Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

General election 8th june

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2017 | 01:21 PM
  #181  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

How about sack all current tax, income, vat, etc etc and just pay +50% at point of sale instead?

More you spend, more you get taxed, buy a ford focus and you pay on 20k and it costs you 30k, buy a ferrari at 100k and you pay 150k.

Saves billions on tax office, tax enforcement etc etc etc, no need for calculations that seem to be wrong half the time so have to spend time (and therefore money) sorting it all out etc.
Reply
Old May 16, 2017 | 01:31 PM
  #182  
Sad Weevil's Avatar
Sad Weevil
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 605
Likes: 21
From: Bristol/West Wales
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Watching Labour launch their manifesto - OMG, the second longest suicide note in history.


They are going to get smashed
Thing is, I've read the manifesto, and can't find anything in it that's radical or looney at all. In any other northern European country, it would be viewed as pretty much middle of the road Social Democrat stuff. And in reality, I suspect that most people in this country would welcome a lot of it. Can't see what's wrong with investing in education, the NHS, and the police, or committing to a n affordable housing programme for example. And as there is a pledge to not increase taxes for 95% of the population, what's the problem? Also taking back the water supply into public ownership seems a good idea, as does getting better value for money regarding railway subsidies by taking it back into public ownership, rather than paying the subsidies to German And French nationalised railways, who then pocket the profit and invest in their own systems. The Tories and popular press would have us believe that none of it is affordable, but there are plenty of economists out there who reckon that the costings are correct and attainable.
Reply
Old May 16, 2017 | 01:31 PM
  #183  
dpb's Avatar
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 13
From: riding the crest of a wave ...
Default

Theyre going to get rid of the debt by 2020 , as well as spending like mad

awesome !
Reply
Old May 16, 2017 | 01:38 PM
  #184  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by Sad Weevil
Thing is, I've read the manifesto, and can't find anything in it that's radical or looney at all. In any other northern European country, it would be viewed as pretty much middle of the road Social Democrat stuff. And in reality, I suspect that most people in this country would welcome a lot of it. Can't see what's wrong with investing in education, the NHS, and the police, or committing to a n affordable housing programme for example. And as there is a pledge to not increase taxes for 95% of the population, what's the problem? Also taking back the water supply into public ownership seems a good idea, as does getting better value for money regarding railway subsidies by taking it back into public ownership, rather than paying the subsidies to German And French nationalised railways, who then pocket the profit and invest in their own systems. The Tories and popular press would have us believe that none of it is affordable, but there are plenty of economists out there who reckon that the costings are correct and attainable.

I think where this goes wrong is that they won't be able to raise all the money they think they will, and the commitments will end up costing a lot more. Then you end up raising taxes even higher, and stifling the economy, and down we spiral again.
Reply
Old May 16, 2017 | 02:03 PM
  #185  
Dr Hu's Avatar
Dr Hu
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 28
From: Shropshire
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
How about sack all current tax, income, vat, etc etc and just pay +50% at point of sale instead?

More you spend, more you get taxed, buy a ford focus and you pay on 20k and it costs you 30k, buy a ferrari at 100k and you pay 150k.

Saves billions on tax office, tax enforcement etc etc etc, no need for calculations that seem to be wrong half the time so have to spend time (and therefore money) sorting it all out etc.
Flat Tax system - has been bandied about for years by all and sundry - even high up in the Conservative Gov. never comes to anything though..... but it does seem sensible and far cheaper to administer...
Reply
Old May 16, 2017 | 02:34 PM
  #186  
jonc's Avatar
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,647
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I think where this goes wrong is that they won't be able to raise all the money they think they will, and the commitments will end up costing a lot more. Then you end up raising taxes even higher, and stifling the economy, and down we spiral again.
Their manifesto does read like one big wish list. Raising income tax on the tiny proportion of the working public will not go anywhere near to covering the costs of what they propose. Take for instance the nationalising of the water industry, that industry alone is worth nearly £70bn and has already engulfed the £48bn they've costed in their pledges. Then of course there is also the matter of re-nationalising the railways and the energy industry. I would expect that £80k income tax threshold to drop further and/or large scale increase in the issuance of government bonds increasing the national debt and deficit. This made even more scary when the shadow chancellor didn't even know what the current deficit is.
Reply
Old May 16, 2017 | 02:37 PM
  #187  
Sad Weevil's Avatar
Sad Weevil
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 605
Likes: 21
From: Bristol/West Wales
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I think where this goes wrong is that they won't be able to raise all the money they think they will, and the commitments will end up costing a lot more. Then you end up raising taxes even higher, and stifling the economy, and down we spiral again.
So we're told. Just being told "it's unaffordable" isn't really good enough. I would like to see the proper costings, for both party's manifestos. Also, there's a £34 billion tax gap (HMRC figures for 2016) which would help out a lot.

