Is 60 miles around town good for £20 worth of v power
#61
Scooby Regular
Sometimes if you live at sea-level your MPG will suffer as every cold start journey will possibly be uphill. I'm fortunate to live 95m above sea level so trips to town from cold don't heavily affect my MPG averages.
#62
Scooby Regular
Admit it, the STI is severely compromised at elevated power levels.
To compete with a WRX you have to go the forged route and consider a more acceleration friendly gearbox.
#63
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
Your claim of 12.8 (which you initially denied achieving before I quoted an old post of yours) and over 400 bhp needed for it was backed up by a user who knows you, your cars history and your partner Emma.
Admit it, the STI is severely compromised at elevated power levels.
To compete with a WRX you have to go the forged route and consider a more acceleration friendly gearbox.
Admit it, the STI is severely compromised at elevated power levels.
To compete with a WRX you have to go the forged route and consider a more acceleration friendly gearbox.
Carry on trolling as for the compromise I wouldn't know as I've never been at elevated power levels.
#65
Scooby Regular
#66
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sti envy. No one in there right mind would pick a wrx over an sti for performance. There isn't even an argument. And anyone that argues is just envious because the premium was too high
#67
Scooby Regular
My 332bhp WRX
332BHP STI
WRX wins every time, and by some margin. Increasing the power in the STI will only make launching trickier.
I don't know how many more links and timeslips I have to post to prove the WRX is considerably faster.
Evo magazine 1/4 test
437/390 RCM Bug STI 12.5
333/307 Blobeye WRX 12.6
400/360 Gforce 3 12.7
350/356 2005 Type 25 STI 12.8
355/335 Gforce 2 12.8
335/280 2004 Spec C STI 13.0
330/330 TSL 333 STI 13.6
305/298 MY04 STI PPP 13.7s - Subaru claim 13.4 lol.
316/310 WR1 13.7s
Tommy and other STI fanboys will claim driver skill for the consistently quicker WRX 1/4 times but ironically he and many others have ridiculed my launching technique, granny shifting and budget tyres!
332BHP STI
WRX wins every time, and by some margin. Increasing the power in the STI will only make launching trickier.
I don't know how many more links and timeslips I have to post to prove the WRX is considerably faster.
Evo magazine 1/4 test
437/390 RCM Bug STI 12.5
333/307 Blobeye WRX 12.6
400/360 Gforce 3 12.7
350/356 2005 Type 25 STI 12.8
355/335 Gforce 2 12.8
335/280 2004 Spec C STI 13.0
330/330 TSL 333 STI 13.6
305/298 MY04 STI PPP 13.7s - Subaru claim 13.4 lol.
316/310 WR1 13.7s
Tommy and other STI fanboys will claim driver skill for the consistently quicker WRX 1/4 times but ironically he and many others have ridiculed my launching technique, granny shifting and budget tyres!
Last edited by RS_Matt; 07 December 2014 at 09:55 PM.
#69
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cymru
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never really got the supposed high oil consumption bit though, mine used about half a litre per 1000 miles and of course that's using 10/40 semi synthetic which is pretty cheap. I've owned loads of cars that have cost more in oil than the Rex.
#70
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by fat-thomas
below 12 is an awesome time.
the gtr at the end ran about that.
i wasnt running today but got 12.8 in june [2012]
the gtr at the end ran about that.
i wasnt running today but got 12.8 in june [2012]
Big fat 2009 WRX running at 12.6 with just 350bhp.
That would take some skill in an sti!
But here we go again, STI drivers can't launch for ****!
#73
Scooby Regular
#75
Scooby Regular
#77
Scooby Regular
I'm just browsing WR1's doing the 1/4 mile and there are some shockers.
600bhp WR1 recording a 12.0
WR1 getting a 15.1
I know driver skill plays it's part but the 300+ STI's seem a genuinely hard car to get going
I mean the decently launched STI racing this WR1 has 348bhp/401lb and runs a 13.9 - I was running 13.7's with just 285bhp/273lb!!!!!!!!!
How can you argue with the WRX???
#78
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2013
Location: welling,kent
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A mapped WRX Blobeye driven off-boost should be getting 95-125 miles off £20.
Sometimes if you live at sea-level your MPG will suffer as every cold start journey will possibly be uphill. I'm fortunate to live 95m above sea level so trips to town from cold don't heavily affect my MPG averages.
Are you sure about that mpg? 95-125 kilometres sounds more realistic
#79
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
I'm just browsing WR1's doing the 1/4 mile and there are some shockers.
600bhp WR1 recording a 12.0
WR1 getting a 15.1
I know driver skill plays it's part but the 300+ STI's seem a genuinely hard car to get going
I mean the decently launched STI racing this WR1 has 348bhp/401lb and runs a 13.9 - I was running 13.7's with just 285bhp/273lb!!!!!!!!!
Subaru Impreza WRX STi WR1 vs Impreza WRX STi - YouTube
How can you argue with the WRX???
#80
Scooby Regular
Very rarely less or more.
From what I've read, and I've read a lot of MPG threads, STI owners quote anywhere from 18-25mpg when driving steady.
#81
Scooby Regular
A.) The WRX is significantly quicker.
B.) The STI is extremely hard to drive to it's potential.
C.) Both A and B.
D.) STI drivers can't drive and WRX owners can.
#84
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2013
Location: welling,kent
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't go by the gallon but i pay about £1.48 litre v power and the most i can get generally is 75 to £20. Once i done 82miles but i think it was running on air lol
#85
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2013
Location: welling,kent
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#86
Scooby Regular
13.5 from a 240bhp PPP WRX
...makes the 13.9 from the 348bhp STI look silly. I won't mention the WR1 with at least 316bhp's time.
#87
Scooby Regular
#89
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2013
Location: welling,kent
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#90
Scooby Regular
Maybe change your oil and plugs if you haven't done so for a while and see if things pick up a bit.
I'm unsure what MPG you'd get from a faulty MAF sensor, tired fuel pump, post MAF air leak or front Lambda sensor etc.