Chelsea Vs Swansea red card!
24 January 2013, 08:54 AM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chelsea Vs Swansea red card!
What the hell was all that about ???????
The idiot of a ball boy lays across the ball to stop Eden Hazard from picking it up. He then get a "tap" from Hazards foot, gives it an oscar performance and gets the player a red card ??
The kid needs a fookin good punch if you ask me. What was the point ??
The idiot of a ball boy lays across the ball to stop Eden Hazard from picking it up. He then get a "tap" from Hazards foot, gives it an oscar performance and gets the player a red card ??
The kid needs a fookin good punch if you ask me. What was the point ??
24 January 2013, 08:56 AM
#3
24 January 2013, 09:03 AM
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Near milton keynes
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if it was a streaker or something like that everyone would be congratulating hazard.... but because it was some young c*nt everyones saying either hazard should get a massive fine and Ban or the kid should phone injury lawyers for you due to a hazard at work lol
24 January 2013, 09:04 AM
#6
I don't watch football , but seen this on the news and all over farcebook and agree the kid needs a bigger kick , to me it looked as though he was trying to toe punt the ball from under him , what a sorry state of affairs.if the kid had done this at a proper game , rugby , he would have been tied up in knots !
Last edited by Godspeed Brakes; 24 January 2013 at 09:06 AM.
24 January 2013, 09:12 AM
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Carlisle
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cocky little f*cker deserved it IF it had even been a kick to him, which it wasn't. At first it looks like he kicks the **** but from another angle you can see he kicks the ball from under the kid.
But the first point in question is what kind of a ball boy lays across the ball?! Eden was RIGHT beside the ball ready to pick it up for a throw in and that little youth throws his body across it!!!
And yer LJF I saw that tweet as well! Spotty little ****** should be banned from all games! Plus who the f*ck is a ball boy at 17?!
But the first point in question is what kind of a ball boy lays across the ball?! Eden was RIGHT beside the ball ready to pick it up for a throw in and that little youth throws his body across it!!!
And yer LJF I saw that tweet as well! Spotty little ****** should be banned from all games! Plus who the f*ck is a ball boy at 17?!
Trending Topics
24 January 2013, 09:34 AM
#9
Pretty obvious from what was said last night that clubs actually encourage ballboys to timewaste....
The lad made a meal of it, but Hazard was foolish to kick it out from under him. Always going to be on a loser.
And what footballer these days can hold his hands up and say, in all honesty, with no hint of irony, "He made it look worse than it was"?
The lad made a meal of it, but Hazard was foolish to kick it out from under him. Always going to be on a loser.
And what footballer these days can hold his hands up and say, in all honesty, with no hint of irony, "He made it look worse than it was"?
24 January 2013, 01:32 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally if I had been Hazard I would have realised the situation was being televised and picked the kid up by his ears, thrown him up in the air and vollied him into the crowd whilst shouting "that will work wonders for yer fookin Twitter account Taffy "
24 January 2013, 03:06 PM
#14
Pontificating
A 50/50 for me, they're both *****
We have a 17 year old rich kid son of a director who think's he is charlie big spuds who appears to either fall or be pushed onto the ball then milks it for a couple of seconds before Hazard kicks him, and gets nowhere near the ball.
Kid should not have laid on the ball and Hazard should have let the ref deal with it rather than taking matters in to his own hands and no doubt he will be charged for his stupidity.
Would have been worse had the kid been 11 and not had a Twatter account.
Just another day in the life of the car crash that is Chelsea
We have a 17 year old rich kid son of a director who think's he is charlie big spuds who appears to either fall or be pushed onto the ball then milks it for a couple of seconds before Hazard kicks him, and gets nowhere near the ball.
Kid should not have laid on the ball and Hazard should have let the ref deal with it rather than taking matters in to his own hands and no doubt he will be charged for his stupidity.
Would have been worse had the kid been 11 and not had a Twatter account.
