You really are a f*cked up self important snob aren't you?

Do you really believe *anyone* gives even the tiniest turd what a pathetic PC nobheaded boarderline loony like you has to say about anything?


Dream on...

 

A father watched his young daughter playing in the garden. He smiled as he reflected on how sweet and pure his little girl was. Tears formed in his eyes as he thought about her seeing the wonders of nature through such innocent eyes. Suddenly she just stopped and stared at the ground. He went over to her to see what work of God had captured her attention. He noticed she was looking at two spiders mating. "Daddy, what are those two spiders doing?" she asked "They're mating," her father replied "What do you call the spider on top?" she asked. "That's a Daddy Longlegs," her father answered. "So, the other one is a Mommy Longlegs?" the little girl asked. As his heart soared with the joy of such a cute and innocent question he replied "No dear. Both of them are Daddy Longlegs." The little girl, looking a little puzzled, thought for a moment.........then took her foot and stomped them flat and said, "Well, we're not having any of that gay **** in our garden."

 

Well since you took the time to read and reply, you clearly do

I simply like facts, reason, rational argument and eloquence. I.e. traits which are the antithesis of those expounded by a prejudiced, hypocritical, bigoted intellectual deadweight such as yourself.

Gary.

 

I know. Don't get your panty hose in a twist over it though.

It's hard to mince when your hose is all twisted up.

 

Uncleschmuck must all of your posts follow the same old tiresome formula of:
a) post some contraversial link along with some bigoted bullet-head "analysis"
b) accuse anyone who doesn't agree with your prejudiced tripe of political correctness, NL sympathies or being a ********.

Is this really the best you can come up with? Have you actually posted anything which contains the tiniest fragment of reasoned argument as opposed to the low-grade uneducated boll*cks which has become your hallmark? I'm happy to have a reasoned debate with you, but you're simply not up to it - my 3 year old's rocking horse has more going on in its head than you. Having a battle of wits with an unarmed man has never been more relevant than when hitting the reply button to one of your posts.

And Leslie, what's it to be?
a) You agree that homosexual acts are widespread in nature, and are therefore natural in accordance with OED definition? (Therefore you retract your previous statements about such acts being unnatural.)
b) You have a different meaning for the word natural based on your own prejudiced beliefs which have no rational basis? (Therefore you retract your statement about agreeing with OED definition).
c) You claim to believe in OED definition AND that homosexual acts are unnatural, and therefore have an incoherent belief system which lies somewhere between irrationality and all out schizophrenia?

(And BTW there is no other logical space for your belief system to occupy, sorry).

Gary.

 

GCollier,

Your last post is completely inexplicable, you say I have retracted my statement about the fact that **** sex by homsexuals is an unnatural act which I certainly have not done. My understanding of the word natural" is exactly what I said, ie the OED definition. Neither have I agreed that **** sex is in any way natural whether performed by animals or humans. Your final sentence in fact appears to contradict what you said in the earlier ones.

I think you ought to remove your head from your own **** or whichever one it happens to be up at the time and sort out your own rationality!

Les

 

I alaways think the stock fallback argument 'monkeys and giraffes do it' is poor.

This thread seems way off the original discussion now though.

 

Although sometimes I find the thought of animal sex somewhat arousing!...........

 

Leslie - a, b and c are mutually exclusive choices, one of which must reflect your own beliefs. If I've made it too complex for you then let me spell it out with the sort of elementary logic that a child at junior school would understand.

You maintain your understanding of the word "natural" is in accordance with the OED definition, i.e. "existing in or caused by nature".

Homosexual acts exist in or are caused by nature - they've been observed in over 450 species of vertebrate.

Therefore homosexual acts are natural.

Continued belief in the OED definition of "natural" AND homosexual sex being unnatural is therefore not a logically coherent position. However it is indicative of a troubled state of mind, more extreme cases of which could be branded as schizophrenia.

Gary.