VW and the emissions scandal
#61
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
Yep as soon as they tied emissions to company car tax it changed the game, reduce or lose market share, when you consider all the company diesels sold in the the UK alone by VW, Audi, Seat, Skoda.
The roads would be a very different place with only Ford Focus,mondeo's, Vectras and Astras to choose from as many Jap manufactures are not on some of the really big ie top 100 companies car list, or lease / hire companies either.
Wonder if Ford being American had anything to do with it, erm coming to light.
The roads would be a very different place with only Ford Focus,mondeo's, Vectras and Astras to choose from as many Jap manufactures are not on some of the really big ie top 100 companies car list, or lease / hire companies either.
Wonder if Ford being American had anything to do with it, erm coming to light.
Last edited by ditchmyster; 24 September 2015 at 05:59 AM.
#62
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
The funny thing about that is that niether Ford or GM Europe make their own diesel car engines!
Ford Europe switched to using Peugeot engines many years ago.
Their puma diesel in the old Mondeo, whilst a solid engine in itself and very economical for its size/weight was a very dirty/polluting engine. It still survives in the Transit as commercial vehicle emission regs were quite relaxed until recent years.
Vauxhall dumped Isuzu and switched to Fiat over ten years ago, using their JTD engines. They still do now. (FWIW, Fiat invented the common rail technology used in almost all modern diesels).
Ironically Honda bought the rights to old discontinued GM/Isuzu diesel and developed it as their own.
So what we have is a Ford with a Peugeot, a Vauxhall with a Fiat, and a Honda with a Vauxhall engine.
Where in the VAG and BMW corner, with have a VAG group car with a VAG group engine and a BMW car with a BMW engine. Something tells me the Germans had a far better grasp at making engines overall than the others who had to scurry around and either borrow or co-develop someone else's engine.
Ford Europe switched to using Peugeot engines many years ago.
Their puma diesel in the old Mondeo, whilst a solid engine in itself and very economical for its size/weight was a very dirty/polluting engine. It still survives in the Transit as commercial vehicle emission regs were quite relaxed until recent years.
Vauxhall dumped Isuzu and switched to Fiat over ten years ago, using their JTD engines. They still do now. (FWIW, Fiat invented the common rail technology used in almost all modern diesels).
Ironically Honda bought the rights to old discontinued GM/Isuzu diesel and developed it as their own.
So what we have is a Ford with a Peugeot, a Vauxhall with a Fiat, and a Honda with a Vauxhall engine.
Where in the VAG and BMW corner, with have a VAG group car with a VAG group engine and a BMW car with a BMW engine. Something tells me the Germans had a far better grasp at making engines overall than the others who had to scurry around and either borrow or co-develop someone else's engine.
#63
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www3.epa.gov/otaq/cert/docume...a-09-18-15.pdf
Page 2, last 2 paragraphs. Any "AECD" must be disclosed, along with a rationale for why it is not a "defeat device". In other words, detecting the test process and adjusting the engine map to pass it, is specifically banned.
#64
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought much the same, but then read the actual letter from the EPA to VW:
http://www3.epa.gov/otaq/cert/docume...a-09-18-15.pdf
Page 2, last 2 paragraphs. Any "AECD" must be disclosed, along with a rationale for why it is not a "defeat device". In other words, detecting the test process and adjusting the engine map to pass it, is specifically banned.
http://www3.epa.gov/otaq/cert/docume...a-09-18-15.pdf
Page 2, last 2 paragraphs. Any "AECD" must be disclosed, along with a rationale for why it is not a "defeat device". In other words, detecting the test process and adjusting the engine map to pass it, is specifically banned.
#65
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
I don't think they've gone far enough
If this was Toyota there'd be harikari , never mind your gracious step down for "the good of the company ,even though iv down nothing wrong" splurge
If this was Toyota there'd be harikari , never mind your gracious step down for "the good of the company ,even though iv down nothing wrong" splurge
#66
Adjust the tuning to pass a test sure but then run another tune for day to day driving, since the rules say that is illegal!
