Notices
Projects For Serious DIY Car Projects

Daily driver 2.4 or 2.5 project - target 450 BHP/400lbft reliable

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 12:23 AM
  #811  
AlanG's Avatar
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Default

What diameter is the turbo inlet John?

You want to try my inlet pipe for fitment?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 10:02 AM
  #812  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

76mm. Just heard they have now got the turbo seated though, raising the top of the uppipe would be troublesome to get the inlet pipe in.

They have 76mm hose to sleeve over my old MRT inlet hose, will see how it goes.

I think if I knew what I knew now I would have tried to shoehorn bigger wheels into the 05/06 hybrid, but the iON should be good once running I think on this engine at "sensible" boost - ie 1.2 to 1.3 bar.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 10:57 AM
  #813  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Default

1.5 bar
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 11:35 AM
  #814  
The Fixer's Avatar
The Fixer
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Default

Then 2.0 bar
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 11:49 AM
  #815  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

John:
If it helps you I will send further photos tonight. This time the adaptor I made for the P450 to inlet tract.
Also you can get a blank flange from Ian @ H+S to sit on top of existing up-pipe flange with blank holes and then use longer new studs to get a little more height.
I suspect your up-pipe is in a slightly different position as I had no fitting problems other than cutting out most of one lug as you have seen.
Obviously I felt the results more than compensated for the little extra effort.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 12:36 PM
  #816  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Thanks Harvey, further photos would be interesting, hopefully (again) it may be done by tonight though.

I think 1.2 or 1.3 bar at 6-7000 RPM should be quite good fun, after all this is comparable in airflow to 1.8 bar on 2.0!
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 12:44 PM
  #817  
AlanG's Avatar
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Default

after all this is comparable in airflow to 1.8 bar on 2.0!
Hmmm...

P450...1.8bar...2.0....who does that remind me of?

Has the potential to go well above your target of 450BHP then John?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 01:11 PM
  #818  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default



I'll have to turn the boost down in that case, can't really sensibly be going over 450 BHP with these pistons

Wife will kill me if I break anything, and that prospect is even scarier than T-uk giving me a hard time for running everything on the "bawsacking edge"
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 02:34 PM
  #819  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

So you will be try ing a little bit more boost soon then John......... LMFAO.
P.S. The turbo has the ability to run a 2.5 at 1.8 bar plus very easily so it could be spectacular in performance terms, even just to try short term.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 04:07 PM
  #820  
dowser's Avatar
dowser
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
From: Zurich, Switzerland
Default

"even just to try short term" - that's a slippery slope

Richard
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 09:15 PM
  #821  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Seems to be running nicely. I've not mapped it yet, just running it off the MAF sensor on the old map and all is behaving nicely, it will probably take a bit more timing from the looks of things, or rather ahem, less octane

Very smooth, runs 1.4 bar off the actuator alone and holds flat. Quite nice driving it off acutator only boost control as the spool up is very smooth and doesn't upset traction as much as the kidney punch method. Also helps keeping it pointing the right way.

It does spool up later than the 20G so that 1 bar is reached at about 2900 RPM in 6th gear, 3000 RPM in 5th. There is no surge or creep, I was a little surprised that with the actuator on its loosest setting it was running 1.4 bar, I had ahem planned to run a little less. Never mind, it doesn't seem to mind running that

I estimate about 460 BHP and 430 lbft in present trim from the butt dyno. We'll have to see.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 09:36 PM
  #822  
Wonder Wagon's Avatar
Wonder Wagon
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,235
Likes: 0
From: Being hunted down and killed one by one
Default

its looking good then john

when mapped how much more torque do you think you will get??
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 10:04 PM
  #823  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Not a lot, the only thing that needs altering is the ignition, fuelling is fine off the MAF sensor - just holds flat at about lambda 0.8 with the methanol as it did on the 20G with no daft lean spots or significant funny business. You would normally need to take 5 degrees off to lose the methanol which I intend to do with the new turbo, a small drop in fuel pressure of about 0.5 bar should see about 0.78 lambda when I lose the methanol. Because the new turbo isn't stressed to bawsack, I won't need to take the whole 5 degrees out to lose the methanol. I will probably get back anything I lose when I sort the induction kit out.

I will sort it roughly first off the MAF sensor, then steal the values and finally map the conversion box, remove the MAF sensor and restrictive APS induction and fit and box off the big K&N cone.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 11:16 PM
  #824  
Wonder Wagon's Avatar
Wonder Wagon
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,235
Likes: 0
From: Being hunted down and killed one by one
Default

have you got any pics?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 09:00 AM
  #825  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

No sorry no pics, will try to sort at some point.

Filled a virtually empty tank (56 litres in) with plain Optimax this morning and found that apart from a sparkle at 6000 RPM it will actually take the same timing it did on the 10% methanol mixture. At 6000 it will need 2-3 degrees less, it just ramps a little too early, perhaps also the EGBP is going up here as well, plus the intake gets real restrictive here too. Timing is 18 midrange, 25 at the top. Boost is 1.4 mid, 1.27 at the top. Losing the methanol hasn't spoilt the car's performance anything like it did before, probably because the turbo is having an easier time.

This was running a rich 0.74 lambda so that can be leaned out a bit when I check the EGTs.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 12:32 PM
  #826  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Default

what revs are you making 1.4bar ?