Just another day in the life of the car crash that is Chelsea
and wot a cracking result 
24 January 2013, 06:19 PM
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dorset
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Swansea say they aren't claiming for compensation for the ball boy as he never took his Hazard awareness test!............I'll get my coat!
On a serious note, the kid should be banned from being a ball boy, he said on twitter pre match that he will do what needs to be done to waste time. He certainly done well; lay on the ball (pushed or not) then roll around like an immature footballer...I mean child. Would never of happened if Torres was playing, he would have missed both the ball and the boy!
On a serious note, the kid should be banned from being a ball boy, he said on twitter pre match that he will do what needs to be done to waste time. He certainly done well; lay on the ball (pushed or not) then roll around like an immature footballer...I mean child. Would never of happened if Torres was playing, he would have missed both the ball and the boy!
24 January 2013, 08:28 PM
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dorset
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1. The kid fell over like a feather
2. Hazard kicked the ball, definitely, shows it even clearer from the other side.
The kid is a faker, and you 'threatening' violence is just an immature approach that would influence your child that doing the same is correct!
Shame on you! Don't try 'manning' yourself up on a forum. If someone did actually kick a child of mine, as much as I might want to harm them, I would go down the proper routes that wouldn't make me as bad as the person that done it!
24 January 2013, 08:31 PM
#25
A hand on the back is not a push. There's no sudden jolt of the kid as he drops, he's just falling over, and there's no lunge from Hazard to suggest a push.
Please do not sensationalise it.
According to the Daily Mail Hazard is being investigated by Police, though it doesn't say if it was a response from the kid/his family.
Please do not sensationalise it.
According to the Daily Mail Hazard is being investigated by Police, though it doesn't say if it was a response from the kid/his family.
24 January 2013, 08:35 PM
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Dorset
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
24 January 2013, 08:51 PM
#28
Scooby Regular
1, The 'kid' is less than 6 months from not being a minor, and by most accounts now emerging is something of a gobsh!te, with a tendency to swagger round the place like he owns it.
2, Eden Hazard is literally only just 22 years old, a 4 year age gap is not exactly the mismatch you are inflating it into.
3, Hazard merely placed his hand on Morgan's back, and he went down like he'd been shot
If Morgan was my kid, I'd be deeply ashamed of his actions, and I'd make damned sure that he knew it
Having said all that, Chris Foy was absolutely correct to send Hazard off, his actions have no place on a football pitch, but neither too do Morgan's.
That should now be an end of it though, there is absolutely no reason to involve the law, we're not talking Cantona are we
24 January 2013, 09:00 PM
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
**** me, get a grip
1, The 'kid' is less than 6 months from not being a minor, and by most accounts now emerging is something of a gobsh!te, with a tendency to swagger round the place like he owns it.
2, Eden Hazard is literally only just 22 years old, a 4 year age gap is not exactly the mismatch you are inflating it into.
3, Hazard merely placed his hand on Morgan's back, and he went down like he'd been shot
If Morgan was my kid, I'd be deeply ashamed of his actions, and I'd make damned sure that he knew it
Having said all that, Chris Foy was absolutely correct to send Hazard off, his actions have no place on a football pitch, but neither too do Morgan's.
That should now be an end of it though, there is absolutely no reason to involve the law, we're not talking Cantona are we
1, The 'kid' is less than 6 months from not being a minor, and by most accounts now emerging is something of a gobsh!te, with a tendency to swagger round the place like he owns it.
2, Eden Hazard is literally only just 22 years old, a 4 year age gap is not exactly the mismatch you are inflating it into.
3, Hazard merely placed his hand on Morgan's back, and he went down like he'd been shot
If Morgan was my kid, I'd be deeply ashamed of his actions, and I'd make damned sure that he knew it
Having said all that, Chris Foy was absolutely correct to send Hazard off, his actions have no place on a football pitch, but neither too do Morgan's.
That should now be an end of it though, there is absolutely no reason to involve the law, we're not talking Cantona are we
