Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

she is mapped! and the results are impressive!

Old Sep 4, 2013 | 09:50 PM
  #1  
JGlanzaV's Avatar
JGlanzaV
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,021
Likes: 1
Default she is mapped! and the results are impressive!

So, today enginetuner pulled out all the stops to get my car mapped and sorted out.

4 years ago and 20+k miles ago they built the engine for the car, a s206 turbo, 2.1 stroker v3 open deck wrx engine, with standard v3 cams and heads.

On the original maps it made 450hp on low boost and 517hp on high boost.

Now I have had a 2.5 sump and pick up fitted along with a decent equal length manifold from the states, and the results just show that when a decent manifold is fitted how much more power can be had along with spool and make it rev much free-er!

On the new maps, low boost made 484.9hp, and high boost made 532.3hp.

The annoying drop off at high rpm is gone, it pulls all the way to the red line. It builds boost faster, and is much more revvy, especially coupled with the short ratio 6sp box!

I can't wait to drive it and see what it is like!
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2013 | 10:02 PM
  #2  
harrisard's Avatar
harrisard
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: walton,essex
Default

Good results mate gonna be a seriously quick road car!!

Harri
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2013 | 10:22 PM
  #3  
need4speeduk's Avatar
need4speeduk
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,635
Likes: 0
From: london
Default

This the same engine you said you were running a 2.7bar drag map on?

Nice results btw
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2013 | 10:27 PM
  #4  
JGlanzaV's Avatar
JGlanzaV
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,021
Likes: 1
Default

Yep, I beieive I was slightly incorrect as to the 2.7 bar it runs at 2.1 but peaks higher on the drag map., so still higher but I believe not quite 2,7 as I was led to belve when I first acquired the car. Kind of hard to tell as most boost gauges only go up to two bar so it was checked when it was mapped today.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2013 | 10:43 PM
  #5  
techdw's Avatar
techdw
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

On an open deck block!? I am going to get engine tuner to build me an engine and was going to go for a closed but seems you have a very strong engine!
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2013 | 11:03 PM
  #6  
JGlanzaV's Avatar
JGlanzaV
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,021
Likes: 1
Default

An open deck should be okay for 500anyways if Iirc!

We have pretty much reached the limit of the s206, so any more upgrades will have to be a bigger turbo!
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2013 | 11:41 PM
  #7  
*matthewturb2000*'s Avatar
*matthewturb2000*
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
From: cambridge
Default

I was considering a cdb but recently been seeing 400 + out of a uk engine, I have a spare identical 1999 uk2000 turbo engine with bent exhaust valves, im thinking get this rebuilt or have a go myself (I have a senior saab chevy mechanic mate who can help) what would my plan be , looking at the mo for 350 350 max ,would forging the uk engine ?
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Sep 5, 2013 | 07:54 AM
  #8  
JGlanzaV's Avatar
JGlanzaV
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,021
Likes: 1
Default

I don't know about uk turbo engines so couldn't possibly comment!
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 11:05 AM
  #9  
The Pink Ninja's Avatar
The Pink Ninja
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,703
Likes: 2
From: ...
Default

Nice result, I only commented on the 2.7 as I believe that was what Steven was running in the banana last year at Totb with an 8 second pass, should be an interesting drive, Can't beat low down spool
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 12:16 PM
  #10  
MattyB1983's Avatar
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 46
From: Around
Default

Good results, it is amazing what a decent manifold can do.

I did say to you a while ago that you wouldn't of been making 2.7 bar . :-)
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 12:21 PM
  #11  
Fudgey's Avatar
Fudgey
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
From: Wilts
Default

Great results there bud
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 01:13 PM
  #12  
JGlanzaV's Avatar
JGlanzaV
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,021
Likes: 1
Default

It is peaking higher than the 2..1 bar and dropping off back to 2.1. So yeah not quite 2.7 but not far off.