Do you use the ecu's boost control?

David
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 02:53 PM
  #827  
WREXY's Avatar
WREXY
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,833
Likes: 0
From: Greece, previously Syd Australia
Default

Good work John. Glad it's finally sorted. The ignition timing sounds close to my car 19/20 mid and 25 up top.

So the 06 should be coming my way soon a gather then?
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 05:35 PM
  #828  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

Pleased to hear the performance of the Ion Turbo is in line with your expectations although I would never have recommended it if I had not been 100% confident.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 06:19 PM
  #829  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

David, 3200 RPM in top. I was using no boost control - just a straight pipe from the compressor outlet to the actuator.

George - yes indeed, I am getting everything together. Drop me an email and we'll sort out the arrangements.

Harvey, yes it is good.

T-uk and I were playing a bit with it today. On Optimax with no additives I can now get the same power as I was running before with methanol With 1 or 2 PSI extra it runs 356 WHP and 364 WTq on Delta Dash.

For comparision, previous 434 BHP at Star compared with 340 WHP, so I should be about on the money for 450 BHP now, at which it all feels comfortable.

Tried using a Dawes and the torque comes in about 100 RPM earlier than with just the actuator and is more aggressive.

Overall it lags the 20G's torque by 400 RPM.

I have not remeasured, but I think there will be a hell of a depression in that inlet now with the APS still on it.

With all the other issues apparently sorted, I now need to ditch it and finish my conversion which may allow me to drop the boost slightly I hope to reach my targets at 1.4 bar mid dropping to 1.25 bar at the top rather than 1.4 bar at the top to presently get about 450 BHP.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 01:54 PM
  #830  
WREXY's Avatar
WREXY
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,833
Likes: 0
From: Greece, previously Syd Australia
Default

Email on the way.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 08:55 PM
  #831  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

JECS now running properly without MAF sensor and mostly mapped now - I didn't reflash the ECU at all, I just programmed the conversion box with VE. Working on the transients from 2000-3000 RPM, otherwise it is sorted.

Big filter will probably go on tomorrow and we'll see how much it frees things up. More heat wrapping to do. Coolant bypassed from throttle also.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2004 | 10:49 PM
  #832  
P20SPD's Avatar
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
From: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Default

Nice one John
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 11:39 PM
  #833  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Big filter and MAF removal make no difference to power - within 1% of before! It didn't make it leaner at the same boost but it does sound less strained. Perhaps it will allow more boost, or perhaps I have wasted my time

I could take 5% fuel out to get it back where it was before, but there is no more timing to add on plain Optimax at peak power (resisting Scottimax ). I could and will do a lot more heat insulation around the intake, turbine housing etc, but they are small details not big power adders.

I am running 1.3 bar at 6000 RPM at about peak power, if it will run 1.4 bar efficiently I think it will do about 450 BHP ish, but there isn't really a lot more to come without funny fuel out of this setup I don't think.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 02:57 PM
  #834  
The Fixer's Avatar
The Fixer
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,881
Likes: 0
Default

Looks like its time to run Harvey Boost On the P450
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 07:18 PM
  #835  
Bob Rawle's Avatar
Bob Rawle
Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 3,938
Likes: 1
From: Swindon
Default

Not on a std EJ257 short block !!!

John since all you are doing is applying a different method of picking a map point ( not denegrating what you have achieved here) then you surely could not expect to get more power from the same map values iyswim.

bob
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 07:48 PM
  #836  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

I was expecting more power from freeing up the restriction caused by the APS cold air kit and its cast elbow though? Running on speed density I expected that when it was removed it would go a bit leaner as the turbo wouldn't be working as hard for the same inlet manifold pressure because there would be less drop in the inlet.

I boxed in the filter today, but I still had to run more boost to get 360 WHP on Delta Dash. Don't want to resort to NF or Scottimax just yet
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 11:14 PM
  #837  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Couldn't resist adding 10% methanol even though running 0.76 lambda in sympathy to the piston clearances, 1.6 bar at 6000 RPM at peak power.

Result was 392 WHP and 397 Wlbft in 4th gear on the 6MT on Delta Dash. Wonder if it would hit 400 WHP with a bit of leaning off? Bang The torque was certainly enjoyable... about 430-440 lbft flywheel?

With 1.5 bar and 10% methanol it did 380 WHP. Might be worth me using 1-2ml/litre NF for practicality to see if I can get the same. Doesn't feel too stressed doing this.

I think at 1.5 bar at Star it might just hit 450 BHP without additives.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 12:17 AM
  #838  
carlos_hiraoka's Avatar
carlos_hiraoka
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Default

John each time you are pushing for more and more power ..... i u want an everyday 500bhp car u should start looking at the new Corvette, it is already born with 400hp / 400lb.ft

Carlos H.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 09:52 AM
  #839  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

I don't think that last 10% is worth it for reliable daily use though so it is back at about 350 WHP and will probably stay there for at least 5 minutes

Have been looking at the Corvette as well I'm not a stunning wheelman though so need AWD to keep me between the hedges at this level.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 11:49 AM
  #840  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Default

well I know someone mad enough to fit the corvette engine to a granada and turbo it..

David
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:02 PM.