in some cases.
Unfortunately it's the nature of a sicko person, be they straight, gay, white, green, red, yellow, etc.
Unfortunately it's the nature of a sicko person, be they straight, gay, white, green, red, yellow, etc.
23 June 2006, 12:30 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unclebuck
Just returning to this issue for those that see no harm in the idea:
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthrea...light=adoption
because we are now seeing the true results of this crazy Politically Correct policy....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/5109518.stm
http://www.leedstoday.net/ViewArticl...icleID=1493527
Nice...
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthrea...light=adoption
because we are now seeing the true results of this crazy Politically Correct policy....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bradford/5109518.stm
http://www.leedstoday.net/ViewArticl...icleID=1493527
Nice...
Proof
I think all gay people should be flogged for even thinking about children never mind fostering them or abusing them.
What is this country coming to - I wonder. I think I will go and live somewhere else with my head firmly in a bucket of sand.
Rannoch
23 June 2006, 12:36 PM
#7
Originally Posted by Rannoch
I think I will go and live somewhere else with my head firmly in a bucket of sand.
Trending Topics
23 June 2006, 12:43 PM
#8
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont agree with Gay Parents fostering or having children but I dont see how this can be used in defence of that opinion, straight people can be just as twisted and abuse children....
IMO off course
IMO off course
23 June 2006, 12:49 PM
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I have ad blocked my rep - so dont waste your time!
Posts: 1,548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
reminds me of The Office where Garath is trying to work out the farmer/fox/chicken riddle and asks where the framers wife is, when its suggested the farmer is gay he say "well then he shouldnt be around animals"
seems some people on this forum have a similar mentality!
seems some people on this forum have a similar mentality!
23 June 2006, 12:51 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So all those who think what's happened is OK will be happy to see their children fostered with a pair of gays then?
I suppose if you rely on Ricky Gervais for your moral values anything's possible.
I suppose if you rely on Ricky Gervais for your moral values anything's possible.
23 June 2006, 12:56 PM
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're missing the point again, UB. You are assuming this happended *because* they are gay, which is frankly ridiculous. But like many topics, once you've decided on your opinion, nothing will change it. You have no time for gay people, and that's that. QED.
23 June 2006, 01:06 PM
#12
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
You're missing the point again, UB. You are assuming this happended *because* they are gay, which is frankly ridiculous. But like many topics, once you've decided on your opinion, nothing will change it. You have no time for gay people, and that's that. QED.
23 June 2006, 01:06 PM
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tellins, Home of Super Leagues finest, and where a "split" is not all it seems.
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by davegtt
I dont agree with Gay Parents fostering or having children but I dont see how this can be used in defence of that opinion, straight people can be just as twisted and abuse children....
IMO off course
IMO off course
23 June 2006, 01:08 PM
#14
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Errrr Fred & Rose West ringing any bells?..................Straight couple they were 
But hey it's Obviously the GAYS........ lets get 'em!...........
But hey it's Obviously the GAYS........ lets get 'em!...........
23 June 2006, 01:09 PM
#15
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The rarefied atmosphere.
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good god, the depths of depravity are truly being plumbed.
Homosexuality and child abuse are unnatural deviances. Perversions of nature. The difference between them is that fudge nudging is legal and child abuse isn't. They put children with deviants and this is what happens. Scourge.
Homosexuality and child abuse are unnatural deviances. Perversions of nature. The difference between them is that fudge nudging is legal and child abuse isn't. They put children with deviants and this is what happens. Scourge.
23 June 2006, 01:22 PM
#17
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The rarefied atmosphere.
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
How little you've ever bothered to read about homosexuality, Eddie. 
You just tell me, son, what could I read about homosexuality that can possibly override the God given fact that ***** were meant for cr4pping?
23 June 2006, 01:27 PM
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not saying you're lacking, Eddie, just that you're unable and unwilling to grasp the simple fact that it isn't a state of choice for the vast majority of humans, and presumably the entirety of the animal kingdom that display homosexual behaviour, which they do. But bringing it down to the level of the function of the sphincter is easier I suppose.
23 June 2006, 01:38 PM
#20
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The rarefied atmosphere.
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
Not saying you're lacking, Eddie, just that you're unable and unwilling to grasp the simple fact that it isn't a state of choice for the vast majority of humans, and presumably the entirety of the animal kingdom that display homosexual behaviour, which they do. But bringing it down to the level of the function of the sphincter is easier I suppose.
Both acts are a deviation from nature. If they can't resist one why should they be expected to resist the other?
Contemptible.
23 June 2006, 01:44 PM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Anne Robinson
Not saying you're lacking, Eddie, just that you're unable and unwilling to grasp the simple fact that it isn't a state of choice for the vast majority of humans, and presumably the entirety of the animal kingdom that display homosexual behaviour, which they do. But bringing it down to the level of the function of the sphincter is easier I suppose.
Secondly, it was the *gay foster parents* who brought things down to *the level of the function of the sphincter * which is why they have now been put away.
Sorry, if someone wants to *love* someone of the same sex that's fine. But don't try to argue that it is the *norm* or that we should confer the same status on *same sex* couples as heterosexual couples i.e. the norm!
Dave
23 June 2006, 01:49 PM
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The land of Daisies and Bubbles!
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OMG you're right - they're gay so therefore they must be paedophiles! 
Did you also know that the vast majority of people who rape women are also men? Therefore they must also all be rapists! 
Sweeping generalisations based on one news story - that's what I love NSR for.....
These guys are sick b@st@rds - not because they're gay, but because they are child abusers.
As already stated there are, sadly, many hetrosexual child abusers in the world. Gay paedophiles may abuse young boys, straight paedophiles may abuse young girls.