Well a decent manifold constitutes equal length, titianium steel and v band connections. None of this rcm/hapspeed/gt rubbish etc! I honestly don't see why everyone usues stuff like that!
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 07:40 PM
  #13  
wiley's Avatar
wiley
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,865
Likes: 3
From: dagenham a13
Default

RCM headers have been tried and tested, performs well and people have run over 600bhp with them. not overly expensive, so why not JGlanza?

wiley
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 07:49 PM
  #14  
scoobygaz1's Avatar
scoobygaz1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 1
From: Dulverton
Default

Any pics of the graph ?
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 07:51 PM
  #15  
MattyB1983's Avatar
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 46
From: Around
Default

Can't fault these...

http://lateralperformance.co.uk/prod...e2f1bc09dffa98


Performed well for me.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 08:10 PM
  #16  
mickywrx's Avatar
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
20 Year Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,778
Likes: 4
From: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Post

Originally Posted by scoobygaz1
Any pics of the graph ?
http://bbs.22b.com/forums/showthread...781#post396781

The OP of this SN thread would struggle to lie straight in bed...
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 08:37 PM
  #17  
MattyB1983's Avatar
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 46
From: Around
Default

Originally Posted by mickywrx
http://bbs.22b.com/forums/showthread...781#post396781

The OP of this SN thread would struggle to lie straight in bed...
LOL......
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 08:59 PM
  #18  
JGlanzaV's Avatar
JGlanzaV
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,021
Likes: 1
Default

Quote Martyn J, just saying what I was told

You have received a new private message at ScoobyNet from MartynJ, entitled "Boost".

To read the original version, respond to, or delete this message, you must log in here:
https://www.scoobynet.com/private.php

This is the message that was sent:
***************
You don't and never have ran 2.7 bar, the turbo would have fell apart long ago.
The boost ran when it made 517bhp was 2.1 bar in road tune, as I said the drag map on it is drag specific as the loading is much different.
Better to say that you run 2.1 bar on the road but have a drag specific map that if usewd on the road peaks a bit higher than that.




So yeah... That is all, and at the end off the day the headers prove they are giving a definite increase over gt/rcm etc! And I'm still achieving far better times than 90% of people on here, and will be looking for a 10sec 1/4 mile next year.

So yes I was mistaken about the 2.7, and it was a genuine mistake as I got crossed wires with my friend about it. No big deal, I have been corrected and that is fine.

Either way I still make 532hp on standard heads, cams etc and its still going strong. And the times speak for themselves the fact that I need less boost makes it even better in my eyes

Haters gonna hate and all that!
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 09:04 PM
  #19  
Rob Day's Avatar
Rob Day
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (78)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,451
Likes: 13
From: North West
Default

Originally Posted by JGlanzaV
We have pretty much reached the limit of the s206, so any more upgrades will have to be a bigger turbo!
Then get it billeted
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 09:33 PM
  #20  
g7prs's Avatar
g7prs
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by mickywrx
http://bbs.22b.com/forums/showthread...781#post396781

The OP of this SN thread would struggle to lie straight in bed...



Nearly as funny as the meerkat on Facebook
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 10:34 PM
  #21  
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Default

Being fair, the figures don't lie!
We were a bit iffy about the new headers, but no question, they certainly work. The issue for a lot of people is the sound, as in not like a Scooby, being equal length.
They took a bit of fitting as the stock parts such as sandwich plate, modine etc needed work and the sump had to be changed. We kept the after market oil cooler and deleted the modine.
The headers themselves looked well made, and certainly cost more, but if you want performance, there you go!
We've been left impressed.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 11:12 PM
  #22  
prodriverules's Avatar
prodriverules
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 11,769
Likes: 1
From: C+K MOTORS
Default

Can't denie the improvement Alan but given the hassle/time and cost involved to fit them ie probably 2K or around that figure including the headers in this case I can't help thinking the bang for buck gained is not warranted?!
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 07:21 AM
  #23  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default

You'd be mistaken Ryan, they are worth every penny !
The response is vastly improved, the high end much smoother with less drop off and the fact that they may actually last a good bit longer than the GT spec version sell them to me.
Now what sofa did I lose that £2K down
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 08:16 AM
  #24  
Alan Jeffery's Avatar
Alan Jeffery
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Default