A flat tax and universal income would be worth looking at.
Reply
Old May 16, 2017 | 03:40 PM
  #188  
David Lock's Avatar
David Lock
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
From: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
How about sack all current tax, income, vat, etc etc and just pay +50% at point of sale instead?

More you spend, more you get taxed, buy a ford focus and you pay on 20k and it costs you 30k, buy a ferrari at 100k and you pay 150k.

Saves billions on tax office, tax enforcement etc etc etc, no need for calculations that seem to be wrong half the time so have to spend time (and therefore money) sorting it all out etc.
So the fat cats on £1m plus just pay a bit on what it actually costs to live on - say £100k a year and get to keep the rest? The poor who spend 90% of their income on buying to live effectively pay tax at 50%

So HUGE loss in income to HMG and the rich just get richer. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

David
Reply
Old May 16, 2017 | 03:40 PM
  #189  
Dingdongler's Avatar
Dingdongler
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,345
Likes: 1
From: In a house
Default

I don't want us to turn into some kind of dodgy corporate tax haven but what would be the result of the proposed increases in corporation tax? Especially whilst we are brexiting??

Raising tax on the top 5 % will not pay for all these plans. We know that the mega wealthy will find loopholes or they will just leave the country. Those that will end up paying will be the earners on £80k to £150k. They'll also get caned by vat on school fees and tax on private health insurance.

A great way to encourage people to work harder and better themselves.

And even if the sums did add up and you could raise the money without corporations and the mega wealthy fleeing and the moderate high earners being disincentivised.....would you trust this group to spend that money wisely?

Diane Abbot at the home office? She fails at primary school maths.

McDonnell as chancellor?? Had no idea how much the deficit was.

Shami Chakrabarti??? She'll want to give legal aid to every terrorist bomber who wants to destroy our country and bogus refugees from around the world.

And then there's Corbyn himself. Not only did he appoint these people but he voluntarily put his ***** inside DIANE ABBOT ffs!

These are actually a very dangerous group of individuals.

Last edited by Dingdongler; May 16, 2017 at 03:48 PM.
Reply
Old May 16, 2017 | 04:14 PM
  #190  
Dr Hu's Avatar
Dr Hu
Scooby Regular
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 28
From: Shropshire
Default

Originally Posted by Dingdongler
Diane Abbot at the home office? She fails at primary school maths.

McDonnell as chancellor?? Had no idea how much the deficit was.

Shami Chakrabarti??? She'll want to give legal aid to every terrorist bomber who wants to destroy our country and bogus refugees from around the world.

And then there's Corbyn himself. Not only did he appoint these people but he voluntarily put his ***** inside DIANE ABBOT ffs!
I had to LOL at this - hahahahaha
Reply
Old May 16, 2017 | 04:34 PM
  #191  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by David Lock
So the fat cats on £1m plus just pay a bit on what it actually costs to live on - say £100k a year and get to keep the rest? The poor who spend 90% of their income on buying to live effectively pay tax at 50%

So HUGE loss in income to HMG and the rich just get richer. Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

David
If they want to buy cheap stuff they pay less tax, if they buy expensive stuff they pay more. Simples.
Reply
Old May 16, 2017 | 05:07 PM
  #192  
David Lock's Avatar
David Lock
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
From: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
If they want to buy cheap stuff they pay less tax, if they buy expensive stuff they pay more. Simples.
Do you live in the real world? Basic foodstuffs cost about the same. Asda/Aldi/Lidls being slightly cheaper than Sainsburys/Waitrose/Marks.
An old Ford costs £500. A second TV costs £50 etc etc. A family holiday every 3 years costs £1000. Christmas is expensive. Credit card companies will rip you off as will car insurance people.

