2.1 going rotated, What turbo
#32
Scooby Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did you end up getting a new turbo?
If not, have you seen the new G series units from Garrett? A guy in my local WRX club swapped out a GTX3076 (Gen 1) 0.64 a/r for a G25-660 0.92a/r on a 2.0L (rotated setup), makes 100kw extra at 4700rpm over the old turbo. They are GT28 sized turbos, and spool as such, but flow more like the GT30's. I reckon it would go well on a 2.1!
Red line is the G25, and blue the GTX3076 - this run is on 29ps (2 bar). Not sure if your bhp is at the fly, but this turbo is making 440hp at the wheels on a low reading dyno in Sydney.
If not, have you seen the new G series units from Garrett? A guy in my local WRX club swapped out a GTX3076 (Gen 1) 0.64 a/r for a G25-660 0.92a/r on a 2.0L (rotated setup), makes 100kw extra at 4700rpm over the old turbo. They are GT28 sized turbos, and spool as such, but flow more like the GT30's. I reckon it would go well on a 2.1!
Red line is the G25, and blue the GTX3076 - this run is on 29ps (2 bar). Not sure if your bhp is at the fly, but this turbo is making 440hp at the wheels on a low reading dyno in Sydney.
#33
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like a killer turbo!
I ender up with a gtx3071r kit I bought off a guy here on SN..
not fitted yet, need another Ecu, because no one in Denmark can map Alcatek ecu.. once everything is fitted I will post in this thread again with my results :-)
cheers
I ender up with a gtx3071r kit I bought off a guy here on SN..
not fitted yet, need another Ecu, because no one in Denmark can map Alcatek ecu.. once everything is fitted I will post in this thread again with my results :-)
cheers
#34
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did you end up getting a new turbo?
If not, have you seen the new G series units from Garrett? A guy in my local WRX club swapped out a GTX3076 (Gen 1) 0.64 a/r for a G25-660 0.92a/r on a 2.0L (rotated setup), makes 100kw extra at 4700rpm over the old turbo. They are GT28 sized turbos, and spool as such, but flow more like the GT30's. I reckon it would go well on a 2.1!
Red line is the G25, and blue the GTX3076 - this run is on 29ps (2 bar). Not sure if your bhp is at the fly, but this turbo is making 440hp at the wheels on a low reading dyno in Sydney.
If not, have you seen the new G series units from Garrett? A guy in my local WRX club swapped out a GTX3076 (Gen 1) 0.64 a/r for a G25-660 0.92a/r on a 2.0L (rotated setup), makes 100kw extra at 4700rpm over the old turbo. They are GT28 sized turbos, and spool as such, but flow more like the GT30's. I reckon it would go well on a 2.1!
Red line is the G25, and blue the GTX3076 - this run is on 29ps (2 bar). Not sure if your bhp is at the fly, but this turbo is making 440hp at the wheels on a low reading dyno in Sydney.
#35
Scooby Regular
1051NM @ 5,094rpm
775Ft/lbs @ 5,094rpm
From what i know
BHP = Torque x RPM / 5252
But 775 x 5,094 / 5252 = 751bhp @ 5,094 rpm
Graph says peak of 330.6 Kw
331Kw is 443bhp
Whats going on why doesn't the math add up ?
Was this Dyno run in 1st gear ??
775Ft/lbs @ 5,094rpm
From what i know
BHP = Torque x RPM / 5252
But 775 x 5,094 / 5252 = 751bhp @ 5,094 rpm
Graph says peak of 330.6 Kw
331Kw is 443bhp
Whats going on why doesn't the math add up ?
Was this Dyno run in 1st gear ??
#38
Scooby Regular
Did you end up getting a new turbo?
If not, have you seen the new G series units from Garrett? A guy in my local WRX club swapped out a GTX3076 (Gen 1) 0.64 a/r for a G25-660 0.92a/r on a 2.0L (rotated setup), makes 100kw extra at 4700rpm over the old turbo. They are GT28 sized turbos, and spool as such, but flow more like the GT30's. I reckon it would go well on a 2.1!
Red line is the G25, and blue the GTX3076 - this run is on 29ps (2 bar). Not sure if your bhp is at the fly, but this turbo is making 440hp at the wheels on a low reading dyno in Sydney.
If not, have you seen the new G series units from Garrett? A guy in my local WRX club swapped out a GTX3076 (Gen 1) 0.64 a/r for a G25-660 0.92a/r on a 2.0L (rotated setup), makes 100kw extra at 4700rpm over the old turbo. They are GT28 sized turbos, and spool as such, but flow more like the GT30's. I reckon it would go well on a 2.1!
Red line is the G25, and blue the GTX3076 - this run is on 29ps (2 bar). Not sure if your bhp is at the fly, but this turbo is making 440hp at the wheels on a low reading dyno in Sydney.
We all know that @ 5252rpm ftlbs & bhp is equal
Above 5252rpm More Bhp than Torque
Below 5252rpm more torque than bhp.
975nm = 719 ft/lbs
So at 5283rpm it should have more than 719bhp......
This makes no sense to me ?
330kw is nowhere near 719bhp
#40
Scooby Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I haven't got an exact answer. There's another dyno is Sydney that reads very high on torque values (650nm on a VF35). I believe it reading tractive effort and not a correct derived torque. Best off calculating it yourself.
This might help.
http://www.mainlinedyno.com.au/images/downloads/DYNO_TORQUE_FIGURES_-_THE_TRUTH.pdf
This might help.
http://www.mainlinedyno.com.au/images/downloads/DYNO_TORQUE_FIGURES_-_THE_TRUTH.pdf
#42
Scooby Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#43
Scooby Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even if we use the lower one which says 975NM @ 5283rpm
We all know that @ 5252rpm ftlbs & bhp is equal
Above 5252rpm More Bhp than Torque
Below 5252rpm more torque than bhp.
975nm = 719 ft/lbs
So at 5283rpm it should have more than 719bhp......
This makes no sense to me ?
330kw is nowhere near 719bhp
We all know that @ 5252rpm ftlbs & bhp is equal
Above 5252rpm More Bhp than Torque
Below 5252rpm more torque than bhp.
975nm = 719 ft/lbs
So at 5283rpm it should have more than 719bhp......
This makes no sense to me ?
330kw is nowhere near 719bhp
In reality this car would be making 400-450ft/lbs based on the rule above.
#44
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't know this rule for HP and ft/lbs for 5252rpm. I checked against my dyno graph (a Dynapack Hub dyno) and it works. (160kw/290NM = 213HP/214ft/lbs). The two high reading torque figures I've mentioned are both off Mainline dyno's. You just have to ignore the torque figure on this plot, and look at the graph only to show the difference in turbos.
In reality this car would be making 400-450ft/lbs based on the rule above.
In reality this car would be making 400-450ft/lbs based on the rule above.
#45
Scooby Regular
#46
Scooby Regular
It is clear tho that its a superior snail
That extra spooly goodness is there to see
and if u look at gains as % instead of numbers its still looking really well.
just curious as to the logic behind the dyno.
must be another calc done to bring that torque back to reality
That extra spooly goodness is there to see
and if u look at gains as % instead of numbers its still looking really well.
just curious as to the logic behind the dyno.
must be another calc done to bring that torque back to reality
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
frayz
Subaru Parts
30
02 November 2015 12:17 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Wanted
3
11 July 2010 09:28 AM