Notices

Engineering validity/Structural integrity of cheapo strut braces?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06 March 2004, 10:03 PM
  #1  
chrome
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
chrome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 5,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Engineering validity/Structural integrity of cheapo strut braces?

Looking for a rear strut brace for a classic..

I was wondering if going for a cheap as chips brand (OMP for example) would be dicing with disaster?
Ie: does the cheap cost warrant the performance?
ie: is it likely to adversely affect the handling on the limit/fail beacuse of cheaper R+D/structure etc??

just want to get the gods honest truth.. no marketing BS PLEASE..

in my case- sod the bling factor, as the rear SB is in the boot!
no one will see it but me..


is it worth it? or am I just being unrealistic, and will the cheap brace work just fine as a super bling £200+ brace?

Last edited by chrome; 06 March 2004 at 10:05 PM.
Old 06 March 2004, 10:32 PM
  #2  
Katana
Scooby Regular
 
Katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: In a house
Posts: 5,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If all you want to do is stiffen the car for handling then go for it as i dont see much of a difference between this and the expensive version. If you want the car to look good for Santa Pod then go for the carbon fibre option. Depends how much it'll flex. I'd go for a straight simple one if I can but thats not possible for our cars.
Old 06 March 2004, 11:20 PM
  #3  
MiGi
Scooby Regular
 
MiGi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just typed a nice reply but it was lost DOH i will try again.

There should be nothing wrong, on the engineering side, with a cheap brace.

BUT..

When you decide on what to go for only compare like for like options.

Bearing in mind the aim of the design. which is...to keep the strut towers from flexing too much.

Firstly it is a bit of a joke that a such a small brace can make any real difference but since people manage to sell them, they must do something.

The others factors are:

material type
size of the material
design or shape of the brace

How shiny it is etc will MAKE no difference and expensive materials like carbon fiber etc are a bit waisted on this.

As i said only compare liek for like options.
i.e a steel tube brace of the same design as a slightly thicker brace or the same material/design will not be as rigid and the thicker ite, (obvious eh!)

Without going into huge depths of different types of design etc this is really all you have to go on. The more chunky the better (for same material) untill weight become an issue etc....

sorry if this doesnt answer your question but i hope it will help.
Old 06 March 2004, 11:24 PM
  #4  
chrome
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
chrome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 5,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sounds good to me guys
bring on the chunky steel
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
02 October 2015 05:26 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
Jamesh10
General Technical
3
01 October 2015 11:56 PM



Quick Reply: Engineering validity/Structural integrity of cheapo strut braces?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:16 AM.