The rich can go to Harrods Food Hall, the poor can't.

========

Footnote. The only people that could give Labour a fighting chance are David Miliband and Tony Blair but Blair dug his own grave some while back ably assisted by his drunken chum Campbell, The Daily Mail and the USA who screwed up the post Saddam plans.

DL
Reply
Old May 16, 2017 | 05:13 PM
  #193  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by David Lock
Do you live in the real world? Basic foodstuffs cost about the same. Asda/Aldi/Lidls being slightly cheaper than Sainsburys/Waitrose/Marks.
An old Ford costs £500. A second TV costs £50 etc etc. A family holiday every 3 years costs £1000. Christmas is expensive. Credit card companies will rip you off as will car insurance people.

The rich can go to Harrods Food Hall, the poor can't.

========

Footnote. The only people that could give Labour a fighting chance are David Miliband and Tony Blair but Blair dug his own grave some while back ably assisted by his drunken chum Campbell, The Daily Mail and the USA who screwed up the post Saddam plans.

DL



Flat tax sounds like a good idea until you dig a bit deeper.


The sales tax idea is daft because, if/when the economy slows, people will naturally spend less, and therefore tax revenue falls, and you can end up in a cycle of slowing economy, falling employment, falling spending and less and less tax revenue.


Most 'flat tax' projection I've seen show that middle and lower income bands would be significantly worse off, and the wealthy would flourish

Last edited by Martin2005; May 16, 2017 at 05:15 PM.
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 01:04 PM
  #194  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

I see lib dems are trying to buy voters by saying they will hold a second referendum lol.

Desperation has set in then lol
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 01:07 PM
  #195  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

Recent interview with some of his own constituents revealed they are sick of him going on about a second referendum. If he's not careful he will be beaten and no longer a MP. That would be a real shame
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 01:09 PM
  #196  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
Recent interview with some of his own constituents revealed they are sick of him going on about a second referendum. If he's not careful he will be beaten and no longer a MP. That would be a real shame
shame it doesn't happen to all of them,,,,
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 04:52 PM
  #197  
madscoob's Avatar
madscoob
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 2
From: u cant touch this
Default

an example of fairer tax as follows and the goverment gets more tax
md pays himself 1.6million and avoids as much tax as possible workers (1000 of them get min wage) goverment gets next to fa
new system
md gets 600 thou tax free but has to give every worker 1000 a year more
they all lose 30% ish in tax n ni
and then spend the other 700 losing another 20% in vat WIN WIN gov gets more tax workers get more money and importantly spend it, putting it back into the economy wont ever happen though cos the minnions nust be kept under control
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 05:28 PM
  #198  
David Lock's Avatar
David Lock
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
From: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
I see lib dems are trying to buy voters by saying they will hold a second referendum lol.

Desperation has set in then lol
No common sense has set in..........

May couldn't negotiate her way out of a paper bag and there is zero chance of 27 foreign countries agreeing to a decent deal for UK.

But it will gradually dawn on the thick British public that May is wrecking the country, buggering up Scotland and possibly taking the tentative Eire/NI peace deal back years.

So it will be no deal in a couple of years or carry on arguing for the next decade. But the EU itself will probably have imploded by then

David
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 06:04 PM
  #199  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

Originally Posted by David Lock
No common sense has set in..........

May couldn't negotiate her way out of a paper bag and there is zero chance of 27 foreign countries agreeing to a decent deal for UK.

But it will gradually dawn on the thick British public that May is wrecking the country, buggering up Scotland and possibly taking the tentative Eire/NI peace deal back years.

So it will be no deal in a couple of years or carry on arguing for the next decade. But the EU itself will probably have imploded by then

David
Didn't the ECJ just announce (yesterday)that the EU can make FTA deal solely without hardly any intervention of the independent governments?
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 06:25 PM
  #200  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by David Lock
No common sense has set in..........