I still believe that your sexual orientation should not, on it's own, preclude you from adopting/ fostering. Incredibly thorough checks should be carried out on anyone who wants to adopt or foster to prevent this sort of thing happening.
Did you also know that the vast majority of people who rape women are also men? Therefore they must also all be rapists! Sweeping generalisations based on one news story - that's what I love NSR for.....These guys are sick b@st@rds - not because they're gay, but because they are child abusers.
As already stated there are, sadly, many hetrosexual child abusers in the world. Gay paedophiles may abuse young boys, straight paedophiles may abuse young girls.
I still believe that your sexual orientation should not, on it's own, preclude you from adopting/ fostering. Incredibly thorough checks should be carried out on anyone who wants to adopt or foster to prevent this sort of thing happening.
23 June 2006, 01:51 PM
#23
Oh for Gods sake!
I am a heterosexual male and I sleep with women (one woman these days). This does not mean I am predisposed to shoving my todger into young girls. Similarly being a gay male does not indicate a predisposition to shoving todgers into young male children.
However agreeing with the likes of Unclebuck on this matter just because this one couple happen to be gay and perverted b@stards does indicate a predisposition to being a muppet.
My wife and I have a number of gay friends, in particular a male couple that live together with two children from one of the friends previous marriage. These children now both in their late teens are both in heterosexual relationships and are both among the happiest most emotionally rounded individuals I have ever met.
Being gay is no indication that a person is a kiddy fiddler.
Someone choosing a name that means everyone has to call them Uncle something on the other hand is deeply suspicious
I am a heterosexual male and I sleep with women (one woman these days). This does not mean I am predisposed to shoving my todger into young girls. Similarly being a gay male does not indicate a predisposition to shoving todgers into young male children.
However agreeing with the likes of Unclebuck on this matter just because this one couple happen to be gay and perverted b@stards does indicate a predisposition to being a muppet.
My wife and I have a number of gay friends, in particular a male couple that live together with two children from one of the friends previous marriage. These children now both in their late teens are both in heterosexual relationships and are both among the happiest most emotionally rounded individuals I have ever met.
Being gay is no indication that a person is a kiddy fiddler.
Someone choosing a name that means everyone has to call them Uncle something on the other hand is deeply suspicious
23 June 2006, 01:52 PM
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The land of Daisies and Bubbles!
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by hutton_d
Firstly, please pass on the facts about homosexuality in the animal kingdom.
As requested. Hope that helps.
23 June 2006, 01:57 PM
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 4,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Eddie Temple
You just tell me, son, what could I read about homosexuality that can possibly override the God given fact that ***** were meant for cr4pping?
As for AR saying the 'entirety' of the animal kingdom is homosexual, what bollox! Someone 'may' have identified a couple of queer monkeys and all of sudden the whole kingdom is gay? No, I dont think so. And so what if they are? Monkeys dont go around wearing any clothes, **** where they like and pick their ***** so with your theory if its natural in the animal kingdom then its ok for homosapiens to do likewise?
23 June 2006, 01:57 PM
#26
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by magepaster
Someone choosing a name that means everyone has to call them Uncle something on the other hand is deeply suspicious
Back on topic the Judge made a very clear statement that this was not a case about homosexuality but a case of the breaking of trust. This is compounded by the fact that the social services had already seen photographic evidence of abuse that they then failed to follow up on appropriately!!
23 June 2006, 01:58 PM
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by hutton_d
Firstly, please pass on the facts about homosexuality in the animal kingdom.
Secondly, it was the *gay foster parents* who brought things down to *the level of the function of the sphincter * which is why they have now been put away.
Sorry, if someone wants to *love* someone of the same sex that's fine. But don't try to argue that it is the *norm* or that we should confer the same status on *same sex* couples as heterosexual couples i.e. the norm!
Dave
Secondly, it was the *gay foster parents* who brought things down to *the level of the function of the sphincter * which is why they have now been put away.
Sorry, if someone wants to *love* someone of the same sex that's fine. But don't try to argue that it is the *norm* or that we should confer the same status on *same sex* couples as heterosexual couples i.e. the norm!
Dave
2. I'm not saying it's the norm, read what I've posted. I've said it's not a state of sexuality of choice. You don't *learn* to be homosexual. But I will defend the accusation that this sort of behaviour occurred *because* they are gay to the end. It's truly horrific that it happened of course, but let's not use it as an axcuse to re-hash all of the ignorant anti-gay ****e this site sometimes displays.
23 June 2006, 02:00 PM
#28
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GaryK
Monkeys dont go around wearing any clothes, **** where they like and pick their ***** so with your theory if its natural in the animal kingdom then its ok for homosapiens to do likewise?
(I know I am being football supporterist
)
23 June 2006, 02:04 PM
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: somewhere big, expensive and exclusive
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GaryK
PMSL
As for AR saying the 'entirety' of the animal kingdom is homosexual, what bollox! Someone 'may' have identified a couple of queer monkeys and all of sudden the whole kingdom is gay? No, I dont think so. And so what if they are? Monkeys dont go around wearing any clothes, **** where they like and pick their ***** so with your theory if its natural in the animal kingdom then its ok for homosapiens to do likewise?
As for AR saying the 'entirety' of the animal kingdom is homosexual, what bollox! Someone 'may' have identified a couple of queer monkeys and all of sudden the whole kingdom is gay? No, I dont think so. And so what if they are? Monkeys dont go around wearing any clothes, **** where they like and pick their ***** so with your theory if its natural in the animal kingdom then its ok for homosapiens to do likewise?
23 June 2006, 02:05 PM
#30
BANNED
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: www.flamingmorons.co.uk
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unclebuck
Just returning to this issue for those that see no harm in the idea:
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthrea...light=adoption
http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthrea...light=adoption