Climate change, the BBC and MPs - you couldn't make it up!
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Si hoc legere scis numium eruditionis habes
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,356
Likes: 58
From: in the woods...........555 Wagon Sqn
and how do you repost the huge inconsistencies in the argument that supports manmade climate change/global warming?
Last edited by trails; Apr 3, 2014 at 09:30 AM.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,356
Likes: 58
From: in the woods...........555 Wagon Sqn
so how do you explain the discrepancies in the argument that says climate change is being influenced by mankind Martin?I don't think you need an Impreza to be able to understand the facts...Boomer even posted a youtube clip so you don't even have to be able to read.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Hahahahahahaha conspiracy theorist, you are hilarious so how do you explain the discrepancies in the argument that says climate change is being influenced by mankind Martin?
I don't think you need an Impreza to be able to understand the facts...Boomer even posted a youtube clip so you don't even have to be able to read.
so how do you explain the discrepancies in the argument that says climate change is being influenced by mankind Martin?I don't think you need an Impreza to be able to understand the facts...Boomer even posted a youtube clip so you don't even have to be able to read.
What are the 'facts' exactly?
Boomers clip is what exactly - the answer, the final word? - what are you actually trying to say here...
AGM is unproven?
AGM is a lie and a conspiracy?
The impact of AGM is as yet unknown?
AGM is real yet the impacts are being exaggerated?
To all those answers you need to be able to explain WHY as well
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Si hoc legere scis numium eruditionis habes
Because these are the same climate scientists who were telling us thirty years ago that we were entering the next ice age and only 20% of the earth's population could survive?
because these are the same climate scientists who told us fifteen years ago that by 2015 the UK south coast would be Mediterranean climate, while the present med would be a desert? It better hurry up.........
Because if you speak up against it, you lose your research grants?
Because these are the same climatologists that have long-term forecast the last THREE winters 100% wrong and the last two summers 100% wrong too? yet they know what is going to happen in 25 years?
Because these are climate scientists that deny the sun's cycles?
Because the whole thing spells S C A M?
And while I'm responding to you, how about you explain how come when the ice caps melt, filling the sea with PURE water, the sea suddenly has "darker properties"???????
because these are the same climate scientists who told us fifteen years ago that by 2015 the UK south coast would be Mediterranean climate, while the present med would be a desert? It better hurry up.........
Because if you speak up against it, you lose your research grants?
Because these are the same climatologists that have long-term forecast the last THREE winters 100% wrong and the last two summers 100% wrong too? yet they know what is going to happen in 25 years?
Because these are climate scientists that deny the sun's cycles?
Because the whole thing spells S C A M?
And while I'm responding to you, how about you explain how come when the ice caps melt, filling the sea with PURE water, the sea suddenly has "darker properties"???????
Ah, I see.
So the relatively small areas of icecap at VERY high latitudes are sooooooo vitally important at reflecting the sun's light that we can't afford to lose an extra 4%?
Is that what you are saying?
And bear in mind that one of them is in semi-permanent darkness all the time too.
Nope...doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Answer my other questions please.
So the relatively small areas of icecap at VERY high latitudes are sooooooo vitally important at reflecting the sun's light that we can't afford to lose an extra 4%?
Is that what you are saying?
And bear in mind that one of them is in semi-permanent darkness all the time too.
Nope...doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Answer my other questions please.
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,356
Likes: 58
From: in the woods...........555 Wagon Sqn
I didn't ever say that there are not descrepancies, I totally get the arguments both sides. The balance of the argument is pretty heavily weighted towards what the scientific community is saying though.
What are the 'facts' exactly?
Boomers clip is what exactly - the answer, the final word? - what are you actually trying to say here...
AGM is unproven?
AGM is a lie and a conspiracy?
The impact of AGM is as yet unknown?
AGM is real yet the impacts are being exaggerated?
To all those answers you need to be able to explain WHY as well
What are the 'facts' exactly?
Boomers clip is what exactly - the answer, the final word? - what are you actually trying to say here...
AGM is unproven?
AGM is a lie and a conspiracy?
The impact of AGM is as yet unknown?
AGM is real yet the impacts are being exaggerated?
To all those answers you need to be able to explain WHY as well
http://jonova.s3.amazonaws.com/sh1/t...ook_2-3_lq.pdf
I'm not a conspiracy theorist just someone with a degree of healthy scepticism. I didn't claim to be one either, nor an expert and I don't drive an Impreza...
Scooby Senior
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
From: West Midlands
Er what?
Do you mean...
Xx-IAN-xX's post referencing http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/sta...nge_statistics
or
trails's post referencing http://mises.org/daily/5892/The-Skeptics-Case
or
my post with the yew-tyoob link
...or all, or some or none?
mb
Do you mean...
Xx-IAN-xX's post referencing http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/sta...nge_statistics
or
trails's post referencing http://mises.org/daily/5892/The-Skeptics-Case
or
my post with the yew-tyoob link
...or all, or some or none?
mb
Scooby Senior
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
From: West Midlands
Ah, I see.
So the relatively small areas of icecap at VERY high latitudes are sooooooo vitally important at reflecting the sun's light that we can't afford to lose an extra 4%?
Is that what you are saying?
And bear in mind that one of them is in semi-permanent darkness all the time too.
Nope...doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Answer my other questions please.
So the relatively small areas of icecap at VERY high latitudes are sooooooo vitally important at reflecting the sun's light that we can't afford to lose an extra 4%?
Is that what you are saying?
And bear in mind that one of them is in semi-permanent darkness all the time too.
Nope...doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Answer my other questions please.
How dare you look at reality - it is all down to the "models"
mb
Scooby Regular
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Berks
Arrggghhh - how dare you post common sense and reality - what about "the models". Sure the ice caps might be very small, and at a very shallow angle, and in the shade, and in the night for half a year, but the "models" predict that, er, something, er, yes, got it, the Aurora Bore-i-watsits diverts the sun's rays from the equator to the poles and thus melts the ice even more.
How dare you look at reality - it is all down to the "models"
mb
How dare you look at reality - it is all down to the "models"
mb
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
From: www.bbscoobys.com
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wingnuttzz
Member's Gallery
30
Apr 26, 2022 11:15 PM
matt12
ScoobyNet General
59
Nov 8, 2015 09:15 PM