Novice DIY 2.5 build
Dyney,
i have fitted my link with the 550cc injectors and tuned it with a laptop to the point were it is very smooth to drive with no knock and has a perfect idle and cold start.
i would like to know what your master is set at and your first few fuel zones as my master needed to be very high ( 108 ) just to get it to run on the factory map. the funny thing is is that it only needed a master or 94 for it to run on the 440's witch seems backwards to my? the first few fuel zones on mine are around 102-103.
fuel pressure at idle is 2.9bar with vac line on and 3.6bar with it off. r33gtr fuel pump
for anyone how dosn't know this is for a ver3 sti with a ej257 swap and a 6row link.
if you don't have this information then thats fine. i would just like some coments from somone on why 550's would need a higher master than 440's.
i have fitted my link with the 550cc injectors and tuned it with a laptop to the point were it is very smooth to drive with no knock and has a perfect idle and cold start.
i would like to know what your master is set at and your first few fuel zones as my master needed to be very high ( 108 ) just to get it to run on the factory map. the funny thing is is that it only needed a master or 94 for it to run on the 440's witch seems backwards to my? the first few fuel zones on mine are around 102-103.
fuel pressure at idle is 2.9bar with vac line on and 3.6bar with it off. r33gtr fuel pump
for anyone how dosn't know this is for a ver3 sti with a ej257 swap and a 6row link.
if you don't have this information then thats fine. i would just like some coments from somone on why 550's would need a higher master than 440's.
no it doesnt Andy. which is why no one seems to have / worry about lag times 
not sure what Iains master is set at, as we couldnt get the laptop connected now the things got the right chip in
so there is something wrong there.
i've seen Link maps for similar cars where the settings are almost at opposites. i.e. low master, high cell values , and , high master and low cell values.
not sure which is the better way round, but susspect both work, but 1 (or neither) are smoother / more gradual.

not sure what Iains master is set at, as we couldnt get the laptop connected now the things got the right chip in
so there is something wrong there.i've seen Link maps for similar cars where the settings are almost at opposites. i.e. low master, high cell values , and , high master and low cell values.
not sure which is the better way round, but susspect both work, but 1 (or neither) are smoother / more gradual.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
I could modify a pipe if required.. if pipe was supplied with a permanent marker, mark where required.
thanks guys.
i didn't think about lag time. they are 550cc rx7 end feed so they arn't that flash but they were free. i just did a flow test on one and got 570cc/min but this was at 3.5bar as the engine wasn't running.
i didn't think about lag time. they are 550cc rx7 end feed so they arn't that flash but they were free. i just did a flow test on one and got 570cc/min but this was at 3.5bar as the engine wasn't running.
megrac,
Sorry wasn't about yesterday.
Some figures for you from my running in map
Fuel pressure is 3bar with the vac line on. Inj's are 550 Denso's from an RX7
0, Clamp =28
1, Master =39
10, Idle =21
Fuel Zone:
100 =41
105 =41
110 =41
115 =40
120 =42
200 =42
205 =39
210 =39
215 =35
220 =35
Sorry wasn't about yesterday.
Some figures for you from my running in map

Fuel pressure is 3bar with the vac line on. Inj's are 550 Denso's from an RX7
0, Clamp =28
1, Master =39
10, Idle =21
Fuel Zone:
100 =41
105 =41
110 =41
115 =40
120 =42
200 =42
205 =39
210 =39
215 =35
220 =35
Will double check the figures tomorrow.
Those figure were of the running in map.
I noted them down quite late at night and I still don't really understand what it all means
but I'am learning thanks to Pat
Those figure were of the running in map.
I noted them down quite late at night and I still don't really understand what it all means

but I'am learning thanks to Pat
the number in your first map look strange because they are from a non pclink compatible chip(the older one) were all the numbers were limited from 1-99.
i've booked mine in to get tuned in two weeks so we will see what happens and i'll share all when its done
i've booked mine in to get tuned in two weeks so we will see what happens and i'll share all when its done
Piece of P mark, if your unsure, just follow the destructions.
http://206.13.93.15/STi_Stuff/STi_Manual/02.%20ENGINE%20SECTION%20(STi)/04.%20MECHANICAL/15.%20Timing%20Belt%20Assembly.pdf
http://206.13.93.15/STi_Stuff/STi_Manual/02.%20ENGINE%20SECTION%20(STi)/04.%20MECHANICAL/15.%20Timing%20Belt%20Assembly.pdf
Originally Posted by AndrewC
An upgrade to the 'Q' chip...
unless its the serial link thats naffed......
anyone got a PDA to talk to a LINK yet ? and 'dash' (i.e. gauges) type software out there ?
Steve
Last edited by ScoobyDuck; Feb 10, 2005 at 07:15 PM.
steve, Iain's got my old serial link hasnt he? think so.
Was working 100% when i had it, although i used a serial to usb converter cable for my laptop.
I do remember trying to connect my latop to Tims Link and failed miserably, yet it hooked up to mine straight away.
You got the com ports set correctly within windows and within the link software?
You tried connecting to a 10 row link?
Steven
Was working 100% when i had it, although i used a serial to usb converter cable for my laptop.
I do remember trying to connect my latop to Tims Link and failed miserably, yet it hooked up to mine straight away.
You got the com ports set correctly within windows and within the link software?
You tried connecting to a 10 row link?
Steven



Very impressed!!