Originally Posted by prodriverules
Can't denie the improvement Alan but given the hassle/time and cost involved to fit them ie probably 2K or around that figure including the headers in this case I can't help thinking the bang for buck gained is not warranted?!
It isn't often we get the chance to do a real "back to back" but in this case, it's all we changed. We can certainly report an improvement. Whether it was worth the money depends on your point of view, but it's a lot better than occasions we've seen where a customer spent a whole lot on something he's supplied and fitted himself, only to find no improvement at all!
If we were building a high power car from scratch right now, I'd say they might be worth considering feeding into the mix.
Of course, we don't have any long term test feedback as to serviceability, although I'd say the design would allow for easier crack repair than the GT spec offers.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 08:24 AM
  #25  
AS Performance's Avatar
AS Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 1
From: north east
Default

not doubting the improvement but 4yrs between dyno runs to me doesn't amount to a "real back to back" ???

be very intrigued to see a more controlled comparison
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 08:42 AM
  #26  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default

I know what you mean Alyn, although if we are still seeing a gain some 4 yrs later I wonder what it might have been when the engine was still box fresh
Killer B have done some testing VS OE and other aftermarket headers that you can see on NASIOC.com !

As I've mentioned above, the purpose of this exercise was never to back to back them anyway, more to replace the owners 3rd set of cracked GT headers with something that should last a bit longer.
I feel his pain after recently opening up the collector of my own GT spec headers and have them welded them to repair a blow.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 02:49 PM
  #27  
2pot's Avatar
2pot
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 100
From: Birmingham
Default

Originally Posted by JGlanzaV
So yeah... That is all, and at the end off the day the headers prove they are giving a definite increase over gt/rcm etc! And I'm still achieving far better times than 90% of people on here, and will be looking for a 10sec 1/4 mile next year.

So yes I was mistaken about the 2.7, and it was a genuine mistake as I got crossed wires with my friend about it. No big deal, I have been corrected and that is fine.

Either way I still make 532hp on standard heads, cams etc and its still going strong. And the times speak for themselves the fact that I need less boost makes it even better in my eyes

Haters gonna hate and all that!
Killer B make some excellent stuff - choosing those headers imo was the right decision.
More boost doesn't always equal more performance.
What makes you think you're not going to spit out another shim?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 07:02 PM
  #28  
prodriverules's Avatar
prodriverules
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 11,769
Likes: 1
From: C+K MOTORS
Default

Originally Posted by MartynJ
You'd be mistaken Ryan, they are worth every penny !
The response is vastly improved, the high end much smoother with less drop off and the fact that they may actually last a good bit longer than the GT spec version sell them to me.
Now what sofa did I lose that £2K down

Don't be doing that to me mart,you know I'm weak willed when it comes to new mods
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2013 | 07:27 PM
  #29  
JGlanzaV's Avatar
JGlanzaV
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,021
Likes: 1
Default

I probably will at some point in time. But its not the end of the world, got the engine removal down to a t now lol! And especially with my new workshop etc!

At the end of the day the engine was never built for this amount of power, and the fact it has done 4yeard and 20+k miles is real testament as to how much abuse these can really take. It is driven hard every single time it goes out.

I have just driven back from engine tuner on the meth map, and it is savage, I didn't get to give it proper beans as the road was wet and it was spinning all 4 wheels up in 4th gear.

The power delivery Is so much smoother, the boost is building from like 2.7k now and you can hear the turbo spooling a lot earlier. The pull all the way through the gears is insane, its not relentless, definitely pulls a lot harder and smoother.

Really is a night and day difference to the gt spec/japspeed/rcm. Makes for a much better drive how she is now.

I even had to stop because the mrs thought she was going to be sick it pulls that hard hah!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimBowen
ICE
5
Jul 2, 2023 01:54 PM
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
Jun 18, 2016 03:48 PM
KK3960
General Technical
3
Oct 7, 2015 12:33 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
Oct 2, 2015 09:22 AM
mistermexican
General Technical
2
Oct 1, 2015 04:30 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:51 AM.