May couldn't negotiate her way out of a paper bag and there is zero chance of 27 foreign countries agreeing to a decent deal for UK.

But it will gradually dawn on the thick British public that May is wrecking the country, buggering up Scotland and possibly taking the tentative Eire/NI peace deal back years.

So it will be no deal in a couple of years or carry on arguing for the next decade. But the EU itself will probably have imploded by then

David
stop putting your minority view above that of the majority, you lost accept it.
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 06:31 PM
  #201  
dpb's Avatar
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 13
From: riding the crest of a wave ...
Default

Best of three ?
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 07:03 PM
  #202  
neil-h's Avatar
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Berks
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
stop putting your minority view above that of the majority, you lost accept it.
Yes because of course the Brexit mob would've just let it go if they lost. These things are easy to say when you backed the winning horse.
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 07:42 PM
  #203  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

You can have another vote in forty odd years
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 07:51 PM
  #204  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 22
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by Sad Weevil
Thing is, I've read the manifesto, and can't find anything in it that's radical or looney at all. In any other northern European country, it would be viewed as pretty much middle of the road Social Democrat stuff. And in reality, I suspect that most people in this country would welcome a lot of it. Can't see what's wrong with investing in education, the NHS, and the police, or committing to a n affordable housing programme for example. And as there is a pledge to not increase taxes for 95% of the population, what's the problem? Also taking back the water supply into public ownership seems a good idea, as does getting better value for money regarding railway subsidies by taking it back into public ownership, rather than paying the subsidies to German And French nationalised railways, who then pocket the profit and invest in their own systems. The Tories and popular press would have us believe that none of it is affordable, but there are plenty of economists out there who reckon that the costings are correct and attainable.
You are describing the Overton Window

it has been reframed to the right

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window

Last edited by hodgy0_2; May 17, 2017 at 08:17 PM.
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 07:56 PM
  #205  
David Lock's Avatar
David Lock
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
From: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
stop putting your minority view above that of the majority, you lost accept it.
NO. Because I'm right and they, the HUGE 52% - - majority, are wrong. And I support the youth of this country whose future this is and not the shrill xenophobic Daily Mail readers, many of whom will be dead or dementiated by the time any deal is actually struck. Aren't I allowed to express an opinion or are you just another boring bully?

David
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 08:01 PM
  #206  
dpb's Avatar
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 13
From: riding the crest of a wave ...
Default

Lib dems are clearly the only party makes most sense , tax rises across the board


now get smokin ( unless you've psychotic tendencies )
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 08:33 PM
  #207  
David Lock's Avatar
David Lock
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
From: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
Lib dems are clearly the only party makes most sense , tax rises across the board


now get smokin ( unless you've psychotic tendencies )
Bring back Jo Grimond I say - remember him? Thoroughly decent chap.

d
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 09:39 PM
  #208  
Uncle Creepy's Avatar
Uncle Creepy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: Chewing the fat
Default

Originally Posted by David Lock
NO. Because I'm right and they, the HUGE 52% - - majority, are wrong. And I support the youth of this country whose future this is and not the shrill xenophobic Daily Mail readers, many of whom will be dead or dementiated by the time any deal is actually struck. Aren't I allowed to express an opinion or are you just another boring bully?
No, you're allowed to express an opinion, however stupid it is!

Originally Posted by dpb
Lib dems are clearly the only party makes most sense , tax rises across the board


now get smokin ( unless you've psychotic tendencies )
About as much sense as your illiterate, thicko posts!
Reply
Old May 17, 2017 | 09:48 PM
  #209  
dpb's Avatar
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 13
From: riding the crest of a wave ...
Default

oh oh , a ukip supporter lol
Reply
Old May 18, 2017 | 07:13 AM
  #210  
Paben's Avatar
Paben
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 1
From: Taken to the hills
Default

Originally Posted by David Lock
Bring back Jo Grimond I say - remember him? Thoroughly decent chap.

d

You're desperately in need of a medication change
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:16 PM.