WF02 0PN - Does any member know this car?
It's from the Cornwall area if that helps mate?
06 November 2010, 01:16 AM
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What do you need to know?
The vehicle details for WF02 OPN are:
Date of Liability 01 04 2011
Date of First Registration 24 04 2002
Year of Manufacture 2002
Cylinder Capacity (cc) 1994CC
CO2 Emissions 290g/Km
Fuel Type Petrol
Export Marker Not Applicable
Vehicle Status Licence Not Due
Vehicle Colour BLUE
Vehicle Type Approval M1
Its taxed, but its not on the insurance database.
The vehicle details for WF02 OPN are:
Date of Liability 01 04 2011
Date of First Registration 24 04 2002
Year of Manufacture 2002
Cylinder Capacity (cc) 1994CC
CO2 Emissions 290g/Km
Fuel Type Petrol
Export Marker Not Applicable
Vehicle Status Licence Not Due
Vehicle Colour BLUE
Vehicle Type Approval M1
Its taxed, but its not on the insurance database.
06 November 2010, 01:18 AM
#6
What do you need to know?
The vehicle details for WF02 OPN are:
Date of Liability 01 04 2011
Date of First Registration 24 04 2002
Year of Manufacture 2002
Cylinder Capacity (cc) 1994CC
CO2 Emissions 290g/Km
Fuel Type Petrol
Export Marker Not Applicable
Vehicle Status Licence Not Due
Vehicle Colour BLUE
Vehicle Type Approval M1
Its taxed, but its not on the insurance database.
The vehicle details for WF02 OPN are:
Date of Liability 01 04 2011
Date of First Registration 24 04 2002
Year of Manufacture 2002
Cylinder Capacity (cc) 1994CC
CO2 Emissions 290g/Km
Fuel Type Petrol
Export Marker Not Applicable
Vehicle Status Licence Not Due
Vehicle Colour BLUE
Vehicle Type Approval M1
Its taxed, but its not on the insurance database.
Trending Topics
06 November 2010, 02:12 PM
#8
http://www.manorcarssaltash.co.uk/us...01043371647316
The ad is actually wrong as the cambelt was done at 52k according the dealer who serviced the car.
06 November 2010, 05:25 PM
#9
Looks like a clean example, The only thing I can see that has been changed are the side markers (orange when left the factory, now carbon). Mudflaps look like genuine Prodrive ones, shockingly expensive to buy so likely a good sign that someone was willing to spend money on it 
Shaun
Shaun
06 November 2010, 08:10 PM
#10
Looks like a clean example, The only thing I can see that has been changed are the side markers (orange when left the factory, now carbon). Mudflaps look like genuine Prodrive ones, shockingly expensive to buy so likely a good sign that someone was willing to spend money on it
Shaun
Shaun
The car has indeed had a ton of money spent on it. I spoke with Subaru and the previous owner even had them fit tyres to the car which is normally a sign people are happy to spend cash on the car. It's also got an almost new back box fitted from the dealer, the last bill was for around £2000.
I'm just waiting for an email to confirm all the history and the deal I've negotiated but as it stands the car is as follows;
Full Subaru history with 9 stamps with another to be done before collection.
1 previous owner
12 months MOT
Tax until April '11
3 months warranty
The dealer is also happy for me to speak to the previous owner which gives me some confidence that they are reasonably honest. The only thing that I am slightly wary of is the mileage, but I'd rather invest my cash in a car that's got a slightly higher mileage but extensive history, than a car with low miles but limited history.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ossett2k2
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
15
23 September 2015 09:11 AM