JTaylor

hodgy0_2

Yes, interesting he does shy away from the term – but he does use “post modernism” “SJW” and “Neo-Marxism” instead – so just substitute any of those in my post – which I think largely still stands

And wow what conspiratorial hogwash he spouts – with the laughable conclusion that the world’s problems (all of them, not just Gender Neutral pronouns) are the fault of SJW’s the teaching profession and what he calls Neo-Marxists

Sorry JT it is nonsense,

just watch the video he is like a dog barking at passing cars


and boy does he go on about “marxism” – he reminds me of Goebbels in that regard

and what is the extended rant over “no one will debate me” all about!!!– you know what JT the loonies who use that technique are the Ken Hams of the world, the creationist who are desperate for some recognition that they get from a debate – Peterson’s rants about “no one willing to debate” therefore do not surprise me, a tactic I see time and time again from wacko’s of this world – AGW deniers, the 911 twoofers, creationist and now the Petersons of the world - all obsess over “debates”

http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news/4...nly-apply.html

https://www.theguardian.com/science/...science-debate

remember folks - Ken Ham is debating the position that The Flintstones is essentially a documentary, and many people think he did a pretty good job (which he actually did tbh)

and Peterson 12 rules cod psychology and pseudo-scientific/religious lobster nonsense is nothing more advanced than what my wife and I tell our children (see my earlier post about restating the obvious - but trying to sound like a pretentious academic!!) – we simply call them the “basics” as articulated in my post over 2 years ago

“GSCE's are no guarantee that teenagers/young adult have what I term "the basics"

To me these are the ability

To smile and look someone directly in the eye when talking to them
Be punctual
Speak/communicate clearly
Show interest and enthusiasm
Be polite”


https://www.scoobynet.com/1041426-gc...l#post11871319

The simple truth is JT – that if any of my beautiful sons found anything of any relevance in what Peterson (or Shapiro or Milo) has to say – I will have failed as a father


https://www.theguardian.com/books/20...-digested-read

what's is interesting about the Crace article is the comments - and how pathetically "angry" the posters defending Peterson are

the irony is lost on them that although he says "don't be a victim" his defenders, post after post show themselves to be the angry losers/victims they clearly are

JTaylor

I can’t summons up the heart to argue back. I give way.

hodgy0_2

:-) - tbh JT I am pretty tired of it all