Trump
#273
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#274
Scooby Regular
@JT
it is going to be fascinating tbh
I made a post back in 2012 - regarding Mitt Romney
boy is it more relevant now
https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby...l#post10793780
for context see my post #2
I
it is going to be fascinating tbh
I made a post back in 2012 - regarding Mitt Romney
boy is it more relevant now
https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby...l#post10793780
for context see my post #2
I
#275
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@JT
it is going to be fascinating tbh
I made a post back in 2012 - regarding Mitt Romney
boy is it more relevant now
https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby...l#post10793780
for context see my post #2
I
it is going to be fascinating tbh
I made a post back in 2012 - regarding Mitt Romney
boy is it more relevant now
https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby...l#post10793780
for context see my post #2
I
#276
Interesting 'protests'
Is TV making a bit of a meal of it?
Is TV making a bit of a meal of it?
#278
Scooby Regular
#281
Scooby Senior
#283
lol!!!!!
#285
Scooby Regular
fascinating news conference by Trump press secretary - Sean Spicer
it did remind me of Chemical Ali - when he insisted that Bagdad was free from American troops when they and their tanks could clearly be seen in the background - lol
Spicer insisted the crowds at the inauguration ceremony where indeed record breaking even though they clearly not - pathetic and laughable in fact it was a clear demonstration of alt.reality
(the excuse was he was, and I am not making this up, presenting "alternative facts")
anyway the actual crowd numbers are tittle tattle and irrelevant - either way tbh
what is fascinating is that presumably they believe, in the words of Groucho Marx
“Who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?”
I suspect we are going to have 4 years of facts (backed by evidence) and 4 years of alternative facts - (backed up by 0)
it did remind me of Chemical Ali - when he insisted that Bagdad was free from American troops when they and their tanks could clearly be seen in the background - lol
Spicer insisted the crowds at the inauguration ceremony where indeed record breaking even though they clearly not - pathetic and laughable in fact it was a clear demonstration of alt.reality
(the excuse was he was, and I am not making this up, presenting "alternative facts")
anyway the actual crowd numbers are tittle tattle and irrelevant - either way tbh
what is fascinating is that presumably they believe, in the words of Groucho Marx
“Who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?”
I suspect we are going to have 4 years of facts (backed by evidence) and 4 years of alternative facts - (backed up by 0)
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 22 January 2017 at 08:18 PM.
#286
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
at all the Guardian readers on this thread having one big naive love-in!
You guys really are in for some fun in the coming years ahead with the liberal age well and truly over You'll have plenty of things to rant about, although some of you may wake up and smell the coffee during this period hopefully
You guys really are in for some fun in the coming years ahead with the liberal age well and truly over You'll have plenty of things to rant about, although some of you may wake up and smell the coffee during this period hopefully
#288
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Can you show me the picture that you are believing your eyes with ☺
I doubt very much if trump had more supporters than obama ,considering where it was held .
But i do believe the media try their best sway public opinion.
Does the picture you have seen look anywhere near similer to this one
Maybe my eyes decieve me but it looks to me like it was packed full
http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3...oGaWd2dvnSwyHA
I doubt very much if trump had more supporters than obama ,considering where it was held .
But i do believe the media try their best sway public opinion.
Does the picture you have seen look anywhere near similer to this one
Maybe my eyes decieve me but it looks to me like it was packed full
http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3...oGaWd2dvnSwyHA
Last edited by gary77; 23 January 2017 at 01:47 AM.
#292
Scooby Regular
taken an at the same time / same place
and indeed confirmed by multiple lines of evidence - including Washington area transit authority
indeed you eyes often deceive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_6-iVz1R0o
#293
Scooby Regular
#294
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
The only thing that your evidence proves with little doubt is that at 11am the numbers dont look great.
If you compare my picture and yours is it not possable and probable that more people arrived later due to protesters blocking entrances and the high security checks on people trying to get in .
The picture you posted paints the picture the media wanted.
If you compare my picture and yours is it not possable and probable that more people arrived later due to protesters blocking entrances and the high security checks on people trying to get in .
The picture you posted paints the picture the media wanted.
#295
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
ahh facebook, lol must be true!!!!!!!!!!
Jeez
Jeez
But I can understand the possible photo-cloning of the crowds.
I was only commenting on the apparent height of the shield - Facebook photo, or not. As it looks low. Whereas on the news, it did indeed look like it was covering him.
I guess it's a trick of the vantage point.
Last edited by joz8968; 23 January 2017 at 08:43 AM.
#296
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
at all the Guardian readers on this thread having one big naive love-in!
You guys really are in for some fun in the coming years ahead with the liberal age well and truly over You'll have plenty of things to rant about, although some of you may wake up and smell the coffee during this period hopefully
You guys really are in for some fun in the coming years ahead with the liberal age well and truly over You'll have plenty of things to rant about, although some of you may wake up and smell the coffee during this period hopefully
#297
Scooby Regular
The only thing that your evidence proves with little doubt is that at 11am the numbers dont look great.
If you compare my picture and yours is it not possable and probable that more people arrived later due to protesters blocking entrances and the high security checks on people trying to get in .
The picture you posted paints the picture the media wanted.
If you compare my picture and yours is it not possable and probable that more people arrived later due to protesters blocking entrances and the high security checks on people trying to get in .
The picture you posted paints the picture the media wanted.
jeez
the editor of Reuters, who commissioned the photo has explained this himself, having seen b0ll0x posted on facebook
look, I know you are a CTr Gary, and no evidence will shake your belief, but as I said up thread - I am just laughing at you lot
you believe any old cr4p - lol
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 23 January 2017 at 08:49 AM.
#298
Scooby Regular
I see what you mean, obviously. But why would the bullet shield be 'shopped (if it has)? It would serve no purpose.
But I can understand the possible photo-cloning of the crowds.
I was only commenting on the apparent height of the shield - Facebook photo, or not. As it looks low. Whereas on the news, it did indeed look like it was covering him.
I guess it's a trick of the vantage point.
But I can understand the possible photo-cloning of the crowds.
I was only commenting on the apparent height of the shield - Facebook photo, or not. As it looks low. Whereas on the news, it did indeed look like it was covering him.
I guess it's a trick of the vantage point.
you post photos from Reuters - the oldest news agency in the world, with direct quotes from the commissioning editor
but its always easy to shout "conspiracy"
look at the link I posted - it is a great TED talk about how the eye can deceive the brain
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 23 January 2017 at 08:57 AM.