JDM 2.0 STI or UK 2.5 STI
#151
Scooby Regular
http://www.dragtimes.com/Subaru-Impr...lip-18726.html
Hawk STI 370/385 - 13.16
Hand on heart think I could push mid 11's with that power in a WRX and I openly admit to being an average driver.
Hawk STI 370/385 - 13.16
Hand on heart think I could push mid 11's with that power in a WRX and I openly admit to being an average driver.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Subaru-Impr...lip-16717.html
2004 Blob STI with 375bhp and 415 torque - struggling to a 13.04
http://www.dragtimes.com/Subaru-Impr...lip-16759.html
2006 Hawk STI 13.13
Yes mate, 12.6 if you had the WRX 5 speed or equivalent!!!
2004 Blob STI with 375bhp and 415 torque - struggling to a 13.04
http://www.dragtimes.com/Subaru-Impr...lip-16759.html
2006 Hawk STI 13.13
Yes mate, 12.6 if you had the WRX 5 speed or equivalent!!!
STI fanboys: "er er, well at least we have the Brembos."
RS: "Yeah you'll need them in a fat 450bhp car."
#153
Scooby Regular
#155
Scooby Regular
#157
Scooby Regular
Tom you are the most masochistic person I've ever come across.
#159
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
Is it because its ruining your troll.
As you yourself said.
We met and you watched me run a 12.8 with passenger in my 256 bhp sti,you never forget a time remember?
So either you're lying about the meeting or you cant handle the fact my sti is ruining your silly drag time claims.
Yes or no
As you yourself said.
We met and you watched me run a 12.8 with passenger in my 256 bhp sti,you never forget a time remember?
So either you're lying about the meeting or you cant handle the fact my sti is ruining your silly drag time claims.
Yes or no
Last edited by fat-thomas; 27 November 2014 at 01:23 PM.
#160
Scooby Regular
#161
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
12.8 256 bhp with passenger... First ever run too.
I'm not questioning anything merely posting my time as confirmed by yourself as you watched me run it.
Last edited by fat-thomas; 27 November 2014 at 01:32 PM.
#162
Scooby Regular
#163
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
i ran a 12.8 with a passenger as confirmed by you who saw it.
i only have 256 bhp and you have 330 and all you managed was 0.2 faster with less weight and more bhp.
or am i missing something here
#164
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the fast lane
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What you see there is one driver beating another. The advantage gained by one car over the other by virtue of a superior reaction time, as in this instance, is referred to (by those who have more than half an idea of what they're talking about) as a 'Hole Shot'.
Nothing whatsoever to do with which badge is on which car.
Last edited by Blue by You; 27 November 2014 at 01:45 PM.
#165
Scooby Regular
i dont understand your point here, all you are doing is posting internet videos.
i ran a 12.8 with a passenger as confirmed by you who saw it.
i only have 256 bhp and you have 330 and all you managed was 0.2 faster with less weight and more bhp.
or am i missing something here
i ran a 12.8 with a passenger as confirmed by you who saw it.
i only have 256 bhp and you have 330 and all you managed was 0.2 faster with less weight and more bhp.
or am i missing something here
Ufft that 6 speed! OK The Newy is 400lbs heavier which makes it relatively a 300hp v 350hp battle.
#166
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
If this is your idea of one car outperforming another, then it illustrates what I have said all along, you talk out of your ****.
What you see there is one driver beating another. The advantage gained by one car over the other by virtue of a superior reaction time, as in this instance, is referred to (by those who have more than half an idea of what they're talking about) is called a 'Hole Shot'.
Nothing whatsoever to do with which badge is on which car.
What you see there is one driver beating another. The advantage gained by one car over the other by virtue of a superior reaction time, as in this instance, is referred to (by those who have more than half an idea of what they're talking about) is called a 'Hole Shot'.
Nothing whatsoever to do with which badge is on which car.
he cant argue this time as he has mentioned elsewhere he saw it himself.
#167
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
Your marbles!
Ufft that 6 speed! OK The Newy is 400lbs heavier which makes it relatively a 300hp v 350hp battle.
300bhp classic Subaru Sti beating a 390bhp newage Sti @Crail - YouTube
Ufft that 6 speed! OK The Newy is 400lbs heavier which makes it relatively a 300hp v 350hp battle.
300bhp classic Subaru Sti beating a 390bhp newage Sti @Crail - YouTube
12.8, 256 bhp with passenger as confirmed by you.
so if i had the same 330 bhp power as your wrx and kicked out my passenger id be way faster. power to weight
#169
Scooby Regular
If this is your idea of one car outperforming another, then it illustrates what I have said all along, you talk out of your ****.
What you see there is one driver beating another. The advantage gained by one car over the other by virtue of a superior reaction time, as in this instance, is referred to (by those who have more than half an idea of what they're talking about) is called a 'Hole Shot'.
Nothing whatsoever to do with which badge is on which car.
What you see there is one driver beating another. The advantage gained by one car over the other by virtue of a superior reaction time, as in this instance, is referred to (by those who have more than half an idea of what they're talking about) is called a 'Hole Shot'.
Nothing whatsoever to do with which badge is on which car.
I can post times and vids all day as I find them.
#170
Scooby Regular
#172
Scooby Regular
It's on the Santa Pod database, I phoned up with the T*** *** reg. Not bad for a mapped STI PPP with 430bhp, running 256 on the day.
#174
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
please provide a link to this database as your story is now falling apart as the that reg was not on the car back when you claimed we met it was under its original year related number..............ooops
cool story though bro
Last edited by fat-thomas; 27 November 2014 at 02:11 PM.
#176
Scooby Regular
I do understand what you are saying about reaction, bogging down and even racing the clock but it doesn't negate all the times that explicitly point to the WRX (or 5 speed equipped car to be fair) being the faster straighliner at power levels up to around 20% in difference.
#177
Scooby Regular
of course you did matt, what you are actually doing is making up stories to try and fit in with your troll about wrxs.
please provide a link to this database as your story is now falling apart as the that reg was not on the car back when you claimed we met it was under its original year related number..............ooops
cool story though bro
please provide a link to this database as your story is now falling apart as the that reg was not on the car back when you claimed we met it was under its original year related number..............ooops
cool story though bro
12.8 at 430bhp, is a fail.
#178
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
I do understand what you are saying about reaction, bogging down and even racing the clock but it doesn't negate all the times that explicitly point to the WRX (or 5 speed equipped car to be fair) being the faster straighliner at power levels up to around 20% in difference.
as confirmed by you i ran 12.8 with a passenger at standard sti power and before you bang on about 430 bhp i have no idea where you got that from i can only assume its something else you have made up to try and back up your wrx troll, sorry claim
Last edited by fat-thomas; 27 November 2014 at 02:19 PM.
#179
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I do understand what you are saying about reaction, bogging down and even racing the clock but it doesn't negate all the times that explicitly point to the WRX (or 5 speed equipped car to be fair) being the faster straighliner at power levels up to around 20% in difference.
#180
Scooby Regular
Gentleman's agreement power?