Last edited by tony de wonderful; 24 September 2015 at 03:29 PM.
#67
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd like to know what the test actually involves. For example, do they test it for flat out power? as in where you'd never legally be able to drive it? VW could make the case out over here that anything over 70 mph is of no consequence.
#68
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
Edit:
Oops, looks like I was getting Piech and Pieschetsrieder mixed-up, the latter having moved on far longer than a few months ago. MW may well have known quite a lot about what's going on.
Last edited by markjmd; 24 September 2015 at 08:35 PM.
#69
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
If you start out from the fairly safe assumption that one of the major drivers of clean-air regulations in California has always been combating smog in and around LA, I would imagine there's quite a big focus on running either at idle or fairly low-speed. Anything over 30mph isn't going to be very relevant for cars that spend large parts of their time queued-up in traffic
#73
They might need to re-band the road tax duties on cars, fingers crossed might get a rebate on the Subaru high bracket.
https://i.imgur.com/lhpUDCY.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/lhpUDCY.jpg
Last edited by daviee; 24 September 2015 at 09:26 PM.
#74
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I feel sorry for the Greens don't you? It's like getting to "first base" only to discover she's wearing "chicken fillets"
#77
Scooby Regular
http://www.motorcyclenews.com/news/2...ing-measures-/
#79
Scooby Regular
but isn't that sort of what we have anyway
i.e. If you car fails the emissions test on an MOT test - it will not get an MOT until rectified, so presumably as soon as you car leaves the MOT testers station (with a pass) it is "legal"
if you then MAP or swap the exhaust or otherwise tamper in a way that effect the emissions (in a negative) way
you are not "legal" is just that it is hard for the police to tell
what would happen if the police/dvla did a random stop and test, by the roadside and found you "over" the emissions levels
would you get one of those defective vehicle notices
#80
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WHATEVER they come up with, we'll find a way around it, don't worry.
Eventually we'll all evolve into creatures that don't use fossil fuels, but until then some part of my DNA will be making cars go faster.
Eventually we'll all evolve into creatures that don't use fossil fuels, but until then some part of my DNA will be making cars go faster.
#83
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I attended a seminar around 9 years ago where they were talking about using spectroscopy to check cars on a drive by. We tested it using my Evo 6 doing laps around the Bristol University campus. Yes, it worked! No sign of it happening though as the vans cost £100,000 a pop.
#84
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
I attended a seminar around 9 years ago where they were talking about using spectroscopy to check cars on a drive by. We tested it using my Evo 6 doing laps around the Bristol University campus. Yes, it worked! No sign of it happening though as the vans cost £100,000 a pop.
#85
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
I attended a seminar around 9 years ago where they were talking about using spectroscopy to check cars on a drive by. We tested it using my Evo 6 doing laps around the Bristol University campus. Yes, it worked! No sign of it happening though as the vans cost £100,000 a pop.
After a while they saw a pattern (newish VWs producing very high levels of Nox) and investigated further by acquiring and testing these cars. I believe the study originally circled on the EPA tests not being reflective to the real world, but in testing this theory they found the car changed its state of tune while being tested.
Considering the UK government was fined by the EU for not meeting pollution targets, I think our own government need to take a proper look at this. It should either claim a portion of the money back as it was beyond our control (the cars are made to EU regs, not UK regs), or our government just sues VAG to pay the fines that we incurred caused by their pollution.
#89
I attended a seminar around 9 years ago where they were talking about using spectroscopy to check cars on a drive by. We tested it using my Evo 6 doing laps around the Bristol University campus. Yes, it worked! No sign of it happening though as the vans cost £100,000 a pop.
#90
Scooby Regular
It's funny how no other manufacturers are jumping on this to boost sales, it's a bit like they are all trying to ignore it n the hope it goes away!