Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

Disappointing RR results.....NOT!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 11:03 PM
  #151  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Post

Back lunch time for turkey stuffing etc
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2003 | 11:40 PM
  #152  
R19KET's Avatar
R19KET
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Post

Andy,

I agree Sam, there is no 'secret mod' with regard to any turbo specs as far as I'm concerned, just some suppliers would like to think so
Says who Sam ? I've never been one to follow the flock
Couldn't agree more

This is a good link to what a ported shroud can do, if I can work out how to post it Page 71.

http://www.gikturbo.se/turbokompresorer.pdf

It's a shame that the GT series ported shroud covers, won't fit the GT series BB turbo's, but this can be got around.

Mark. Edited to add page no. and yippee, it worked

[Edited by R19KET - 12/18/2003 11:43:05 PM]
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 12:37 AM
  #153  
Sam Elassar's Avatar
Sam Elassar
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Post

Sam, Your right..

I have one on my turbo, in fact I have since I purchased the turbo way back


so what turbo are you using ? what specs? why did you actually need to run one?

Says who Sam ? I've never been one to follow the flock

that is why i said they can vary ,


agree with you there, no such a thing as a secret tuning method anymore. the knowledge is out there, and it is up to people to find it. end of the day results speak volumes.


sam
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 07:32 AM
  #154  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Smile

end of the day results speak volumes
So how long will we have to wait to actually see your 1/4 mile and top speed results Sam
Rolling road print outs are.....well....we don't believe them do we

Andy
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 07:49 AM
  #155  
Scoty's Avatar
Scoty
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,056
Likes: 0
Question

Guys, how much ignition advance woould be used "roughly" here to produce those figures?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 09:30 AM
  #156  
EMS's Avatar
EMS
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Post

Let me guess: 20° midrange to 26° @ 6000?

Mark.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 04:17 PM
  #157  
AlanG's Avatar
AlanG
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Cool

I´m back in the UK between xmas and New Year if you want to meet up Andy.
I haven`t seen the PS cover yet. Would be interesting to see it.

Alan

Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 06:58 PM
  #158  
Scoty's Avatar
Scoty
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,056
Likes: 0
Post

Cheers Mark,

I've been following Alan's progress over the last year and more, and I now have a very similar spec'ed UK car to Alans. (sorry for the highjack mate )
Alan has already said to me my car has the potential to produce v similar results, but when speaking to the guy who is mapping my car tomorrrow, he said he would map optimum AFR and 1.5 degrees of safe advance!!!!
I dont profess to knowing everything, but 1.5 degrees?
Will the car not run sh*te?
I remember Sam mapped it on the Link last year and we ran about 30 degrees?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 07:21 PM
  #159  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post

He probably means he will pull it back 1.5 degrees from the detonation threshold.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 07:37 PM
  #160  
Scoty's Avatar
Scoty
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,056
Likes: 0
Cool

ROTF

OK John cheers, told you I dont know much
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 02:36 PM
  #161  
Sam Elassar's Avatar
Sam Elassar
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Post

So how long will we have to wait to actually see your 1/4 mile and top speed results Sam
Rolling road print outs are.....well....we don't believe them do we

Andy


i should have more power than my rolling road print outs so i do agree with you that i don't believe them.


will probably do few events with teh car once the weather is better and i have sorted out my tyre/grip issue


Reply
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 02:42 PM
  #162  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Thumbs up

Nice one Sam. I'm genuinely keen to see how your car goes now

I'll be up in Dundee on 4th Jan if you're free then ? Can have a look at that manifold issue we discussed and you can scare me with a whirl in it

Andy
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2003 | 05:52 PM
  #163  
Sam Elassar's Avatar
Sam Elassar
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Post

i am away as of tomorrow and will not be back till the 7th. i am sure we will catch up at some point re that manifold. probably do some ap22 logging as well
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2003 | 04:02 PM
  #164  
AlanG's Avatar
AlanG
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Post

Andy

Did you not get my mail?

Alan
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 02:28 PM
  #165  
T-uk's Avatar
T-uk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
From: uk
Question

alan, took this from the project thread and just wondered if you could clear something up.

I'm happy the way it's running now. And it's not solely because i'm using one of "Andy's turbos"...

you specced a turbo and it took almost two years of wrongly specced units and failures before switching to andy's 20g, which as I understood it, has produced the goods and been reliable to date.

obviously you need the supporting mods to run the power you have regardless of turbo.

what other changes where made to your car between the other suppliers last turbo and the 20g? I am assuming that other performance changes were made between the two, if it is not solely down to finding the correct turbo.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 02:45 PM
  #166  
AlanG's Avatar
AlanG
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Post

Hi John
The main change that's been made to the car between the two has been taking boost control away from the Link ECU and using the Apexi with its own solenoid and map sensor.
There may not have been great amounts of difference in ultimate outputs between the turbo's but the way the car responds now "on the road" is quite remarkably different.

However, it's unfair to compare the two, as the earlier one didn't have its map optimised when it went on the rollers. It's easy to say things like "ah well because it wasn't optimised there must have been more to come" and "the only reason the cars better now is because of better boost control" is a load of mince.

They are very very similar units with one having benefits over the other and vice versa. It comes down to "pays ya money and makes yer choice".
I've already been open about what i think of them both in the other thread.

Alan
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 03:30 PM
  #167  
T-uk's Avatar
T-uk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
From: uk
Smile

thanks alan,

did not know a boost controller had also been added
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frizzle-Dee
Essex Subaru Owners Club
13
Dec 1, 2015 09:37 AM
Mister:E
In Car Entertainment For Sale
0
Sep 21, 2015 06:29 PM
matt12
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
4
Sep 14, 2015 09:36 AM
jwhitton
General Technical
23
Sep 29, 2000 07:16 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:35 AM.